Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 807

Procedures to preserve and determine the validity of certain liens and to make payments to prime contractors of public works contracts

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 20, 2014

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Labor. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law allows a person who provides services or goods to improve land, such as building a home, to have a claim against the land owner for the person's cost of providing the services or goods (a construction lien) if the person follows certain procedures, including providing notice of the claim to the owner. The person can then file a construction lien with the clerk of circuit court, who is required to keep a judgment and lien docket.

Currently, the notice requirement does not apply if a person provides services or goods for an improvement to land that is wholly residential in character and involves more that four family living units, or is partially or wholly nonresidential (a commercial project). In addition, certain other persons are not required to give notice of his or her claim to the land owner to maintain the right to a construction lien, including a person other than a prime contractor who works on an improvement on which the prime contractor is not required to give notice.

Read the full summary

This bill limits those who do not have to give notice of his or her claim to maintain the right to a construction lien for a commercial project to prime contractors and other claimants who have a contract with the prime contractor.

Currently, those persons who are not prime contractors and who are required to give notice to the land owner to maintain the right to a construction lien must serve the written notice on the owner or authorized agent within 60 days after providing the first services or goods.

This bill continues that requirement if the improvement involves four family units or fewer and is wholly residential in character. However, under the bill, if the improvement involves a commercial project, the persons who are required to give notice of a claim to maintain the right to a construction lien must serve the written notice on the owner or authorized agent within 45 days after providing the first services or goods.

Currently, no action may be maintained to enforce a construction lien unless the lien claimant files a claim for the lien with the office of the clerk of circuit court within six months from the date that the services or goods were last provided and then commences an action within two years of filing the claim. Current law requires the lien claimant to notify the owner of the land that he or she intends to file the claim for a lien. The lien claimant is also required under current law to serve a copy of the claim for a lien within 30 days after the filing of the lien claim.

Under this bill, after the lien is filed, the land owner or any other interested party may serve the lien claimant with a written demand that the lien claimant bring an action to determine the validity of the lien. Under the bill, if the lien claimant fails to bring that action within 90 days after being served with the demand, the lien is forfeited.

Under current law, certain contract, payment, and performance assurance requirements exist for contracts involving public improvements and public works.

Liens may also be obtained for those improvements if certain notice requirements are met. Currently, if the notice requirements are met, and the prime contractor does not dispute the claim within 30 days after service of notice of the claim by notifying the public agency and the lien claimant, the public agency is required to pay the amount of the claim and charge that amount to the prime contractor. If the prime contractor disputes the claim, current law requires the commencement of an action by the claimant or prime contractor to determine the validity of the claim.

This bill requires that if a valid lien exists regarding public improvements or public works, and the prime contractor admits the claim within 30 days after service of notice of the claim by notifying the public agency and the lien claimant, the public agency is required to pay the amount of the claim and charge that amount against what is owed to the prime contractor. If the prime contractor does not admit the claim within 30 days after receipt of the notice, this bill requires the commencement of an action by the claimant or prime contractor to determine the validity of the claim. In addition, under the bill, during the period that a claim is disputed the public agency may continue to make payments to the prime contractor provided the public agency withholds sufficient funds to pay the claim.

Who's behind it

8 lawmakers are its ⁠. 7 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (3)

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 20, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.

  3. Feb 20, 2014

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Knudson, Jacque, Weatherston, Kulp, Kaufert, Kahl and Strachota; cosponsored by Senators Olsen, Grothman and Gudex

  2. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor

  3. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor