Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 570

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: extended out-of-home care to 21 years of age for children with individualized education programs, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Administrative rules Children — Special educational needs Guardian and ward Juvenile court School — Curriculum

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, an order of the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under

the Children's Code and the Juvenile Justice Code (juvenile court) that places or

continues the placement of a child in out-of-home care terminates when the child

reaches 18 years of age, one year after entry of the order, or, if the child is a full-time

student at a secondary school or its vocational or technical equivalent and is

reasonably expected to complete the program before reaching 19 years of age, when

the child reaches 19 years of age, whichever is later, unless the juvenile court

specified a shorter period of time or terminates the order sooner.

This bill permits a child placed in out-of-home care who is a full-time student

at a secondary school or its vocational or technical equivalent and for whom an

individualized education program (IEP) is in effect (child with an IEP) to continue

in out-of-home care until the child is granted a high school or high school

equivalency diploma or reaches 21 years of age, whichever occurs first, under either

an extended dispositional order of the juvenile court or a voluntary

transition-to-independent-living agreement between the child, or the child's

guardian on behalf of the child, and the agency primarily responsible for providing

services to the child under the dispositional order (agency). (An IEP is a written

statement for a child with a disability developed by an IEP team appointed by the

child's local educational agency that includes, among other things, the child's level

of academic achievement and functional performance, measurable goals for the

child, the special education and related services to be provided to the child, and how

the child's progress toward attaining those goals will be measured.)

Specifically, the bill requires an agency, not less than 120 days before the

termination date of a dispositional order of a child with an IEP who has attained 18

years of age or the termination date of a termination of parental rights order

transferring a child with an IEP to the guardianship of an agency (TPR agency

guardianship order), to request the child to indicate whether he or she wishes to be

discharged from out-of-home care on termination of the dispositional or TPR agency

guardianship order, wishes to continue in out-of-home care under an extension of

the dispositional order, or wishes to continue in out-of-home care under a voluntary

transition-to-independent-living agreement.

If the child with an IEP indicates that he or she wishes to be discharged from

out-of-home care on termination of the dispositional or TPR agency guardianship

order, the agency must request the juvenile court to hold a transition-to-discharge

hearing, and the juvenile court must hold the hearing within 30 days after receipt

of the request. At the hearing the juvenile court must review with the child the

options of being discharged from out-of-home care on termination of the

dispositional or TPR agency guardianship order, continuing in out-of-home care

under an extension of the dispositional order, or continuing in out-of-home care

under a voluntary agreement.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: C. Taylor (D) , Kolste (D) , Krug (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Petryk (R)

5 cosponsors

Billings (D) , Darling (R) , Kahl (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Moulton (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Children and Families, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Jan 30, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Loudenbeck, LeMahieu, Kolste, Krug, Petryk and C. Taylor; cosponsored by Senators Moulton, Darling and L. Taylor

  2. Dec 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Children and Families

  3. Dec 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Dec 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Kahl added as a coauthor

  6. Dec 18, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Dec 18, 2013 · Assembly

    Representative Billings added as a coauthor

  8. Dec 19, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Dec 27, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Dec 30, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Jan 6, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Jan 15, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  13. Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Children and Families, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  14. Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance

  15. Feb 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Loudenbeck

  16. Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and referred to committee on Rules

  17. Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 by Committee on Rules

  18. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Loudenbeck

  19. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  20. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1