Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 566

Minors acknowledging paternity; service of the summons and petition in a paternity action when the respondent is deceased; the form for a paternity action summons; releasing a frozen bank account of a support obligor; determining eligibility for Wisconsin Shares; notices to, and the exercise of rights by, a guardian ad litem in an unborn child in need of protection or services proceeding; requiring a diligent investigation by an agency that receives a report of child abuse or neglect if the agency cannot identify an individual who is suspected of the abuse or neglect; eliminating a voluntary foster care education program; the prohibition against a person who has committed armed robbery from showing that he or she has been rehabilitated for purposes of being licensed, certified, or contracted with to provide child care (suggested as remedial legislation by the Department of Children and Families)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 27, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 12, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 21, 2014

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 11, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 170

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 27, 2014: “Published 3-28-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes the following changes to the laws related to children:

1. Under current law, a court may order child support, legal custody, and periods of physical placement on the basis of a statement acknowledging paternity that is signed by both parents and filed with the state registrar. Since January 1, 2007, a minor has been prohibited from signing a statement acknowledging paternity. Current law, however, still contains references to minors signing statements acknowledging paternity, such as requiring a court to appoint a guardian ad litem for a minor party who signed a statement acknowledging paternity in an action based on the statement and authorizing the state registrar to insert the father's name on a child's birth certificate on the basis of a statement acknowledging paternity that is signed by a minor parent as long as the minor parent's parent or legal guardian signs, too. The bill harmonizes the prohibition against a minor parent signing a statement acknowledging paternity with 1) the statutes related to requirements for when the state registrar may change facts on birth certificates, 2) the statute related to requirements for rescinding a statement acknowledging paternity that has been filed with the state registrar, and 3) the statute that requires the court to appoint a guardian ad litem for a minor who signs a statement acknowledging paternity.

Read the full summary

2. Under current law, a personal representative for a deceased respondent in a paternity action may appear for the respondent whenever an appearance is required. If the deceased respondent does not have a personal representative, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem, and the guardian ad litem may appear for the deceased respondent. Current law requires that the summons and petition in the paternity action be served on both the personal representative and the guardian ad litem of a deceased respondent. The bill changes the "and" to an "or." Since the court appoints a guardian ad litem only if there is no personal representative, a deceased respondent in a paternity action would not have both a personal representative and a guardian ad litem. The bill also corrects an incorrect cross-reference to the provision relating to service of the summons and petition.

3. Under current law, the form for a summons in a paternity action provides notice that interfering with the custody of a child, which is a Class I felony, is punishable by imprisonment for up to five years. A Class I felony actually is punishable under current law by imprisonment for up to three years and six months.

The bill corrects the maximum length of time for imprisonment for interfering with the custody of a child that is stated in the form for a paternity action summons.

4. Under current law, if a person who has been ordered by a court to pay child support (obligor) is delinquent in the payments, the amount of the delinquency becomes a lien in favor of the Department of Children and Families (DCF). To enforce the lien, DCF may levy against one or more accounts that the obligor has at a financial institution by sending a notice of levy to the financial institution instructing the financial institution to prohibit the closing of or withdrawals from the account, up to the amount that is sufficient to pay the amount of the delinquency plus any financial institution and levying fees. If the obligor requests a hearing and at the hearing the court orders an alternative payment arrangement or determines that the obligor does not owe the support, or owes less than the amount claimed by DCF, the court must, under current law, order DCF to return the seized funds or the excess of the seized funds over the delinquent amount. Since DCF does not actually seize the funds, the bill requires the court to order DCF to instruct the financial institution to release the account, or funds in the account that exceed the delinquent amount, to the obligor.

5. Under current law, except in Milwaukee County, DCF is required to contract with a county department, the Milwaukee County enrollment services unit (services unit), a Wisconsin Works (W-2) agency, a child care resource and referral agency, or another agency to determine the eligibility of individuals for child care subsidies under Wisconsin Shares in a particular geographic region or for a particular Indian tribal unit, and in Milwaukee County DCF may contract with the services unit to determine eligibility. Under former law, W-2 agencies determined eligibility.

The statutes currently provide that an individual may be eligible for Wisconsin Shares if the W-2 agency determines that basic education or a course of study at a technical college would facilitate the individual's efforts to maintain employment and the individual needs child care services to participate in basic education or the course of study. The bill changes this so that the entity that makes this determination is DCF or the entity with which DCF contracts to determine eligibility, which may be other than a W-2 agency.

6. Under current law, the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the Children's Code (juvenile court) has exclusive original jurisdiction over an unborn child who is alleged to be in need of protection or services on the grounds that the unborn child's expectant mother habitually lacks self-control in the use of alcohol beverages, controlled substances, or controlled substance analogs, exhibited to a severe degree, to the extent that there is a substantial risk that the physical health of the unborn child will be seriously affected or endangered unless the expectant mother receives prompt and adequate treatment for that habitual lack of self-control (commonly referred to as a "UCHIPS proceeding"). In a UCHIPS proceeding, the unborn child, by or through the unborn child's guardian ad litem, is entitled to receive notice of all hearings involving the unborn child, including hearings involving the temporary physical custody and changes in placement of the expectant mother and revisions to or extensions of the dispositional order. The unborn child, by or through the unborn child's guardian ad litem, is also entitled to exercise certain rights as a party to the proceeding, such as the right to request a substitution of judge, to inspect records relevant to the proceeding, and to demand a public fact-finding hearing or a jury trial. In addition, an unborn child, by or through the unborn child's guardian ad litem, may request or authorize the disclosure of law enforcement, juvenile court, or social services records relating to the expectant mother of the unborn child.

The bill eliminates the provision of those notices to, and the exercise of those rights by, an unborn child, by or through the unborn child's guardian ad litem.

Instead, the bill requires those notices to be provided to, and permits those rights to be exercised by, the unborn child's guardian ad litem.

7. Under current law, if a county department of human services or social services (county department), DCF in a county having a population of 500,000 or more, or a licensed child welfare agency under contract with a county department or DCF to perform child abuse and neglect investigations (collectively "agency"), after evaluating a report of suspected or threatened child abuse or neglect, cannot determine who abused or neglected the child, the agency must initiate a diligent investigation to determine if the child is in need of protection or services. The bill instead requires an agency to initiate such an investigation if the agency cannot identify an individual who is suspected of abuse or neglect or of threatened abuse or neglect of the child.

8. Current law requires DCF to promulgate rules establishing minimum requirements for the issuance of foster home licenses, including rules requiring all foster parents to successfully complete training in the care and support needs of children who have been placed in foster care. That training must be completed before the first child is placed with the foster parent and on an ongoing basis. Current law also requires DCF to develop a voluntary foster care education program to provide specialized training for foster parents who provide care for children with special treatment needs. The bill eliminates that voluntary foster care education program.

9. Current law prohibits a person who has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent on or after his or her 12th birthday for committing a serious crime, as defined under current law, from 1) being licensed to operate a child care center; 2) being certified as a child care provider for purposes of reimbursement under Wisconsin Shares; or 3) contracting with a school board to provide a child care program (collectively, child care provider). Current law similarly prohibits such a person from being an employee or contractor of a child care provider (caregiver) or from being permitted to reside at a premises where child care is provided (nonclient resident). There is an exception to these prohibitions if the person, caregiver, or nonclient resident shows that he or she has been rehabilitated, except that current law bars a person who has committed certain violent crimes, including armed robbery, from showing that he or she has been rehabilitated for purposes of being a child care provider, a caregiver, or a nonclient resident and bars a person who has committed certain property crimes, including armed robbery, from showing that he or she has been rehabilitated for purposes of being a child care provider, but not for purposes of being a caregiver or a nonclient resident.

The bill eliminates armed robbery as a property crime for which a person is barred from showing that he or she has been rehabilitated for purposes of being a child care provider, but not for purposes of being a caregiver or a nonclient resident.

The bill, however, retains armed robbery as a violent crime for which a person is barred from showing that he or she has been rehabilitated for purposes of being a child care provider, a caregiver, or a nonclient resident.

For further information, see the Notes provided by the Law Revision Committee of the Joint Legislative Council.

Who's behind it

Law Revision Committee is its ⁠.

See all the details

Author (1)

  • Law Revision Committee

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Jan 16, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 59 to 39 · Jan 21, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 39”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Health and Human Services vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 5, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 27, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 27, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 170.

  3. Mar 26, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 11, 2014

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Feb 5, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  6. Jan 29, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Jan 23, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  8. Jan 21, 2014

    The Senate received it.

  9. Jan 21, 2014

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Jan 16, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Jan 16, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  12. Jan 16, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Dec 12, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  14. Dec 12, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Law Revision Committee

  2. Dec 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Jan 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Jan 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  6. Jan 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  7. Jan 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-21-2014 by Committee on Rules

  8. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  9. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives C. Taylor, Kessler, Berceau, Wachs, Hebl, Pope and Ohnstad

  10. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 39

  11. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Jan 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Jan 23, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Human Services

  17. Jan 29, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  18. Feb 4, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  19. Feb 5, 2014 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  20. Feb 5, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  21. Feb 6, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  25. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Feb 11, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  28. Mar 4, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-4-2014

  29. Mar 26, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2014

  30. Mar 27, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-27-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 170

  31. Mar 27, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 3-28-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote