Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 835

Limiting the security a town or municipality may require as a condition of plat approval

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 16, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 28, 2014

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 20, 2014

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 1, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 280

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 16, 2014: “Published 4-17-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a county, town, city, or village (approving authority) has the right to approve or object to plat. A plat is a map of a subdivision, which is defined under current law as a division of a unit of land by an owner for the purpose of a sale or development and the sale or development results in at least five individual parcels or building sites. Generally, the location of the subdivision determines which approving authority or authorities have the right to approve or reject the plat.

Under current law, as a condition of approval, an approving authority may require a subdivider to execute a surety bond or provide other security to ensure that certain public improvements are made in connection with a project or a phase of a project. This bill explicitly allows the subdivider to choose whether to satisfy such a requirement with a performance bond or a letter of credit. Additionally, under the bill, upon substantial completion of required public improvements, an approving authority may not require a subdivider to maintain security in an amount that is more than the total cost to complete any public improvements that are not completed plus ten percent of the total cost of the completed public improvement and may not require the subdivider to maintain the security for more than 12 months from the date the public improvements are substantially completed. The bill defines substantial completion as when the binder coat is installed on roads to be dedicated or, in a case where no roads are to be dedicated, when 90 percent of the public improvements by cost are completed.

Who's behind it

Jim Steineke, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Mar 18, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 31, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 16, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 16, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 280.

  3. Apr 15, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 1, 2014

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 31, 2014

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Mar 24, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Mar 21, 2014

    The Senate received it.

  8. Mar 20, 2014

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Mar 20, 2014

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Mar 18, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Mar 18, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  12. Mar 5, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 28, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.

  14. Feb 28, 2014

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 28, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Steineke; cosponsored by Senator Lasee

  2. Feb 28, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. Mar 5, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 13, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  6. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  7. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 10:16 AM on 3-20-2014 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28

  8. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  9. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Steineke

  10. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  11. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Mar 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Mar 24, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  17. Mar 24, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  18. Mar 31, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  19. Mar 31, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-1-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  20. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  21. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  23. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Apr 2, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  26. Apr 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-7-2014

  27. Apr 15, 2014 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014

  28. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 280

  29. Apr 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Published 4-17-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote