Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 723

Authorizing the village of Biron to allocate positive tax increments from Tax Incremental District Number 2 in the village to Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the village. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 16, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 3, 2014

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 20, 2014

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 32 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 284

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 16, 2014: “Published 4-17-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use development. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax increment base value" of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID. The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, may include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created.

Read the full summary

Under certain limited circumstances, a TID that has paid off all of its project costs but has not reached its mandatory termination date may become a donor TID, continue to receive tax increments, and forward those increments to a recipient TID created by the same city or village.

This bill creates an exception that allows TID Number 2 in the village of Biron to allocate its positive tax increments to TID Number 3 in the village.

Who's behind it

Scott Krug, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 18, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 14, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 0 · Mar 18, 2014 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 16, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 16, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 284.

  3. Apr 15, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 18, 2014

    The Senate passed it too, 32 to 0.

  5. Mar 14, 2014

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 24, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Feb 21, 2014

    The Senate received it.

  8. Feb 20, 2014

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Feb 18, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  10. Feb 18, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  11. Feb 12, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Feb 12, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Feb 3, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance.

  14. Feb 3, 2014

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Krug; cosponsored by Senator Lassa

  2. Feb 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State and Local Finance

  3. Feb 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  7. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  8. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2014 by Committee on Rules

  9. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Feb 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Feb 24, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  16. Feb 24, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  17. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  18. Mar 14, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  19. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  22. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  23. Mar 18, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  25. Mar 24, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-24-2014

  26. Apr 15, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014

  27. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 284

  28. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-17-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote