Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 620

Human trafficking, human trafficking victims, property forfeitures, rights of victims, admitting evidence of past actions, definitions of certain offenses, and providing penalties. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 23, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 14, 2014

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 13, 2014

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 18, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 362

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 23, 2014: “Published 4-24-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Human trafficking Current law defines trafficking as actually, or attempting the action of, recruiting, enticing, harboring, transporting, providing, or obtaining an individual without consent of the individual. This bill eliminates the element that the individual has not consented. Also, under current law, a person who engages in trafficking for the purposes of labor, services, or a commercial sex act is guilty of a felony if the trafficking is done by any specified act, including causing or threatening to cause harm to any individual; restraining or threatening to restrain any individual; or controlling any individual's access to an addictive controlled substance. This bill adds threatening to control any individual's access to an addictive controlled substance; using any scheme, pattern, or other means to coerce, threaten, or intimidate any individual; using or threatening to use force or violence on any individual; and causing or threatening to cause any individual to do any act against the individual's will or without the individual's consent.

This bill creates a process under which an individual who has been convicted, adjudicated delinquent, or found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect for the crime of prostitution may request a court to vacate the conviction, adjudication, or finding, or to expunge the record. An individual may follow this process if the individual was a victim of trafficking, committed the violation as a result of being a victim, and submits a statement of facts and, if applicable, the reason the individual failed previously to raise an affirmative defense or otherwise allege that the violation was a result of being a trafficking victim. The court may comply with the request if the court, after determining that the individual is qualified, notifies the prosecutor of the request, gives the prosecutor opportunity to respond, and determines that the individual will benefit and society will not be harmed.

Read the full summary

Under current law, a person who receives compensation from the earnings of a prostitute is guilty of a Class F felony. This bill adds that a person is guilty of a Class F felony if the person knowingly receives compensation from the earnings of debt bondage or from the earnings of sexual contact or intercourse for which anything of value is given to, promised, or received by any person.

Sex offenses, victims of crimes, and domestic abuse Under current law, a person who, for purposes of sexual arousal or gratification, causes a child to expose genitals or pubic area or exposes genitals or pubic area to a child is, with some exceptions, guilty of a felony. This bill adds the exposure of "intimate parts," which is defined to include a breast, buttock, anus, or groin of a human being.

Under current law, if a judge receives a presentence investigation report, the judge must disclose the contents of the report to the district attorney prior to sentencing and the district attorney generally must keep the report confidential.

This bill provides the victim the right to view the sentence recommendation on the presentence report and allows the district attorney to share the recommendation.

Under current law, with exceptions, evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts may not be admitted in a criminal proceeding to prove the person acted in character.

This bill states that, in a prosecution alleging human trafficking, an offense against a child, a serious sex offense, or a crime of domestic abuse or alleging the defendant committed a crime against his or her spouse, an individual with whom the defendant cohabited, or an individual with whom the defendant has a child, evidence of similar acts is generally admissible, and is admissible regardless of whether the victim of the other act is the same as the offense that is the subject of the prosecution.

Under current law, a court may place a person who has committed a serious sex offense on lifetime supervision if the court determines that such placement is necessary to protect the public. Included in the list of serious sex offenses is a violation, or the solicitation, conspiracy, or attempt to commit a violation, of a crime against life and bodily security, a crime against property, a crime against sexual morality, or a crime against a child, if the court determines that the person committed the violation for his or her sexual arousal or gratification. This bill adds to the list of serious sex offenses the violation, or the solicitation, conspiracy, or attempt to commit a violation, of a crime against reputation, privacy, and civil liberties, if the court determines that the person committed the violation for his or her sexual arousal or gratification.

This bill adds the offense of strangulation to several statutes, including to the list of offenses that render the person ineligible to participate in the intensive sanctions program, to the list of crimes for which a victim may be compensated by the Department of Justice, and to the definition of domestic abuse offense for the purpose of keeping confidential the victim's personal information on certain voting documents.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

27 lawmakers are its ⁠. 18 are Republicans and 9 are Democrats.

12 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 39 names

Authors (27)

Signed on in support (12)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 3, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 37 · Feb 13, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 14, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 23, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 23, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 362.

  3. Apr 22, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 18, 2014

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  5. Mar 18, 2014

    The Senate passed it too.

  6. Mar 18, 2014

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  7. Mar 14, 2014

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  8. Feb 17, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  9. Feb 14, 2014

    The Senate received it.

  10. Feb 13, 2014

    The Assembly passed it.

  11. Feb 13, 2014

    29 more representatives signed on in support.

  12. Feb 3, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Feb 3, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  14. Jan 29, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Jan 27, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Jan 23, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Jan 23, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Jan 22, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. Jan 17, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Jan 14, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

  21. Jan 14, 2014

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Loudenbeck, Petryk, Ballweg, Berceau, Bernier, Bies, Billings, Czaja, Johnson, Kahl, Kaufert, Kestell, Kleefisch, Kolste, LeMahieu, Murtha, A. Ott, Pope, Richards, Sargent, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, Wachs, Weatherston and Krug; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Harris, Vinehout, Gudex, Moulton, Olsen, L. Taylor, Lazich and Ellis, by request of Attorney General J. B. Van Hollen

  2. Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Jan 17, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 22, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  9. Jan 27, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Jan 28, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kessler

  11. Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Johnson

  13. Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  14. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  15. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  16. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler, Johnson, C. Taylor, Danou, Wachs, Hebl, Goyke, Young and Barnes

  17. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-13-2014 by Committee on Rules

  18. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  19. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Representatives Schraa, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, Vruwink, Milroy, Jacque, Ohnstad, Kerkman, Riemer, Hintz, Smith, Barnes, Murphy, Petersen, Spiros, Knudson, Genrich, Clark, Young, Marklein, Bewley, Hebl, Jagler, Williams, Steineke, Brooks, Zepnick, Rodriguez and Sanfelippo added as coauthors

  20. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37

  21. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  24. Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Feb 14, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  26. Feb 17, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  27. Feb 17, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  28. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  29. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  30. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  31. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  32. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  33. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  34. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  35. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Senator Darling added as a cosponsor

  36. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  37. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  38. Mar 24, 2014 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  39. Mar 24, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-24-2014

  40. Apr 22, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014

  41. Apr 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 362

  42. Apr 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-24-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote