Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 607

Manufacture and sale of food and beverage containers that contain bisphenol A and providing penalties. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 7, 2014

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits a person from manufacturing or selling at wholesale a "child's container," which is defined as an empty baby bottle or spill-proof cup for use by a child who is three years or younger, that contains bishpenol A (BPA). In addition, a manufacturer or wholesaler of a child's container must ensure that the container is conspicuously labeled as not containing BPA. Current law also requires a retail seller to ensure that a child's container is so labelled, and prohibits a retail seller from selling a child's container that contains BPA. The foregoing requirements do not apply to the sale of a used child's container. Current law allows the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) to commence actions to restrain violations of the foregoing requirements. In addition, DATCP is authorized to order manufacturers, wholesalers, and retail sellers to recall child containers sold in violation of the requirements. A manufacturer or wholesaler who violates the requirements is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $100 and not more than $10,000 for each violation, and is also subject to a fine of not more than $5,000, imprisonment for not more than one year in the county jail, or both. A retail seller who violates the requirements is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $50 and not more than $200 for each violation. If a court imposes a forfeiture or fine, current law requires the court to also impose a surcharge equal to 50 percent of the forfeiture or fine, which is appropriated to DATCP for enforcing and administering the foregoing requirements.

This bill creates additional requirements for food containers that contain BPA.

Read the full summary

The bill defines "food container" as any container in which any food or beverage is intended to be enclosed for retail sale of the food or beverage. The bill prohibits the manufacture or wholesale of food containers that contain BPA unless the manufacturer or wholesaler ensures that the food container is conspicuously labeled as containing BPA. The bill also prohibits a person from selling food or beverage at retail in a container that contains BPA unless the container is conspicuously labeled as containing BPA. The bill's requirements do not apply to sales of used food containers.

As with violations of child container requirements under current law, the bill authorizes DATCP to commence actions to restrain violations of the bill and to issue recall orders. Manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers who violate the bill are subject to the forfeitures under current law that apply to violations of the child container requirements. However, the bill does not subject manufacturers or wholesalers to fines or imprisonment. If a court imposes a forfeiture under the bill, the court must also impose a 50 percent surcharge, which is appropriated to DATCP for enforcing and administering both the child container requirements under current law and the food container requirements under the bill.

Who's behind it

16 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 16 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (16)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 29, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Jan 21, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Jan 7, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

  5. Jan 7, 2014

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives C. Taylor, Ringhand, Kahl, Barnes, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Genrich, Hebl, Kolste, Mason, Ohnstad, Pope, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki and Wachs; cosponsored by Senators Miller, Risser and L. Taylor

  2. Jan 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate