Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Assembly Bill 908

The creation of a Southeastern Regional Transit Authority and a Milwaukee Transit Authority and making appropriations. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 3, 2014

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2014: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Transportation. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

The 2009 Biennial Budget Act ( 2009 Act 28 ) authorized the creation of several regional transit authorities (RTAs): the Dane County RTA, the Chippewa Valley RTA, and the Chequamegon Bay RTA. Under 2009 Act 28 , each RTA, once created, was a public body corporate and politic and a separate governmental entity. Among its powers, an RTA could operate a transportation system or provide for its operation by contracting with a public or private organization; impose, by its board of directors adopting a resolution, a sales and use tax in the RTA's jurisdictional area at a rate not exceeding 0.5 percent of the sales price if certain conditions were satisfied;

acquire property by condemnation; and issue tax-exempt revenue bonds. An RTA had a duty to provide, or contract for the provision of, transit service within the RTA's jurisdictional area.

Read the full summary

Prior to 2009 Act 28 , the counties of Kenosha, Racine, and Milwaukee were required to create a Regional Transit Authority (the KRM authority). The KRM authority was responsible for the coordination of transit and commuter rail programs within these three counties but had no authority to manage or operate any transit system. The KRM authority was authorized to impose a rental car transaction fee within these three counties, which fee was to be used to hire staff, conduct studies, and prepare a report to the legislature and the governor, due by November 15, 2008.

Act 28 terminated the KRM authority as of October 1, 2009, and created a successor entity, the Southeastern Regional Transit Authority (SERTA). The SERTA was a public body corporate and politic and a separate governmental entity; it consisted of the counties of Kenosha, Racine, and Milwaukee. The jurisdictional area of the SERTA was the geographic area formed by the combined territorial boundaries of the counties of Kenosha, Racine, and Milwaukee. The powers of the SERTA were vested in its board of directors. The SERTA's powers were limited but included all powers necessary and convenient to create, construct, and manage a commuter rail transit system connecting the cities of Kenosha, Racine, and Milwaukee (KRM commuter rail line). Upon approval by its board of directors, the SERTA could impose a rental car transaction fee, in the counties of Kenosha, Racine, and Milwaukee, of not more than $18 per transaction, except that the SERTA's board of directors could have this fee annually adjusted for inflation. From each rental car transaction fee, the SERTA could retain not more than $2 per transaction for administration of the SERTA and could retain the remainder for expenditures related to the KRM commuter rail line, including planning, construction, maintenance, operations, and engineering expenditures. The SERTA was the only entity in the counties of Milwaukee, Racine, and Kenosha that could submit an application to the Federal Transit Administration under the federal New Starts Grant Program for funding for the KRM commuter rail line (New Starts application).

The 2011 Biennial Budget Act ( 2011 Act 32 ) eliminated authorization to create an RTA, eliminated the SERTA, and dissolved the Dane County RTA, the Chippewa Valley RTA, and the Chequamegon Bay RTA to the extent previously created.

This bill recreates the SERTA, with modifications, and allows the Milwaukee County board to create a Milwaukee Transit Authority (MTA), a public body corporate and politic and a separate governmental entity. Once created, the MTA's jurisdictional area is Milwaukee County. The MTA's authority is vested in its board of directors and its bylaws govern its management, operations, and administration.

The MTA's board of directors must annually prepare a budget and have its financial statements audited. The MTA's revenues can be used only for the expenses and specific purposes of the MTA.

Upon creation, the MTA and the Milwaukee County board must contract for the MTA to provide, beginning on January 1, 2015, or as soon after creation of the MTA as is reasonably feasible, whichever is later, transit service and transit planning in Milwaukee County. The MTA must be provided sales and use tax revenues from Milwaukee County (discussed below). The MTA has all powers necessary and convenient to carry out its purpose, but the MTA's powers are limited to those provided by statute.

If the MTA is created, then upon approval of a New Starts application, the MTA must begin the process of winding down and dissolving and must complete this process within 120 days. The SERTA then becomes the successor to the MTA. As part of the winding down of the MTA, the MTA's assets and liabilities become the assets and liabilities of the SERTA and the MTA's tangible personal property is transferred to the SERTA. In addition, the MTA's contracts are transferred to the SERTA, except that the MTA's contract with Milwaukee County to provide transit service in Milwaukee County terminates. Responsibility for providing transit service and transit planning in Milwaukee County is then assumed by the SERTA, which must provide transit service in Milwaukee County in the same manner applicable to Kenosha County and Racine County (discussed below).

If Milwaukee County creates an MTA, the bill requires Milwaukee County to also adopt an ordinance to impose a sales and use tax at the rate of 0.5 percent of the sales price or purchase price. These tax revenues must be distributed to the MTA and Milwaukee County cannot levy property taxes for transit purposes. In addition, Milwaukee County must indicate on property tax bills the amount of the reduction in property taxes associated with this requirement to remove transit expenditures from the property tax levy. However, when the MTA is wound down and dissolved and responsibility for transit is assumed by SERTA, the tax revenues must be distributed to the SERTA.

This bill, in recreating the SERTA, also makes modifications to the SERTA as it existed before 2011 Act 32 , including the following:

1. The SERTA consists of both the counties and cities of Kenosha, Racine, and Milwaukee, not just the counties. The SERTA also includes any municipality within these counties that operates a transit system receiving state transit aids.

2. Beginning on January 1, 2015, the SERTA must assume responsibility for providing transit service and transit planning in Kenosha County and Racine County. If an MTA is created and then wound down and dissolved (upon approval of a New Starts application), the SERTA also assumes responsibility for providing transit service and transit planning in Milwaukee County. The SERTA may also provide transit service outside its jurisdictional area if such transit service would benefit residents within the SERTA's jurisdictional area. In lieu of directly providing transit service, the SERTA may contract with existing transit providers for the provision of transit service. The SERTA can also acquire a transit system by entering into a transfer agreement with the owner of the system. The SERTA has all powers necessary and convenient to carry out these responsibilities, including the power to apply for and utilize state and federal funds.

3. If any county transfers sales tax revenues to the SERTA, the SERTA can expend these funds only in the county in which the revenues were generated and only for purposes of providing transit service or transit planning in that county. These funds cannot be expended for purposes related to the KRM commuter rail line.

4. The SERTA may use a portion of its rental car transaction fee, as well as state transit aids, to provide incentive funds to the cities of Kenosha and Racine. The SERTA must provide $2,500,000 in incentive funds to each of the cities of Kenosha and Racine if the city commits to support the SERTA's provision of transit service, from city property tax revenues, at then-current operating levels and at inflation-adjusted future operating levels.

5. The SERTA must develop goals and criteria for increasing transit service, increasing connectivity among transit systems, and reducing passenger fare support for transit. The SERTA must evaluate success in achieving these goals and meeting these criteria.

6. The bonding limit for revenue bonds issued by SERTA is increased from $50,000,000 to $250,000,000. After January 1, 2015, the SERTA also has additional authority to use revenue bond proceeds for transit systems where the SERTA provides transit service.

7. A KRM commuter rail line cannot include a stop in any municipality in the SERTA's jurisdictional area unless the municipality has a sustainable mechanism to help fund local transit and the municipality is a member of the SERTA.

8. The SERTA is the only entity in southeast Wisconsin that may submit a New Starts application for funding for any purpose.

9. The bill clarifies that SERTA may operate the KRM commuter rail line itself or may contract for a rail service to operate the KRM commuter rail line.

The bill also includes the following relating to SERTA and the MTA, if created:

1. The SERTA has authority to acquire property by condemnation.

2. Employees of the SERTA and of the MTA are participatory employees under the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) if the SERTA and the MTA, respectively, elect to join the WRS.

3. Employees of the MTA and SERTA are covered by the Municipal Employment Relations Act (MERA). MERA provides that all matters relating to wages, hours, and conditions of employment are subject to collective bargaining and all municipal employees are expressly granted the right to self-organize and to bargain collectively through a representative of their choice.

4. The MTA and SERTA are "local governmental units" for purposes of the prevailing wage and hour law. Under current law, certain workers employed on a public works project contracted by a local governmental unit must be paid at the rate paid for a majority of the hours worked in the person's trade or occupation in the county in which the project is located, as determined by the Department of Workforce Development, and may not be required or permitted to work more than ten hours per day and 40 hours per week, unless they are paid 1.5 times their basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of those hours.

5. MTA and SERTA property is not subject to state and local property taxes.

6. The SERTA and the MTA are treated like municipalities, counties, and other political subdivisions for purposes of claims and liability resulting from the negligent operation of a motor vehicle and may participate in organizing municipal insurance mutuals to provide insurance and risk management services.

7. The SERTA can enter into intergovernmental cooperation contracts with other governmental units.

Who's behind it

4 representatives are its ⁠. All 4 are Democrats.

See all 4 names

Authors (4)

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2014

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 3, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  3. Apr 3, 2014

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Mason, Barca, Ohnstad and Sinicki

  2. Apr 3, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor