Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 59

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: searches by a law enforcement officer of a person on probation, parole, or extended supervision. (FE)

Corrections, department of Criminal identification and investigation Culvert Parole or probation Police Sentences and penalties Sex crimes

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, with certain exceptions, if a person is convicted of a crime

a court may withhold sentencing of the person or may impose a sentence but stay its

execution and, in either case, place the person on probation. The court may impose

conditions of probation. If a person violates a condition of probation, the person's

probation may be revoked.

Under current law, a person who is released from confinement in a prison to

parole or to extended supervision is subject to conditions set by the parole

commission or by the Department of Corrections (DOC). If a person violates one of

these conditions, his or her parole or extended supervision may be revoked and the

person may be returned to prison.

This bill specifies that a person who is placed on probation or a person who is

released from incarceration to parole or extended supervision is subject to having his

or her person, residence, and any property under his or her control searched by a law

enforcement officer at any time if the officer reasonably suspects that the person is

committing, is about to commit, or has committed a crime or a violation of a condition

of probation or release. Under the bill, a law enforcement officer may not conduct

the search in an arbitrary, capricious, or harassing manner and must notify DOC as

soon as practical after he or she conducts the search.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Born (R) , Brooks (R) , Endsley (R) , Jacque (R) , Knodl (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Marklein (R) , Spiros (R) , Stone (R) , Stroebel (R) , Tittl (R)

2 cosponsors

Leibham (R) , Petrowski (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 4, Noes 3

Passed 4–3 May 24, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Endsley, Jacque, Knodl, Stone, Born, Stroebel, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Brooks, Tittl, Marklein and Spiros; cosponsored by Senators Leibham and Petrowski

  2. Mar 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Apr 23, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 2, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 10, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  7. May 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Goyke

  8. May 15, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Goyke

  9. May 16, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. May 24, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  11. May 24, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  12. Jun 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-13-2013 by Committee on Rules

  13. Jun 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representative Bies

  14. Jun 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 5 offered by Representative Bies

  15. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1