Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 874

Labeling of genetically engineered food and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 18, 2014

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Genetic engineering This bill imposes requirements relating to the labeling of food that is produced through genetic engineering. The bill defines "genetic engineering" as the alteration of the genetic material of an organism using specified techniques, including recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) techniques, techniques that involve the introduction into an organism of hereditary materials prepared outside of the organism, such as through microinjection, and techniques that involve the fusion of cells in a way that does not occur naturally.

The requirements in the bill take effect one year after the bill is enacted.

Read the full summary

Labeling The bill generally prohibits a retailer, such as a grocer, from selling a packaged food produced through genetic engineering unless the package is clearly labeled to indicate that the food is produced through genetic engineering. The bill generally prohibits a retailer from selling an unpackaged food produced through genetic engineering unless the retailer places on the shelf or bin where the food is sold a sign indicating that the food is produced through genetic engineering.

The bill also generally prohibits a retailer from selling a food produced through genetic engineering that is labeled as "natural."

Exemptions The bill contains a number of exemptions to the labeling requirements, including those described below.

Under the bill, the labeling requirements do not apply to food that is produced from an animal that was not genetically engineered, regardless of whether the animal was fed or injected with a food or drug produced through genetic engineering.

The labeling requirements do not apply to unpackaged food that is sold in a restaurant or is prepared and sold for takeout, for example, in a grocery store. The bill also exempts from the labeling requirements, until July 1, 2020, processed foods that contain ten or fewer ingredients produced through genetic engineering if the weight of each is not more than 0.45 percent of the weight of the food.

The bill allows a retailer to rely on a sworn statement from a supplier that a food was not knowingly produced through genetic engineering or on a determination by an independent organization, based on sampling and testing, that a food was not produced through genetic engineering. The bill requires the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to promulgate rules specifying requirements for sampling and testing by independent organizations.

Who's behind it

5 representatives are its ⁠. All 5 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (3)

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 18, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

  3. Mar 18, 2014

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives C. Taylor, Clark, Genrich, Ohnstad and Wright; cosponsored by Senators Risser, Erpenbach and Harris

  2. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor