Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: prohibiting certain telephone calls using electronically prerecorded messages, rules for requesting a listing in the nonsolicitation directory, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Data processing Telephone
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law regulates "telephone solicitation," which is defined as the
unsolicited initiation of a telephone conversation or text message for the purpose of
encouraging the recipient of the telephone call to purchase property, goods, or
services. Generally, under current law, a telephone solicitor may not make a
telephone solicitation to a residential customer if the customer's telephone number
is included in a nonsolicitation directory maintained by the Department of
Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) listing residential customers
who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations. Current law also prohibits a
telephone solicitor from using an electronically prerecorded message in a telephone
solicitation made to any recipient without the recipient's consent. Nonprofit
organizations are not subject to current law regulating telephone solicitations.
This bill prohibits any person from using an electronically prerecorded message
in an unsolicited telephone call to a residential customer whose telephone number
is included in the nonsolicitation directory, subject to the following exceptions: 1) a
call initiated by a school or school district to a student, a parent of a student, or an
employee; 2) a call initiated to a residential customer by a person who has a current
business or personal relationship with the customer; 3) a call initiated by a
governmental unit that is intended to alert a recipient of the call to a danger to the
recipient's health or safety; 4) a call initiated by a college or university to a graduate
of the college or university; and 5) a call initiated by a debt collector for the purpose
of collecting a debt.
Under the bill, DATCP must promulgate rules requiring any person who uses,
or requires an employee or contractor to use, an electronically prerecorded message
in a telephone call to a residential customer in this state, other than a call covered
by one of the exceptions in the bill, to register with and pay a fee to DATCP. A
registration is valid for one year and may be renewed upon payment of a renewal fee
to DATCP. Under the bill, registration and renewal fees for persons who use
electronically prerecorded messages must equal the fees charged for a telephone
solicitor under current law, except that the fees for nonprofit organizations may not
exceed one-tenth of the fee charged for a telephone solicitor.
Current law requires DATCP to promulgate rules establishing requirements
and procedures for a residential customer to request a listing in the nonsolicitation
directory. The rules must require a residential customer who requests a listing in
the directory to biennially notify DATCP if the residential customer wishes to
continue to be included in the directory. If a residential customer fails to make the
biennial notification, DATCP must eliminate the residential customer from the
nonsolicitation directory.
Under the bill, DATCP must promulgate rules establishing requirements and
procedures for a residential customer to request a listing in the nonsolicitation
directory, but the rules may not require a residential customer to periodically renew
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and Government Operations and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 53
Failed 38–53 Mar 20, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 26, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Nerison, Hintz, Bernard Schaber, Bernier, Bies, Endsley, Kestell, Kolste, Kooyenga, Marklein, Murphy, Mursau, Murtha, Ohnstad, Petryk, Pope, Ringhand, Sargent and Vruwink; cosponsored by Senators Harsdorf, Leibham, Carpenter, Cowles, Cullen, Lehman, Olsen, Risser and Schultz
- Mar 26, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations and State Licensing
- Apr 18, 2013 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 28, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Jacque
- Oct 17, 2013 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Government Operations and State Licensing and referred to committee on State Affairs and Government Operations pursuant to Assembly Resolution 19
- Nov 4, 2013 · Assembly
Representative Thiesfeldt added as a coauthor
- Mar 6, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on State Affairs and Government Operations and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 53
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1