Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 56

Indication of veteran status on an operator's license or identification card and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 4, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill allows an applicant for a motor vehicle operator's license or identification card issued by the Department of Transportation (DOT) to indicate whether he or she is a veteran and whether he or she wishes to have his or her veteran status indicated on the license or card. If an applicant indicates that he or she is a veteran who wishes to have his or her veteran status indicated on the license or card and provides verification from the Department of Veterans Affairs that the applicant is a veteran, DOT must provide an indication of the person's veteran status on the front side of the license or card.

This bill also allows DOT to promulgate rules establishing veteran disability rating codes to assist in identifying persons that are eligible for benefits programs and requiring that a license or identification card that contains a veteran indication also include a veteran disability rating code.

Who's behind it

26 lawmakers are its ⁠. 22 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

12 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 38 names

Authors (26)

Signed on in support (12)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 16, 2013 to Apr 17, 2013

    6 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Apr 11, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Apr 11, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  5. Apr 11, 2013

    “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Apr 11, 2013

    “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  7. Mar 13, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Mar 12, 2013

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  9. Mar 12, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Mar 5, 2013

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  11. Mar 4, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  12. Mar 4, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Petryk, Kerkman, Tittl, Weatherston, Spiros, Tranel, Murphy, T. Larson, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Kahl, Bies, Marklein, Brooks, Pridemore, J. Ott, Ringhand, Kaufert, Ripp, Sinicki, Endsley, Krug, Bernier, Schraa, Petersen and Jacque; cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Petrowski, Carpenter, Hansen, Grothman, Lazich, Olsen and Lasee

  2. Mar 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Mar 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Senator Harsdorf added as a cosponsor

  4. Mar 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Vruwink added as a coauthor

  6. Mar 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Mar 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Mar 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Petryk

  9. Mar 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Petryk

  10. Apr 10, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Apr 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  12. Apr 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  13. Apr 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  14. Apr 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  15. Apr 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-17-2013 by Committee on Rules

  16. Apr 16, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Kleefisch added as a coauthor

  17. Apr 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Representatives Pope, Bernard Schaber, Kolste, Smith and Wright added as coauthors

  18. Apr 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  19. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote