Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 69

Requiring a mandatory minimum sentence for causing bodily harm to another while driving while intoxicated and providing a penalty. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 14, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, no person may cause injury to another person by the operation of a vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, or a controlled substance analog or any combination thereof, with a prohibited alcohol concentration, or with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood (OWI-related injury). A person who does so is generally subject to a fine of not less than $300 nor more than $2,000, imprisonment for not less than 30 days nor more than one year in the county jail, or both.

Under current law, if a person causes an OWI-related injury with a minor passenger in his or her vehicle, the person is guilty of a felony and the applicable fine and jail sentence are doubled. Current law offers a first offender an opportunity to receive a shorter jail sentence if he or she completes a period of probation that includes successful completion of alcohol or drug counseling.

Read the full summary

Under current law, if the person has committed a prior OWI-related offense, causing an OWI-related injury is a Class H felony, and the person may be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to six years, or both. Current law doubles the applicable maximum fine and term of imprisonment for these offenses if the person has a passenger who is under the age 16 in his or her vehicle at the time of the offense.

If a person causes an OWI-related injury that results in great bodily harm to another person or to an unborn child, the person is guilty of a Class F felony, and may be fined up to $25,000, imprisoned for 12 years and six months, or both.

Current law requires a person who is sentenced to prison for a felony to serve a bifurcated sentence, with a portion of the term of imprisonment to be served confined in prison, and the remainder to be served under supervision in the community.

Under this bill, if a person causes an OWI-related injury and the injured person suffers bodily harm, the offender who caused the OWI-related injury must serve at least six months in jail. If the injured person suffers substantial bodily harm, the offender is guilty of a Class H felony and must serve at least two years confined in prison, and if the injured person suffers great bodily harm, the offender is guilty of a Class F felony and must serve at least three years confined in prison.

Under the bill, a person with a prior OWI-related offense is guilty of a Class H felony and must serve a minimum of one year confined in prison if the OWI-related injury causes bodily harm, and a minimum of three years confined in prison if the OWI-related injury causes substantial bodily harm.

Under the bill, if the injured party was a passenger in the person's car, a court may sentence the person to less than the minimum if the court finds that the best interests of the community will be served and that the public will not be harmed. If the court sentences a person to less than the minimum, the bill requires the court to put its findings in writing. The bill eliminates the doubling provisions for causing an OWI-related injury that results in bodily harm or substantial bodily harm and eliminates the opportunity for a reduced sentence in exchange for completing a period of probation that includes drug or alcohol treatment.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

5 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 7 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 0 · Nov 25, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 2 · Nov 25, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 7, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 25, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Nov 25, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 2.

  4. Aug 1, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Aug 1, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. May 14, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Apr 3, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Apr 1, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Mar 28, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Mar 14, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  11. Mar 14, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives J. Ott, Stone, Bies, Nass and T. Larson; cosponsored by Senators Darling and Leibham

  2. Mar 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Mar 28, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 1, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 3, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Aug 1, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Aug 1, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  9. Sep 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Hebl

  10. Sep 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Hebl

  11. Sep 11, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative J. Ott

  12. Sep 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  13. Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  14. Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 7, Noes 2

  15. Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  16. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote