Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 74

Increasing the crime victim and witness assistance surcharge, dedicating funds for crime prevention organizations, and creating local crime prevention funding boards. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Mar 20, 2014, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 14, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 20, 2014

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, if a person commits a crime, the court that sentences the person or places the person on probation must impose a surcharge in addition to any other sentence imposed upon the person. Currently, if the person is convicted of a misdemeanor, he or she must pay $67; if the person is convicted of a felony, he or she must pay $92. The surcharge is divided three ways: part A ($40 for each misdemeanor surcharge and $65 for each felony surcharge); part B ($20 for each misdemeanor and felony surcharge); and part C ($7 for each misdemeanor and felony surcharge).

Currently, the clerk of courts collects the surcharge amounts and forwards them to the county treasurer, who in turn forwards them to the Department of Administration to help fund programs for victims and witnesses of crime. Funds from parts A and C are used to reimburse victims and witnesses and reimburse counties for victim and witness programs. Funds from part B are used to fund services for victims of sexual assault. Current law requires a person who is assessed this surcharge to pay part A in full before he or she pays part B, and both parts A and B before he or she pays part C.

Read the full summary

This bill increases the surcharge by $20 for a misdemeanor and for a felony. The bill creates a part D, which is funded by $20 for each misdemeanor or felony and which a person who is assessed the surcharge may pay only after he or she pays parts A, B, and C in full. Under the bill, the clerk of court forwards the amounts collected under part D to the county treasurer along with the other parts of the surcharge, but the treasurer retains those funds in a crime prevention fund.

Under the bill, a county treasurer deposits the funds he or she receives from part D of the surcharge into a crime prevention fund. Moneys from the fund are distributed as grants at the direction of a crime prevention funding board (CPFB).

Under the bill, a CPFB is created in every county whose treasurer receives funds from a part D surcharge. Each CPFB consists of seven members: the presiding judge of the circuit court, or his or her designee; the district attorney, or his or her designee;

the sheriff, or his or her designee; the county executive, county administrator, or county board chairperson, or his or her designee; the chief elected official of the city, village, or town with the largest population in the county, or his or her designee; a person chosen by a majority vote of the top law enforcement officials of the departments that are located in the county; and a person chosen by the county's public defender's office. Members of a CPFB may be reimbursed for expenses but may not receive any other compensation. Members serve for a term that is determined by the CPFB.

A CPFB may solicit grant applications from certain specified entities and may award grants to such entities. At least one-half of the funds must go to one or more private, nonprofit organizations that has as its primary purpose preventing crime, providing a funding source for crime prevention programs, encouraging the public to report crime, or assisting law enforcement agencies in the apprehension of criminal offenders. A CPFB may direct that the rest of the funds be distributed to a law enforcement agency that has a crime prevention fund, if the contribution is credited to the crime prevention fund and is used for crime prevention purposes. The bill requires that a CPFB and any entity that receives a grant from a CPFB must submit an annual report to certain specified entities detailing the amounts spent, the purposes for which the grants were spent, and contact information for the entity and the entity's leaders. The reports must be distributed to the clerk of court for the county that distributed the funds, the county board, and the governing bodies of the cities, villages, and towns in the county.

Who's behind it

12 lawmakers are its ⁠. 9 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 7, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 7, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 77 to 16 · Mar 20, 2014 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (77)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 77, Noes 16, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Failed, 2 to 3 · Mar 28, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence by Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform, Ayes 2, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 28, 2014

    “Report concurrence by Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform, Ayes 2, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  3. Mar 26, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  4. Mar 25, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform.

  5. Mar 24, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications.

  6. Mar 21, 2014

    The Senate received it.

  7. Mar 20, 2014

    The Assembly passed it, 77 to 16.

  8. Mar 20, 2014

    The Assembly adopted it.

  9. Feb 7, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  10. Feb 7, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 3.

  11. Apr 12, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Apr 5, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Mar 28, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Mar 25, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Mar 14, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  16. Mar 14, 2013

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Genrich, Bernier, Danou, Kahl, Kleefisch, Krug, A. Ott, Spiros, Swearingen, Tranel and Weininger; cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Hansen and Schultz

  2. Mar 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Mar 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 28, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Dec 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Jacque

  8. Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goyke

  9. Jan 29, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Goyke

  10. Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  12. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  13. Feb 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  14. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 10:03 AM on 3-20-2014 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28

  15. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  17. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 77, Noes 16, Paired 2

  20. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Mar 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Mar 24, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications

  23. Mar 25, 2014 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications and rereferred to committee on Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)

  24. Mar 26, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  25. Mar 27, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  26. Mar 28, 2014 · Senate

    Report concurrence by Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform, Ayes 2, Noes 3

  27. Mar 28, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  28. Apr 8, 2014 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote