Assembly Bill 780
Eliminating voluntary intoxication as a defense to criminal liability. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 16, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 18, 2014
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 18, 2014
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 1, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 307
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 16, 2014: “Published 4-17-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, if a person is intoxicated or drugged when he or she is alleged to have committed a crime, the intoxication or drugged condition is a defense to criminal liability if: 1) the person was involuntarily intoxicated or drugged at the time of the alleged offense and the person's condition rendered him or her incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong; or 2) the person's condition, whether voluntarily or involuntarily produced, made it impossible for him or her to have had the intent necessary to commit the crime. Voluntary intoxication, however, is generally not a defense in the second situation if the offense charged is based on the person's criminal recklessness. This bill eliminates the defense of voluntary intoxication.
Who's behind it
4 lawmakers are its . All 4 are Republicans.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 8 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Tyler August · Republican, Assembly
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (4)
- Peter Barca · Democrat, Assembly
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- David Craig · Republican, Senate
- Neal Kedzie · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 0 · Mar 10, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 31, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 16, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 16, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 307.
-
Apr 15, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 1, 2014
The Senate passed it too.
-
Apr 1, 2014
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Mar 31, 2014
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 19, 2014
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Mar 19, 2014
The Senate received it.
-
Mar 18, 2014
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Mar 18, 2014
The Assembly passed it.
-
Mar 10, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 10, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.
-
Mar 4, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 27, 2014
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Feb 27, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 26, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 18, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.
-
Feb 18, 2014
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Nass, August, Bies and Jacque; cosponsored by Senator Kedzie
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Feb 26, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 27, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 27, 2014 · Assembly
Representative Craig added as a coauthor
- Mar 4, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 4, 2014 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 4, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 10, 2014 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Mar 10, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-18-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Representative Barca added as a coauthor
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 19, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 19, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Mar 19, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 31, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 31, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-1-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 2, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 4, 2014 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 4-4-2014
- Apr 15, 2014 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014
- Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 307
- Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly
Published 4-17-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote