Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 598

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: changing the method for charging interest that may be charged on special assessments and changing the interest rate paid on claims for certain unlawfully assessed property taxes and creating an exception for local levy limits. (FE)

Bonds — Municipal Interest Municipality — Taxation Property tax — Assessment

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a local governmental unit may allow a special assessment

that is imposed to pay for public improvements to be paid in installments. A local

governmental unit includes a city, village, town, county, and special purpose district

that is allowed to levy a special assessment. If installments are allowed, the local

governmental unit may impose interest on the unpaid balance of the special

assessment. Current law does not prescribe a maximum rate of interest that may

be charged. Under this bill, installment payments are structured by the local

governmental unit's governing body. Also under the bill, the interest rate is set by

the governing body, and may include an administrative fee of up to 2 percent. Once

the interest rate is set, the bill prohibits the rate from being changed during the

course of the installment payments.

Also under current law, if a person is aggrieved by the levy and collection of an

unlawful property tax assessed against his or her property, the person may file a

claim against the taxation district to recover the unlawful tax. If the taxation district

denies the claim, the person may file an action in circuit court. If the person filing

the claim prevails with the taxation district or at the circuit court, the recovery on

his or or her claim may include interest at the rate of 0.8 percent per month.

Under this bill the interest rate that a person may receive on the recovery of an

unlawfully assessed tax is the average annual discount rate determined by the last

auction of 6-month U.S. treasury bills that is held before the claim for recovery is

filed or the action for recovery is commenced. This rate of interest is the same as the

maximum amount of interest that an aggrieved person may collect on the recovery

of an excessive assessment of property taxes imposed by a taxation district.

Generally, under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,

village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not increase its levy by a

percentage that exceeds its "valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of

either zero percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized

value due to new construction, less improvements removed. The base amount of a

political subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the actual levy for

the immediately preceding year.

Under one of the current law exceptions, the limit that would otherwise apply

does not apply to the amount that a political subdivision levies to make up any

revenue shortfall for the debt service on a revenue bond issued by the political

subdivision.

Under this bill, a similar exception is created for the amount that a political

subdivision levies to make up any revenue shortfall for the debt service on a special

assessment B bond issued to fund a public improvement.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bernier (R) , Bies (R) , Kahl (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Steineke (R)

1 cosponsors

Petrowski (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 3, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 0

Passed 97–0 Feb 13, 2014 official source full page

Aye · 97

Not voting · 2

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 5, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 5, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Steineke, Kahl, Bernier, Bies, Ohnstad, Ripp and Petryk; cosponsored by Senator Petrowski

  2. Jan 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  7. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  8. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-13-2014 by Committee on Rules

  9. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Steineke

  11. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  12. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 0

  15. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  17. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and taken up

  18. Feb 14, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Feb 17, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development and Local Government

  20. Feb 19, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Feb 24, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Gudex

  22. Feb 25, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Gudex

  23. Mar 5, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  24. Mar 5, 2014 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  25. Mar 5, 2014 · Senate

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  26. Mar 5, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  27. Mar 7, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  28. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  29. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  30. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  33. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate Amendment 2 adopted)

  35. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  36. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 10:07 AM on 3-20-2014 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28

  37. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Senate Amendment 2 concurred in

  38. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  39. Apr 2, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-2-2014

  40. Apr 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-7-2014

  41. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 222

  42. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-9-2014