Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 53

Medical Assistance for certain adults who are not currently eligible for traditional Medicaid or BadgerCare Plus. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 1, 2013

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Insurance pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c). See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Currently, the Department of Health Services (DHS) administers the Medical Assistance (MA) program, which is a joint federal and state program that provides health services to individuals who have limited resources. Some services are provided through programs that operate under a waiver of federal Medicaid laws, including services provided through the BadgerCare Plus (BC+) and BadgerCare Plus Core (BC+ Core) programs. Under current law, BC+ provides health and medical services to eligible recipients and has a standard plan with a larger set of benefits and a Benchmark plan with fewer benefits. Recipients of standard BC+ benefits may be required to pay certain copayments for services and, with some exceptions, to pay premiums. Recipients of BC+ under the Benchmark plan have increased copayments and coinsurance for certain services, and certain recipients under the Benchmark plan may be charged higher premiums compared to certain recipients under the standard plan.

Under current law, unless DHS has a policy that conflicts with current state law eligibility requirements, the following individuals, among others, are eligible for benefits under the BC+ standard plan: a pregnant women whose family income does not exceed 200 percent of the federal poverty line (FPL); a child meeting certain criteria whose family income does not exceed 200 percent of the FPL; a child meeting certain criteria whose family income exceeds 150 percent of the FPL but the difference between the actual family income and 150 percent of the FPL is expended on behalf of a member of the child's family or the child for certain medical or health reasons; a parent or caretaker relative of a child whose family income does not exceed 200 percent of the FPL; and an individual who qualifies for a transitional extension of MA benefits even though his or her income increases above the poverty line. The following individuals, among others, are eligible for benefits under the BC+ Benchmark plan, under current law: a pregnant woman whose family income exceeds 200 percent, but does not exceed 300 percent, of the FPL; a pregnant woman and everyone in her family if her family income exceeds 300 percent of the FPL but the difference between her actual family income and 300 percent of the FPL is expended for any family member's or her medical or health care; a child whose family income exceeds 200 percent, but does not exceed 300 percent, of the FPL; and a parent or caretaker of a child whose income includes self-employment income but does not exceed 200 percent of the FPL after depreciation is deducted.

Read the full summary

Under current law, DHS also administers BC+ Core, which provides basic primary and preventive care to eligible individuals. Adults who are under age 65, who have family incomes that do not exceed 200 percent of the FPL, and who are not otherwise eligible for MA, including BC+, are eligible for benefits under BC+ Core, unless DHS has a policy that conflicts with current state law eligibility requirements.

DHS also currently administers the BadgerCare Plus Basic (BC+ Basic) plan, which is not an MA program but is funded by premiums paid by plan participants.

To be eligible for the BC+ Basic plan, an individual must be on the waiting list for BC+ Core. BC+ Basic provides health care benefits that do not exceed those benefits provided by BC+ Core. Under current law, BC+ Basic terminates on January 1, 2014.

Currently, beginning on January 1, 2014, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires states that participate in the Medicaid program to offer medical assistance benefits to adults who are under 65 years of age, are not pregnant, are not entitled to Medicare benefits, are not otherwise eligible for Medicaid, and have an income, as calculated under a specified method, that does not exceed 133 percent of the FPL (expansion population). PPACA requires the state to provide benefits to the expansion population that meet the standards of benchmark coverage as defined in PPACA. The federal Department of Health and Human Services (federal DHHS) pays a matching rate, known as the federal medical assistance percentage or FMAP, to states that participate in the Medicaid program.

PPACA creates enhanced FMAPs, which are rates that are higher than the typical matching rate, for states to cover newly eligible individuals in the expansion population and for states that already covered certain individuals in the expansion population to cover the entire expansion population. The United States Supreme Court decision, in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius , 567 U.S.

___, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012), makes coverage of the expansion population by states optional instead of mandatory.

This bill makes adults who are under 65 years of age, who are not pregnant, who are not otherwise eligible for MA under the state's traditional MA program or BC+, and whose income, as determined under federal law, do not exceed 133 percent of the FPL (Wisconsin expansion population) eligible for the BC+ Benchmark plan beginning January 1, 2014. The bill also eliminates BC+ Core and the language regarding BC+ Basic.

The bill requires that, if the benefits under the BC+ Benchmark plan are not sufficient to qualify DHS to obtain an enhanced FMAP, DHS must provide coverage that complies with PPACA in order to qualify for an enhanced FMAP. Additionally, if the federal DHHS prohibits charging a copayment or premium to the Wisconsin expansion population in order to qualify for an enhanced FMAP, DHS may not charge copayments or premiums that disqualify DHS from obtaining an enhanced FMAP.

Who's behind it

39 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 39 are Democrats.

15 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 54 names

Authors (39)

Signed on in support (15)

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 14, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Insurance.

  3. Mar 1, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.

  4. Mar 1, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 1, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Richards, Pasch, C. Taylor, Barca, Barnes, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bewley, Billings, Clark, Danou, Doyle, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Hulsey, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kessler, Kolste, Mason, Milroy, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, Ringhand, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, Smith, Vruwink, Wachs, Wright, Young, Zamarripa and Zepnick; cosponsored by Senators Erpenbach, Risser, Carpenter, Cullen, Hansen, Harris, Jauch, C. Larson, Lassa, Lehman, Miller, Shilling, L. Taylor, Vinehout and Wirch

  2. Mar 1, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. Mar 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Health and referred to committee on Insurance pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  4. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor