Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 581

Advertising related to adoption or other permanent physical placements of a child, delegation of parental power regarding the care and custody of a child for more than one year, unauthorized interstate placements of children, requesting a study of adoption disruption and dissolution, and providing penalties. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 16, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 20, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 13, 2014

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 18, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 314

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 16, 2014: “Published 4-17-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Introduction This bill makes various changes relating to advertising related to adoption or other permanent physical placements of a child, delegation of parental power regarding the care and custody of a child for more than one year, and unauthorized interstate placements of children. The bill also requests the Joint Legislative Council (JLC) to study adoption disruption and dissolution in this state.

Advertising related to adoption or other permanent physical placements Under current law, subject to certain exceptions, no person may communicate by any public medium that originates within this state, including by newspaper, periodical, telephone book listing, outdoor advertising sign, radio, or television: 1) for the purpose of finding a child to adopt; 2) that the person will find an adoptive home for a child or arrange for or assist in the adoption of adoptive placement of a child; or 3) that the person will place a child for adoption (advertising related to adoption). That prohibition, however, does not apply to the Department of Children and Families (DCF), a county department of human services or social services that is authorized to place children for adoption (county department), or a child welfare agency that is licensed to place children for adoption; the State Adoption Information Exchange or the State Adoption Center; a foster care and adoption resource center or a postadoption resource center funded by this state; an individual who has received a favorable recommendation regarding his or her fitness to be an adoptive parent from DCF, a county department, a child welfare agency, or an entity of another jurisdiction that is authorized to conduct adoption home studies; or an individual seeking to place his or her own child for adoption.

Read the full summary

This bill expands the prohibition against advertising related to adoption to include communicating by any computerized communication system, including by electronic mail, Internet site, Internet profile, or any similar medium of communication provided via the Internet.

The bill also expands the prohibition against advertising related to adoption to prohibit a person from advertising: 1) for the purpose of finding a child to otherwise take into permanent physical custody; 2) that the person will find any other permanent physical placement for a child or arrange for or assist in any other permanent physical placement of a child; or 3) that the person will place a child in any other permanent physical placement.

In addition, the bill limits the current exception to the prohibition against advertising related to adoption that permits an individual seeking to place his or her own child for adoption to permit such an individual to advertise for adoption only if the child is under one year of age.

Delegation of parental powers Under current law, subject to certain exceptions, a parent who has legal custody of a child may, by a properly executed power of attorney, delegate to an agent, for no longer than one year, any of his or her powers regarding the care and custody of the child (parental powers).

This bill permits a parent who has legal custody of a child, by a properly executed power of attorney, to delegate to an agent, for longer than one year, any of his or her parental powers, but only if the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the Children's Code (juvenile court) approves that delegation.

Under the bill, a parent who wishes to delegate his or her parental powers to an agent for longer than one year, the agent to whom the parent wishes to delegate those powers, or an organization that is facilitating that delegation must file a petition with the juvenile court requesting the court's approval of that delegation.

The petition must have a draft copy of the power of attorney delegating those powers attached to the petition and must state, among other things, all of the following: 1) the relationship of the agent to the child; 2) whether the parent wishes to delegate to the agent full parental power or partial parental power and, if the parent wishes to delegate partial parental power, the specific powers that the parent wishes to delegate and any limitations on those powers; 3) the proposed term of the delegation of parental powers, the reasons for the delegation of parental powers, and whether the parent proposes to provide any support to the agent during that term; and 4) facts and circumstances showing that the delegation of parental powers would be in the best interests of the child and that the person nominated as agent is fit, willing, and able to exercise those powers.

The juvenile court must hold a hearing on a petition requesting the court's approval of a proposed delegation of parental powers. In determining the appropriate disposition of such a petition, the juvenile court must consider the best interests of the child as the prevailing factor and must also consider whether the person nominated as agent would be fit, willing, and able to exercise the parental powers to be delegated, the reasons for the delegation of parental powers, and the amount of support that the parent is willing and able to provide to the agent during the term of the delegation of parental powers. If the juvenile court determines that the proposed delegation of parental powers is in the best interests of the child, the juvenile court may approve the proposed delegation of parental powers and may also designate an amount of support to be paid by the child's parents to the agent. If the juvenile court approves the proposed delegation of parental powers, the parent and the person nominated as agent may execute a power of attorney delegating those powers as approved by the juvenile court.

Under the bill, any person who delegates his or her powers regarding the care and custody of a child for longer than one year without first obtaining the approval of the juvenile court is subject to a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed nine months, or both.

Unauthorized interstate placements of children Under current law, the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children and certain other statutory provisions govern the interstate placement of children.

This bill prohibits any person from sending a child out of this state, bringing a child into this state, or causing a child to be sent out of this state or brought into this state for the purpose of permanently transferring physical custody of the child to a person who is not a relative of the child. A person who violates that prohibition is subject to a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed nine months, or both. That prohibition, however, does not apply to a placement of a child that is authorized under the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children or any other statutory provisions governing the interstate placement of children or a placement of a child that is approved by a court of competent jurisdiction of the sending state or receiving state.

Study of adoption disruption and dissolution Finally, the bill requests the JLC to study adoption disruption and dissolution in this state. If the JLC undertakes such a study, the JLC must do all of the following:

1) study the extent of adoption disruption and dissolution in this state and the efforts by DCF, counties, and child welfare agencies to prevent such disruption and dissolution; 2) recommend legislation to define adoption disruption and adoption dissolution, to prevent adoption disruption and adoption dissolution in this state, to require DCF, county departments, and child welfare agencies to track and report on disrupted or dissolved adoptions; 3) consider legislative options to prepare prospective adoptive parents for adoption and to support adoptive parents after an adoption; and 4) submit its findings, conclusions, and recommendations to the 2015 legislature when it commences.

Who's behind it

25 lawmakers are its ⁠. 13 are Democrats and 12 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 32 names

Authors (25)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Family Law vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Family Law vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Family Law vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Family Law vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 97 to 0 · Feb 13, 2014 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (97)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 14, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 16, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 16, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 314.

  3. Apr 15, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 18, 2014

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 14, 2014

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 17, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Feb 14, 2014

    The Senate received it.

  8. Feb 13, 2014

    The Assembly passed it, 97 to 0.

  9. Feb 13, 2014

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Feb 13, 2014

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Feb 3, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Feb 3, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  13. Jan 21, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Jan 15, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Jan 9, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Jan 3, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Dec 20, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Family Law.

  18. Dec 20, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kleefisch, Johnson, Tittl, Goyke, Sanfelippo, Kessler, Spiros, Hesselbein, Zepnick, Thiesfeldt, Milroy, Kulp, T. Larson, A. Ott, Berceau, Ohnstad, Ringhand, Vruwink, Sinicki, Bies, Richards, Pridemore, LeMahieu, Kaufert and Wright; cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Harris, Lassa, Miller, Lehman and Carpenter

  2. Dec 20, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law

  3. Jan 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 9, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 15, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kleefisch

  7. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 27, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Kleefisch

  9. Jan 27, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Kleefisch

  10. Jan 27, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representative Kleefisch

  11. Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Committee on Family Law

  13. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  14. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  15. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  16. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  17. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  18. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-13-2014 by Committee on Rules

  19. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Representative Barca added as a coauthor

  20. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 adopted

  22. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 4 adopted

  23. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 adopted

  24. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 5 offered by Representative Kleefisch

  25. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 5 adopted

  26. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  28. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 0

  29. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Feb 14, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  31. Feb 17, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  32. Feb 17, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  33. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  34. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  35. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  36. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  37. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  38. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  39. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  40. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  41. Apr 3, 2014 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 4)

  42. Apr 3, 2014 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 5)

  43. Apr 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-3-2014

  44. Apr 15, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014

  45. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 314

  46. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-17-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote