Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: arbitration agreements used by long-term care facilities, civil and criminal actions against health care providers and long-term care providers, use in civil and criminal actions and confidentiality of incident and occurrence reports, use as evidence of records given to a regulatory agency, use in criminal actions of records of reviews and evaluations of health care providers, limits on noneconomic damages, limits on punitive damages, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Community_based residential facility Contracts Contributory negligence Court — Procedure Damage _personal injury_ Legislature — Criminal penalties, joint review committee on Medical service Nursing homes and adult care Privacy
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes several changes to current law regarding contractual
agreements between long-term care facilities and their clients, civil actions for
negligence in long-term care facilities, punitive damages in civil actions, certain
criminal actions against health care providers, and the confidentiality and use of
reviews, incident reports, and evaluations of health care providers.
arbitration agreements in long-term care contracts
Under current law, with few exceptions, contractual agreements that compel
parties to litigation to submit to arbitration to resolve all or part of the dispute
between the parties are enforceable.
This bill prohibits an adult family home, a residential care apartment complex,
a community-based residential facility, a nursing home, a home health agency, or
hospice (long-term care facility) from requiring a resident or client to sign an
arbitration agreement as a condition of admission, retaliating against a resident or
client for not signing an arbitration agreement, or charging more money to a resident
or client for not signing an arbitration agreement. The bill includes specific penalties
for retaliating against a resident or client for not signing an arbitration agreement.
A long-term care facility that requests residents or clients to sign an arbitration
agreement must provide the arbitration agreement as a separate document in
another color and larger type size from any other admission agreement. The bill also
requires a long-term care facility to allow a resident or client to cancel an arbitration
agreement within 30 days after signing that provision and to include language about
the right to cancel in the arbitration agreement.
limits on noneconomic damages
Under current law, a person, or certain people related to the person, who is
injured by the negligence of a long-term care provider, such as a nursing home,
hospice, or assisted living facility, may sue for economic damages and for
noneconomic damages. Noneconomic damages are intended to compensate for pain
and suffering, loss of companionship, mental distress, and loss of enjoyment of life.
Current law limits noneconomic damages to $750,000 per occurrence of
negligence. Current law also limits damages for loss of society and companionship
to certain relatives recoverable in a wrongful death action against a long-term care
provider to $500,000 in the case of a deceased minor and $350,000 in the case of a
deceased adult.
Under current law, a person, or certain people related to the person, who is
injured by the long-term care provider may bring a civil action no later than three
years from the date on which the injury occurred, or within one year that the injury
was discovered or should have been discovered, except that, if a long-term care
provider conceals an act or omission that results in an injury, within one year from
the date on which the concealment was discovered or should have been discovered.
If the injury or concealment is discovered after the three-year limit has expired, the
Sponsors
Introduced by: Barnes (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Clark (D) , Danou (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hintz (D) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kessler (D) , Mason (D) , Milroy (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Richards (D) , Riemer (D) , Ringhand (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wachs (D) , Wright (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Judiciary and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 60
Failed 38–60 Feb 13, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 9, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Richards, Hebl, Wachs, Goyke, Barnes, Berceau, Billings, Jorgensen, Kessler, Mason, Milroy, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, Ringhand, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, C. Taylor, Vruwink, Wright, Young, Zamarripa, Zepnick, Hintz, Johnson, Clark and Danou; cosponsored by Senators T. Cullen, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Hansen, Harris, C. Larson, Lassa, Lehman, Risser and L. Taylor
- Dec 9, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Judiciary and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 60
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1