Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 135

Annual or consecutive month permits for vehicles or combinations of vehicles transporting loads near the Wisconsin-Michigan border. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Jul 8, 2013. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 10, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed May 7, 2013

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jun 6, 2013

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 34

Latest entry in the official record, Jul 8, 2013: “Published 7-6-2013”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, with limited exceptions, no person may operate on a highway any vehicle or combination of vehicles (vehicle) that exceeds certain statutory limits on size, weight, or load unless that person possesses a permit issued by the Department of Transportation (DOT). DOT may issue an annual or consecutive month permit (Michigan border permit) for an oversize or overweight vehicle to: 1) transport loads within 11 miles of the Wisconsin-Michigan state line;

2) transport certain forest products on USH 2 in Iron County or Ashland County or in Bayfield County from the Ashland County line through Hart Lake Road, if the vehicle is traveling between this state and Michigan and does not violate Michigan law, as of April 28, 2004; or 3) transport certain forest products on USH 2 from STH 13 in the city of Ashland through Hart Lake Road in Bayfield County, regardless of whether the vehicle is traveling between this state and Michigan.

Read the full summary

This bill allows a vehicle operating under a Michigan border permit as provided in item 2), above, to also operate in Florence County. Also under the bill, the vehicle's operation must be in compliance with current provisions of Michigan law, rather than Michigan law as of April 28, 2004.

Under current law, if any bill introduced in either house of the legislature directly or indirectly establishes an exception to vehicle weight limitations, DOT must prepare a report, containing specified information, relating to the bill within six weeks after the bill is introduced and before any vote is taken on the bill. This bill directs DOT not to prepare such a report on this bill because current law already allows the same loads to be transported on USH 2 in other counties.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. 2 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

15 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (15)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · May 3, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 15 to 0 · May 24, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Jul 8, 2013

    The new law was published.

  2. Jul 8, 2013

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 34.

  3. Jul 3, 2013

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jun 6, 2013

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. May 24, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. May 24, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  7. May 17, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  8. May 7, 2013

    The Assembly received it.

  9. May 7, 2013

    The Senate passed it.

  10. May 3, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. May 2, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Apr 25, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Apr 16, 2013

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  14. Apr 10, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs.

  15. Apr 10, 2013

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 10, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Petrowski, Tiffany, Jauch and Lassa; cosponsored by Representatives Swearingen, Mursau, Ballweg, Bernier, Bewley, Bies, Jagler, T. Larson, Murtha, Nygren, A. Ott, Ripp, Spiros and Wright

  2. Apr 10, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs

  3. Apr 16, 2013 · Senate

    Senator Grothman added as a coauthor

  4. Apr 25, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. May 2, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 3, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. May 3, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. May 3, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. May 6, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-7-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. May 7, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. May 7, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. May 7, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  13. May 7, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  14. May 7, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. May 7, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  16. May 17, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  17. May 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  18. May 24, 2013 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  19. May 24, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  20. Jun 4, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-6-2013 by Committee on Rules

  21. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Jun 6, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Jun 7, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Jun 17, 2013 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. Jul 3, 2013 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 7-3-2013

  29. Jul 8, 2013 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 7-5-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 34

  30. Jul 8, 2013 · Senate

    Published 7-6-2013

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote