Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 848

Areawide water quality management planning for Dane County. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 7, 2014

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Environment and Forestry. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Federal law requires each state to have a continuing water quality planning process that is approved by the federal Environmental Protection Agency. The law requires the plans resulting from this process to include, among a number of other elements, areawide waste treatment management plans, which contain plans for the construction of sewage treatment plants and sewage collection systems.

Current state law requires the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to establish a continuing water quality management planning process that results in areawide water quality management plans for all areas of the state. The plans must include the elements required by federal law. Under DNR's rules, an areawide water quality management plan for an urban area must identify sewer service areas for a 20-year planning period.

Read the full summary

Under the rules, for some areas, DNR reviews and approves water quality management plans developed by designated local or regional agencies. DNR adopts plans for other areas, but the rules specify that preparation of plans for those areas will be carried out by local or regional planning agencies under contract with DNR, if possible.

This bill requires DNR to approve or reject proposed revisions to the areawide water quality management plan for Dane County. The bill requires DNR to base its decision on whether the proposed revision complies with water quality standards.

The bill generally requires DNR to make its decision within 90 days after a formal application for the revision is submitted. The bill allows DNR and an applicant to agree to extend the 90-day deadline. Under the bill, if DNR and the applicant do not agree to an extension and DNR does not approve or reject a proposed revision to the areawide water quality management plan for Dane County within 90 days, the proposed revision is automatically approved on the 120th day, unless before that day DNR petitions the circuit court for an order extending the time for DNR to act on the revision. The court may grant an extension for a period it determines to be reasonable.

The bill authorizes DNR to contract with a regional planning commission or other entity, except Dane County or any of its subunits, including the Dane County Lakes and Watershed Commission, to provide advisory services relating to the review of proposed revisions to the areawide water quality management plan for Dane County, but specifies that DNR may not delegate its authority to approve or reject revisions. The bill also provides that Dane County and any of its subunits, including the Dane County Lakes and Watershed Commission, may not be designated to develop the areawide water quality management plan for Dane County.

Who's behind it

7 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 7 are Republicans.

See all 7 names

Authors (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 27, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Mar 7, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Environment and Forestry.

  4. Mar 7, 2014

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jagler, Ripp, Nass, Brooks, Kleefisch, Thiesfeldt and Nygren

  2. Mar 7, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Environment and Forestry

  3. Mar 27, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate