Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: temporary service by a court of appeals judge in the supreme court in judicial disciplinary proceedings (first consideration).
Constitutional amendments — First consideration Judge Judge — Appellate court Supreme court Swanson, robert s
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Adopted, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Article VII, section 11, of the Wisconsin Constitution, provides that justices and
judges are subject to reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal for cause or for
disability by the supreme court pursuant to procedures established by the
legislature. Article VII, section 4 (3), of the Wisconsin Constitution, prohibits the
temporary appointment of a court of appeals judge or circuit court judge to the
supreme court.
This constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2013 legislature on first
consideration, requires that the supreme court assign on a temporary basis a court
of appeals judge to aid in the proper disposition of judicial disciplinary proceedings
in the supreme court to provide an odd number of justices for the consideration of the
proceedings. The person assigned must be the most senior court of appeals judge
eligible to be assigned.
Under current statutory law, the judicial commission is charged with
investigating the alleged misconduct or permanent disability of a judge. If the
judicial commission finds probable cause that a judge is engaging or has engaged in
misconduct, it files a formal complaint with the supreme court. If the judicial
commission finds probable cause that a judge has a permanent disability, it files a
petition with the supreme court [s. 757.85, stats.].
After the judicial commission finds probable cause of misconduct or permanent
disability and before it files a complaint or petition, the matter is heard by a panel
consisting of either three court of appeals judges or two court of appeals judges and
one reserve judge or by a jury. The supreme court reviews the findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and recommendations submitted following the hearing and
determines appropriate discipline or action [ss. 757.87 and 757.91, stats.].
This amendment was prepared for the Joint Legislative Council's 2010 Special
Committee on Judicial Discipline and Recusal.
A constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures,
and ratification by the people, before it becomes effective.
Sponsors
Full history
- Apr 15, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Richards, Pasch, Wachs, Zepnick, Mason, Billings, Berceau, C. Taylor, Wright and Ohnstad; cosponsored by Senators Lehman and T. Cullen
- Apr 15, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Jun 14, 2013 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Judiciary and referred to committee on Government Operations and State Licensing pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)
- Oct 17, 2013 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Government Operations and State Licensing and referred to committee on State Affairs and Government Operations pursuant to Assembly Resolution 19
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1