Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 576

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: objecting to property tax assessments. (FE)

Circuit court Civil service Property tax — Assessment Tax appeals commission

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, generally, when an assessor assesses property and

determines the property's assessment is different from the property's assessment for

the previous year, the assessor must provide written notice of the changed

assessment to the property owner at least 15 days before the meeting of the board

of review. Under this bill, a notice of changed assessment must be sent at least 60

days before the meeting of the board of review.

Under current law, generally, a property owner, or the property owner's

representative, must appear in person at the board of review hearing to testify under

oath regarding his or her objection to a property tax assessment. This bill permits

a property owner, to submit written statements, under oath, instead of appearing at

the hearing.

Under current law, the board of review must presume that the assessor's

assessment is correct, but the property owner may rebut that presumption by a

sufficient showing that the assessment is incorrect. Under the bill, the property

owner may rebut the presumption that the assessment is correct by showing by the

preponderance of the evidence that the assessment is incorrect.

Finally, under current law, a property owner may file a claim for an excessive

assessment with the taxation district where the property is located. If the taxation

district disallows the claim, the property owner may commence an action in circuit

court to recover the amount of the disallowed claim. Under this bill, if the assessment

exceeds $1,000,000, the property owner may commence an action with the tax

appeals commission rather than in the circuit court.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Nygren (R)

1 cosponsors

Darling (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Feb 7, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 18, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Nygren; cosponsored by Senator Darling

  2. Dec 18, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means

  3. Jan 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Nygren

  6. Feb 5, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Nygren

  7. Feb 6, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance

  9. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  10. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  11. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  12. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1