Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 550

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: requirements and local ordinances related to certificates of food protection practices. (FE)

Food Health services, department of — Health Ordinance Restaurant

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Department of Health Services (DHS) may issue a

certificate of food protection practices (FPP certificate) to an individual who: 1)

satisfactorily completes a written examination approved by DHS that demonstrates

the individual's basic knowledge of food protection practices; or 2) has achieved

comparable compliance. Also under current law, an FPP certificate holder may

renew the FPP certificate after five years by satisfactorily completing a

recertification training course approved by DHS as meeting standards for approval

that are established by DHS by rule.

This bill eliminates the requirement that the initial examination be written

and requires examinations to be approved by DHS as meeting standards established

by DHS by rule (approved examinations). The bill also provides that an individual

renewing an FPP certificate, instead of satisfactorily completing a recertification

training course approved by DHS, must again satisfactorily complete an approved

examination.

The bill provides, subject to an exception, that whenever food is being prepared,

processed, or served at a restaurant, the person who holds the permit for the

restaurant issued by DHS or a local health department (restaurant permit holder)

must ensure that there is a person on the restaurant premises who holds an FPP

certificate. Under the exception, the restaurant permit holder is not required to

ensure that there is an FPP certificate holder on the premises if both of the following

apply: 1) the restaurant has five or fewer food handlers who are working at the

restaurant at that time; and 2) if the restaurant has had a priority violation at each

of two consecutive inspections, the restaurant has, subsequent to those inspections,

had two consecutive inspections without a priority health violation.

Finally, the bill prohibits a city, village, town, or county (local government) from

enacting an ordinance requiring a restaurant, a restaurant permit holder, or a

person who conducts, maintains, manages, or operates a restaurant to satisfy a

requirement related to the issuance or possession of an FPP certificate that is not

found under the provisions in the statutes related to FPP certificates. The bill

provides that, if a local government has in effect on the bill's effective date an

ordinance that is so prohibited, that ordinance does not apply and may not be

enforced.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Bernier (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Kahl (D) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Sinicki (D) , Thiesfeldt (R)

3 cosponsors

Farrow (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Wright (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 9, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Brooks, Bernier, A. Ott, Sinicki, Bies, Kahl, Ripp and Petryk; cosponsored by Senators Farrow and L. Taylor

  2. Dec 9, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Jan 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 9, 2014 · Assembly

    Representative Wright added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 31, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Thiesfeldt

  7. Feb 4, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  9. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  10. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  11. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1