Assembly Bill 620
Human trafficking, human trafficking victims, property forfeitures, rights of victims, admitting evidence of past actions, definitions of certain offenses, and providing penalties. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 23, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 14, 2014
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 13, 2014
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 18, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 362
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 23, 2014: “Published 4-24-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Human trafficking Current law defines trafficking as actually, or attempting the action of, recruiting, enticing, harboring, transporting, providing, or obtaining an individual without consent of the individual. This bill eliminates the element that the individual has not consented. Also, under current law, a person who engages in trafficking for the purposes of labor, services, or a commercial sex act is guilty of a felony if the trafficking is done by any specified act, including causing or threatening to cause harm to any individual; restraining or threatening to restrain any individual; or controlling any individual's access to an addictive controlled substance. This bill adds threatening to control any individual's access to an addictive controlled substance; using any scheme, pattern, or other means to coerce, threaten, or intimidate any individual; using or threatening to use force or violence on any individual; and causing or threatening to cause any individual to do any act against the individual's will or without the individual's consent.
This bill creates a process under which an individual who has been convicted, adjudicated delinquent, or found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect for the crime of prostitution may request a court to vacate the conviction, adjudication, or finding, or to expunge the record. An individual may follow this process if the individual was a victim of trafficking, committed the violation as a result of being a victim, and submits a statement of facts and, if applicable, the reason the individual failed previously to raise an affirmative defense or otherwise allege that the violation was a result of being a trafficking victim. The court may comply with the request if the court, after determining that the individual is qualified, notifies the prosecutor of the request, gives the prosecutor opportunity to respond, and determines that the individual will benefit and society will not be harmed.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, a person who receives compensation from the earnings of a prostitute is guilty of a Class F felony. This bill adds that a person is guilty of a Class F felony if the person knowingly receives compensation from the earnings of debt bondage or from the earnings of sexual contact or intercourse for which anything of value is given to, promised, or received by any person.
Sex offenses, victims of crimes, and domestic abuse Under current law, a person who, for purposes of sexual arousal or gratification, causes a child to expose genitals or pubic area or exposes genitals or pubic area to a child is, with some exceptions, guilty of a felony. This bill adds the exposure of "intimate parts," which is defined to include a breast, buttock, anus, or groin of a human being.
Under current law, if a judge receives a presentence investigation report, the judge must disclose the contents of the report to the district attorney prior to sentencing and the district attorney generally must keep the report confidential.
This bill provides the victim the right to view the sentence recommendation on the presentence report and allows the district attorney to share the recommendation.
Under current law, with exceptions, evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts may not be admitted in a criminal proceeding to prove the person acted in character.
This bill states that, in a prosecution alleging human trafficking, an offense against a child, a serious sex offense, or a crime of domestic abuse or alleging the defendant committed a crime against his or her spouse, an individual with whom the defendant cohabited, or an individual with whom the defendant has a child, evidence of similar acts is generally admissible, and is admissible regardless of whether the victim of the other act is the same as the offense that is the subject of the prosecution.
Under current law, a court may place a person who has committed a serious sex offense on lifetime supervision if the court determines that such placement is necessary to protect the public. Included in the list of serious sex offenses is a violation, or the solicitation, conspiracy, or attempt to commit a violation, of a crime against life and bodily security, a crime against property, a crime against sexual morality, or a crime against a child, if the court determines that the person committed the violation for his or her sexual arousal or gratification. This bill adds to the list of serious sex offenses the violation, or the solicitation, conspiracy, or attempt to commit a violation, of a crime against reputation, privacy, and civil liberties, if the court determines that the person committed the violation for his or her sexual arousal or gratification.
This bill adds the offense of strangulation to several statutes, including to the list of offenses that render the person ineligible to participate in the intensive sanctions program, to the list of crimes for which a victim may be compensated by the Department of Justice, and to the definition of domestic abuse offense for the purpose of keeping confidential the victim's personal information on certain voting documents.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.
Who's behind it
27 lawmakers are its . 18 are Republicans and 9 are Democrats.
12 more lawmakers .
See all 39 names Hide the names
Authors (27)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Jill Billings · Democrat, Assembly
- Mary Czaja · Republican, Assembly
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Robb Kahl · Democrat, Assembly
- Dean Kaufert · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Kestell · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kleefisch · Republican, Assembly
- Debra Kolste · Democrat, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Loudenbeck · Republican, Assembly
- John Murtha · Republican, Assembly
- Warren Petryk · Republican, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Melissa Sargent · Democrat, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
- Dana Wachs · Democrat, Assembly
- Thomas Weatherston · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (12)
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Michael Ellis · Republican, Senate
- Richard Gudex · Republican, Senate
- Nikiya Harris Dodd · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Mary Lazich · Republican, Senate
- Terry Moulton · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Schraa, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, Vruwink, Milroy, Jacque, Ohnstad, Kerkman, Riemer, Hintz, Smith, Barnes, Murphy, Petersen, Spiros, Knudson, Genrich, Clark, Young, Marklein, Bewley, Hebl, Jagler, Williams, Steineke, Brooks, Zepnick, Rodriguez and Sanfelippo
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 60 to 37 · Feb 13, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 14, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 23, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 23, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 362.
-
Apr 22, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 18, 2014
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Mar 18, 2014
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 18, 2014
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Mar 14, 2014
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 17, 2014
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Feb 14, 2014
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 13, 2014
The Assembly passed it.
-
Feb 13, 2014
29 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Feb 3, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 3, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.
-
Jan 29, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 27, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 23, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 23, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 22, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 17, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 14, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.
-
Jan 14, 2014
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Loudenbeck, Petryk, Ballweg, Berceau, Bernier, Bies, Billings, Czaja, Johnson, Kahl, Kaufert, Kestell, Kleefisch, Kolste, LeMahieu, Murtha, A. Ott, Pope, Richards, Sargent, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, Wachs, Weatherston and Krug; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Harris, Vinehout, Gudex, Moulton, Olsen, L. Taylor, Lazich and Ellis, by request of Attorney General J. B. Van Hollen
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice
- Jan 17, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 22, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 27, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kessler
- Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Johnson
- Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler, Johnson, C. Taylor, Danou, Wachs, Hebl, Goyke, Young and Barnes
- Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-13-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Representatives Schraa, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, Vruwink, Milroy, Jacque, Ohnstad, Kerkman, Riemer, Hintz, Smith, Barnes, Murphy, Petersen, Spiros, Knudson, Genrich, Clark, Young, Marklein, Bewley, Hebl, Jagler, Williams, Steineke, Brooks, Zepnick, Rodriguez and Sanfelippo added as coauthors
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 14, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 14, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 14, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Senator Darling added as a cosponsor
- Mar 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 24, 2014 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Mar 24, 2014 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 3-24-2014
- Apr 22, 2014 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014
- Apr 23, 2014 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 362
- Apr 23, 2014 · Assembly
Published 4-24-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote