Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: requirements and local ordinances related to certificates of food protection practices. (FE)
Food Health services, department of — Health Ordinance Restaurant
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Health Services (DHS) may issue a
certificate of food protection practices (FPP certificate) to an individual who: 1)
satisfactorily completes a written examination approved by DHS that demonstrates
the individual's basic knowledge of food protection practices; or 2) has achieved
comparable compliance. Also under current law, an FPP certificate holder may
renew the FPP certificate after five years by satisfactorily completing a
recertification training course approved by DHS as meeting standards for approval
that are established by DHS by rule.
This bill eliminates the requirement that the initial examination be written
and requires examinations to be approved by DHS as meeting standards established
by DHS by rule (approved examinations). The bill also provides that an individual
renewing an FPP certificate, instead of satisfactorily completing a recertification
training course approved by DHS, must again satisfactorily complete an approved
examination.
The bill provides, subject to an exception, that whenever food is being prepared,
processed, or served at a restaurant, the person who holds the permit for the
restaurant issued by DHS or a local health department (restaurant permit holder)
must ensure that there is a person on the restaurant premises who holds an FPP
certificate. Under the exception, the restaurant permit holder is not required to
ensure that there is an FPP certificate holder on the premises if both of the following
apply: 1) the restaurant has five or fewer food handlers who are working at the
restaurant at that time; and 2) if the restaurant has had a priority violation at each
of two consecutive inspections, the restaurant has, subsequent to those inspections,
had two consecutive inspections without a priority health violation.
Finally, the bill prohibits a city, village, town, or county (local government) from
enacting an ordinance requiring a restaurant, a restaurant permit holder, or a
person who conducts, maintains, manages, or operates a restaurant to satisfy a
requirement related to the issuance or possession of an FPP certificate that is not
found under the provisions in the statutes related to FPP certificates. The bill
provides that, if a local government has in effect on the bill's effective date an
ordinance that is so prohibited, that ordinance does not apply and may not be
enforced.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 9, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Brooks, Bernier, A. Ott, Sinicki, Bies, Kahl, Ripp and Petryk; cosponsored by Senators Farrow and L. Taylor
- Dec 9, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection
- Jan 7, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 7, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 9, 2014 · Assembly
Representative Wright added as a coauthor
- Jan 31, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Thiesfeldt
- Feb 4, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1