Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 900

Energy supply and demand study and electric utility integrated resource plans. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 31, 2014

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 18, 2014: “Fiscal estimate received”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires each investor-owned electric public utility (electric utility) to prepare and submit an integrated resource plan to the Public Service Commission (PSC). The bill defines "integrated resource plan" as a 20-year plan of an electric utility for doing all of the following: 1) meeting forecasted demand for electric energy through a combination of supply-side and demand-side resources; 2) evaluating certain costs in meeting the forecasted demand; 3) identifying the mix of resources that would minimize future energy system costs and ensure safe and reliable electric service; and 4) decreasing the use of imported fossil fuel, increasing energy efficiency, and reducing electric bills. Regarding the second item, the costs that must be evaluated are those associated with the options specified in the state energy priorities law, which prioritizes options for meeting energy demands.

The bill requires an electric utility to submit an integrated resource plan to the PSC no later than July 1, 2016. If the PSC determines that an electric utility's plan satisfies the above definition, the PSC must approve the plan. However, if the PSC determines that the plan does not satisfy the definition, the PSC must order the electric utility to make revisions and resubmit the plan for the PSC's approval. Also, before approving a plan, the bill requires the PSC to provide an opportunity for the public to comment on the plan. In addition, the PSC must make approved plans available to the public through the PSC's Internet site.

Read the full summary

The bill also requires the PSC to submit an energy study report to the legislature no later than July 1, 2017. The report must do all of the following: 1) assess current and future energy supply and demand; 2) evaluate the integrated resource plans submitted under the bill; 3) demonstrate how the PSC considered the integrated resource plans in assessing energy supply and demand; 4) evaluate the costs of meeting future energy demand that are associated with the options specified in the state's energy priorities law; 5) examine policies under state law, rules, and orders affecting energy supply and demand; 6) make a comparative analysis of those policies with policies in other states; and 7) identify challenges and opportunities for ensuring that energy supply adequately meets energy demand. In preparing the report, the bill requires the PSC to consult with the Department of Administration and the Department of Natural Resources.

Who's behind it

2 representatives are its ⁠. All 2 are Democrats.

See all 2 names

Authors (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 18, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  2. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  3. Mar 31, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.

  4. Mar 31, 2014

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 31, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Shankland and Clark

  2. Mar 31, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  4. Apr 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate