Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

AB 747

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: creating special provisions for a city or village to create a tax incremental district in recently annexed territory. (FE)

Municipality — Annexation Property tax

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a

TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several

steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the

proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local

planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed

project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's

proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the

overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or

village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID.

The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or

village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing

costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the

allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23

years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year

in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally

make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended

termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the

expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.

Currently, before a TID may be created or its project plan amended, the city or

village must adopt a resolution containing a finding that the equalized value of

taxable property of the TID plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not

exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village

(the "12 percent test"), subject to one exception. Under the exception, a city or village

may simultaneously create a new TID and subtract territory from an existing TID

without adopting a resolution containing the 12 percent test if the city or village

demonstrates to DOR that the value of the territory that is subtracted at least equals

the amount that DOR believes is necessary to ensure that, when the new TID is

created, the 12 percent test is met. The city or village must also certify to DOR that

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Kerkman (R)

Full history

  1. Feb 10, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Kerkman

  2. Feb 10, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State and Local Finance

  3. Feb 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 14, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1