Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: objecting to property tax assessments. (FE)
Circuit court Civil service Property tax — Assessment Tax appeals commission
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, generally, when an assessor assesses property and
determines the property's assessment is different from the property's assessment for
the previous year, the assessor must provide written notice of the changed
assessment to the property owner at least 15 days before the meeting of the board
of review. Under this bill, a notice of changed assessment must be sent at least 60
days before the meeting of the board of review.
Under current law, generally, a property owner, or the property owner's
representative, must appear in person at the board of review hearing to testify under
oath regarding his or her objection to a property tax assessment. This bill permits
a property owner, to submit written statements, under oath, instead of appearing at
the hearing.
Under current law, the board of review must presume that the assessor's
assessment is correct, but the property owner may rebut that presumption by a
sufficient showing that the assessment is incorrect. Under the bill, the property
owner may rebut the presumption that the assessment is correct by showing by the
preponderance of the evidence that the assessment is incorrect.
Finally, under current law, a property owner may file a claim for an excessive
assessment with the taxation district where the property is located. If the taxation
district disallows the claim, the property owner may commence an action in circuit
court to recover the amount of the disallowed claim. Under this bill, if the assessment
exceeds $1,000,000, the property owner may commence an action with the tax
appeals commission rather than in the circuit court.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 18, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Nygren; cosponsored by Senator Darling
- Dec 18, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means
- Jan 3, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Nygren
- Feb 5, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Nygren
- Feb 6, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Joint Committee on Finance
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1