Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: disseminating information about a tax incremental district's annual budget and value increment, requiring a political subdivision to evaluate a tax incremental district's performance, increasing the amount that a political subdivision may add to its levy limit upon the dissolution of a tax incremental financing district, and extending the life and expenditure period for certain tax incremental financing districts. (FE)
Municipality — Taxation Natural disaster Property tax
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a
TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several
steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the
proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local
planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed
project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID.
Generally, under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,
village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not increase its levy by a
percentage that exceeds its "valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of
either zero percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized
value due to new construction, less improvements removed. The base amount of a
political subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the actual levy for
the immediately preceding year.
Under one of the current law exceptions, if DOR does not certify a value
increment for a TID as a result of the district's termination, the levy limit otherwise
applicable to the political subdivision is increased by a certain amount.
Under the current law exception to the levy limit relating to DOR not certifying
a value increment for a TID that is terminated, the allowable increase is an amount
equal to the political subdivision's maximum allowable levy for the preceding year,
multiplied by a percentage equal to 50 percent of the amount determined by dividing
the terminated TID's value increment by the political subdivision's equalized value,
as determined by DOR. This bill increases the percentage from 50 percent to 80
percent.
Also under current law, a city, village, or town (municipality) must annually
prepare and make available to the public updated reports describing the status of
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Dec 9, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Weininger, Bies, Hintz, Kahl and Pridemore; cosponsored by Senators Cowles and Gudex
- Dec 9, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State and Local Finance
- Feb 6, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 12, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1