Assembly Bill 581
Advertising related to adoption or other permanent physical placements of a child, delegation of parental power regarding the care and custody of a child for more than one year, unauthorized interstate placements of children, requesting a study of adoption disruption and dissolution, and providing penalties. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 16, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 20, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 13, 2014
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 18, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 314
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 16, 2014: “Published 4-17-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Introduction This bill makes various changes relating to advertising related to adoption or other permanent physical placements of a child, delegation of parental power regarding the care and custody of a child for more than one year, and unauthorized interstate placements of children. The bill also requests the Joint Legislative Council (JLC) to study adoption disruption and dissolution in this state.
Advertising related to adoption or other permanent physical placements Under current law, subject to certain exceptions, no person may communicate by any public medium that originates within this state, including by newspaper, periodical, telephone book listing, outdoor advertising sign, radio, or television: 1) for the purpose of finding a child to adopt; 2) that the person will find an adoptive home for a child or arrange for or assist in the adoption of adoptive placement of a child; or 3) that the person will place a child for adoption (advertising related to adoption). That prohibition, however, does not apply to the Department of Children and Families (DCF), a county department of human services or social services that is authorized to place children for adoption (county department), or a child welfare agency that is licensed to place children for adoption; the State Adoption Information Exchange or the State Adoption Center; a foster care and adoption resource center or a postadoption resource center funded by this state; an individual who has received a favorable recommendation regarding his or her fitness to be an adoptive parent from DCF, a county department, a child welfare agency, or an entity of another jurisdiction that is authorized to conduct adoption home studies; or an individual seeking to place his or her own child for adoption.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill expands the prohibition against advertising related to adoption to include communicating by any computerized communication system, including by electronic mail, Internet site, Internet profile, or any similar medium of communication provided via the Internet.
The bill also expands the prohibition against advertising related to adoption to prohibit a person from advertising: 1) for the purpose of finding a child to otherwise take into permanent physical custody; 2) that the person will find any other permanent physical placement for a child or arrange for or assist in any other permanent physical placement of a child; or 3) that the person will place a child in any other permanent physical placement.
In addition, the bill limits the current exception to the prohibition against advertising related to adoption that permits an individual seeking to place his or her own child for adoption to permit such an individual to advertise for adoption only if the child is under one year of age.
Delegation of parental powers Under current law, subject to certain exceptions, a parent who has legal custody of a child may, by a properly executed power of attorney, delegate to an agent, for no longer than one year, any of his or her powers regarding the care and custody of the child (parental powers).
This bill permits a parent who has legal custody of a child, by a properly executed power of attorney, to delegate to an agent, for longer than one year, any of his or her parental powers, but only if the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the Children's Code (juvenile court) approves that delegation.
Under the bill, a parent who wishes to delegate his or her parental powers to an agent for longer than one year, the agent to whom the parent wishes to delegate those powers, or an organization that is facilitating that delegation must file a petition with the juvenile court requesting the court's approval of that delegation.
The petition must have a draft copy of the power of attorney delegating those powers attached to the petition and must state, among other things, all of the following: 1) the relationship of the agent to the child; 2) whether the parent wishes to delegate to the agent full parental power or partial parental power and, if the parent wishes to delegate partial parental power, the specific powers that the parent wishes to delegate and any limitations on those powers; 3) the proposed term of the delegation of parental powers, the reasons for the delegation of parental powers, and whether the parent proposes to provide any support to the agent during that term; and 4) facts and circumstances showing that the delegation of parental powers would be in the best interests of the child and that the person nominated as agent is fit, willing, and able to exercise those powers.
The juvenile court must hold a hearing on a petition requesting the court's approval of a proposed delegation of parental powers. In determining the appropriate disposition of such a petition, the juvenile court must consider the best interests of the child as the prevailing factor and must also consider whether the person nominated as agent would be fit, willing, and able to exercise the parental powers to be delegated, the reasons for the delegation of parental powers, and the amount of support that the parent is willing and able to provide to the agent during the term of the delegation of parental powers. If the juvenile court determines that the proposed delegation of parental powers is in the best interests of the child, the juvenile court may approve the proposed delegation of parental powers and may also designate an amount of support to be paid by the child's parents to the agent. If the juvenile court approves the proposed delegation of parental powers, the parent and the person nominated as agent may execute a power of attorney delegating those powers as approved by the juvenile court.
Under the bill, any person who delegates his or her powers regarding the care and custody of a child for longer than one year without first obtaining the approval of the juvenile court is subject to a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed nine months, or both.
Unauthorized interstate placements of children Under current law, the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children and certain other statutory provisions govern the interstate placement of children.
This bill prohibits any person from sending a child out of this state, bringing a child into this state, or causing a child to be sent out of this state or brought into this state for the purpose of permanently transferring physical custody of the child to a person who is not a relative of the child. A person who violates that prohibition is subject to a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed nine months, or both. That prohibition, however, does not apply to a placement of a child that is authorized under the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children or any other statutory provisions governing the interstate placement of children or a placement of a child that is approved by a court of competent jurisdiction of the sending state or receiving state.
Study of adoption disruption and dissolution Finally, the bill requests the JLC to study adoption disruption and dissolution in this state. If the JLC undertakes such a study, the JLC must do all of the following:
1) study the extent of adoption disruption and dissolution in this state and the efforts by DCF, counties, and child welfare agencies to prevent such disruption and dissolution; 2) recommend legislation to define adoption disruption and adoption dissolution, to prevent adoption disruption and adoption dissolution in this state, to require DCF, county departments, and child welfare agencies to track and report on disrupted or dissolved adoptions; 3) consider legislative options to prepare prospective adoptive parents for adoption and to support adoptive parents after an adoption; and 4) submit its findings, conclusions, and recommendations to the 2015 legislature when it commences.
Who's behind it
25 lawmakers are its . 13 are Democrats and 12 are Republicans.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 32 names Hide the names
Authors (25)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Evan Goyke · Democrat, Assembly
- Dianne Hesselbein · Democrat, Senate
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Dean Kaufert · Republican, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Joel Kleefisch · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Don Pridemore · Republican, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Janis Ringhand · Democrat, Senate
- Joe Sanfelippo · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Larson · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Mandy Wright · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (7)
- Peter Barca · Democrat, Assembly
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Nikiya Harris Dodd · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Joe Leibham · Republican, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 6 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Family Law vote on an amendment
Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Family Law vote on an amendment
Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Family Law vote on an amendment
Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Family Law vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 97 to 0 · Feb 13, 2014 · 2 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (97)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alvin Ott (R, 3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (D, 70)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Andy Jorgensen (D, 43)
- Bill Kramer (R, 97)
- Bob Kulp (R, 69)
- Brett Hulsey (D, 78)
- Chad Weininger (R, 4)
- Chris Danou (D, 92)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Cory Mason (D, 66)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dana Wachs (D, 91)
- Daniel LeMahieu (R, 59)
- Daniel Riemer (D, 7)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Dean Knudson (R, 30)
- Debra Kolste (D, 44)
- Don Pridemore (R, 22)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Eric Genrich (D, 90)
- Erik Severson (R, 28)
- Evan Goyke (D, 18)
- Fred Clark (D, 81)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Garey Bies (R, 1)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Sanfelippo (R, 15)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- John Klenke (R, 88)
- John Murtha (R, 29)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Jon Richards (D, 19)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Katrina Shankland (D, 71)
- Keith Ripp (R, 42)
- Ken Skowronski (R, 82)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Mandela Barnes (D, 11)
- Mandy Wright (D, 85)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Mary Czaja (R, 35)
- Mary Williams (R, 87)
- Melissa Sargent (D, 48)
- Michael Schraa (R, 53)
- Mike Endsley (R, 26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Pat Strachota (R, 58)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robb Kahl (D, 47)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Sandy Pasch (D, 10)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Stephen Smith (D, 75)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Steve Kestell (R, 27)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
- Thomas Larson (R, 67)
- Thomas Weatherston (R, 62)
- Tod Ohnstad (D, 65)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
Didn't vote (2)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (D, 57)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 14, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 16, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 16, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 314.
-
Apr 15, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 18, 2014
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 14, 2014
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 17, 2014
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Feb 14, 2014
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 13, 2014
The Assembly passed it, 97 to 0.
-
Feb 13, 2014
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 13, 2014
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Feb 3, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 3, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
Jan 21, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 15, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 9, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 3, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 20, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Family Law.
-
Dec 20, 2013
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 20, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kleefisch, Johnson, Tittl, Goyke, Sanfelippo, Kessler, Spiros, Hesselbein, Zepnick, Thiesfeldt, Milroy, Kulp, T. Larson, A. Ott, Berceau, Ohnstad, Ringhand, Vruwink, Sinicki, Bies, Richards, Pridemore, LeMahieu, Kaufert and Wright; cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Harris, Lassa, Miller, Lehman and Carpenter
- Dec 20, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law
- Jan 3, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 9, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 15, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kleefisch
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 27, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Kleefisch
- Jan 27, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Kleefisch
- Jan 27, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representative Kleefisch
- Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Committee on Family Law
- Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-13-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Representative Barca added as a coauthor
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 adopted
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 4 adopted
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 4 adopted
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 5 offered by Representative Kleefisch
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 5 adopted
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 0
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 14, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 14, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 14, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 3, 2014 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 4)
- Apr 3, 2014 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 5)
- Apr 3, 2014 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 4-3-2014
- Apr 15, 2014 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014
- Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 314
- Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly
Published 4-17-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote