Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: local airports and the process for enacting aerial approach ordinances. (FE)
Aviation County Municipality Ordinance
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, any county or city, village, or town (municipality) in this
state may own and operate airports or airport facilities, such as landing fields or
take-off strips, or spaceports or spaceport facilities (collectively "airports"), either
within or outside the limits of the county or municipality. A county or municipality
that owns an airport may protect the aerial approaches to the airport by adopting an
ordinance regulating, restricting, and determining the use, location, height, number
of stories, and size of buildings and structures and objects of natural growth in the
vicinity of the airport (within three miles of an airport or five miles of a spaceport).
To initiate the adoption of an aerial approach ordinance, one of the following must
hold at least one public hearing after giving the public notice and formulate a
tentative ordinance: 1) if a county owns the airport, the county park commission or,
if the county has a county executive or county administrator, the county park
manager, except that if there is no such commission or manager, a committee of the
governing body of the county; 2) if a city or village owns the airport, the city or village
plan commission or, if there is no such commission, a committee of the governing body
of the city or village; or 3) if a town owns the airport, a committee of the governing
body of the town.
Under this bill, an aerial approach ordinance is always initiated by a committee
of the governing body of the county or municipality that owns the airport, which, as
under current law, must hold at least one public hearing after giving notice and
formulate a tentative ordinance.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Mar 27, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 24, 2014 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Schraa, Thiesfeldt, Bies, A. Ott, Krug, Bernier and Spiros; cosponsored by Senators Gudex and Grothman
- Jan 24, 2014 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 25, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 11, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 27, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Mar 27, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1