Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: the information contained in referendum questions to authorize exceeding county levy limits.
County — Taxation Primary elections Referendum
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Generally, under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,
village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not increase its levy in any year
by a percentage that exceeds its "valuation factor," which is defined as the greater
of either zero percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's
equalized value due to new construction, less improvements removed. The base
amount of a political subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the
actual levy for the immediately preceding year.
Under one of the current law exceptions, a political subdivision may exceed the
levy limits that otherwise apply if the political subdivision's governing body adopts
a resolution to that effect and the resolution is approved in a referendum.
Under current law, the wording in the referendum question that appears on the
ballot must include information relating to the maximum allowable levy rate
increase for the next year and the total levy for the next year. However, the
information that is necessary to prepare the question is not available to the political
subdivision in time to put the question on the ballot for the spring primary or election
or partisan primary. The bill requires that in preparing the ballot question for a
referendum at a partisan primary in 2014, a county with a population of at least
30,000, but no more than 40,000, that is adjacent to a county with a population
exceeding 450,000, must use the most recent data that it has and the most recent
data from the Department of Revenue.
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Feb 11, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Marklein, Ringhand and Bernier
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Campaigns and Elections
- Feb 4, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 4, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-18-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1