Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: the definition of project costs under the tax incremental financing program. (FE)
Motor vehicle — Parking Property tax
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a
TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several
steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the
proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local
planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed
project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID.
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or
village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing
costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. Project costs under
current law include expenditures for the construction of public works or
improvements; new buildings, structures, and fixtures; and the demolition,
alteration, remodeling, repair, or reconstruction of certain properties. For a TID
created after 1981, however, project costs do not include the cost of constructing or
expanding any facility if the city generally finances similar facilities only with utility
user fees.
Under this bill, parking structures that support redevelopment activities are
excluded from the exclusion of the cost of constructing or expanding a facility, if the
city generally finances similar facilities only with utility user fees, from the
definition of project costs.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations, Ayes 12, Noes 1
Passed 12–1 Feb 18, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 27, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 31, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 31, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0
Passed 33–0 Apr 1, 2014 official source full pageAye · 33
- Alberta Darling (8)
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dale Schultz (17)
- Dave Hansen (30)
- Frank G. Lasee (1)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Glenn Grothman (20)
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Jerry Petrowski (29)
- Joe Leibham (9)
- John Lehman (21)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Julie M. Lassa (24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (31)
- Leah Vukmir (5)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Mary Lazich (28)
- Michael Ellis (19)
- Neal Kedzie (11)
- Nikiya Harris Dodd (6)
- Paul F. Farrow (33)
- Richard Gudex (18)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Robert Jauch (25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (10)
- Terry Moulton (23)
- Thomas Tiffany (12)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
- Timothy Cullen (15)
Full history
- Feb 14, 2014 · Assembly
- Feb 14, 2014 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations
- Feb 17, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 17, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 17, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs and Government Operations, Ayes 12, Noes 1
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-20-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 21, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 24, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue
- Mar 19, 2014 · Senate
Senator Tiffany added as a cosponsor
- Mar 26, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 26, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 27, 2014 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 27, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 31, 2014 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 31, 2014 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 31, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-1-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 2, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 4-8-2014
- Apr 15, 2014 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014
- Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 299
- Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly
Published 4-17-2014