Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: authorizing the circuit court to order a person who engages in discrimination in employment, unfair honesty testing, or unfair genetic testing to pay compensatory and punitive damages. (FE)
Circuit court Damage _personal injury_ Discrimination in employment Genetics and genetic testing Lie detector Workforce development, department of
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current fair employment law, a person alleging discrimination in
employment or unfair honesty or genetic testing may file a complaint with the
Department of Workforce Development (DWD) seeking action that will effectuate
the purpose of the fair employment law, including reinstating the employee,
providing back pay, and paying costs and attorney fees. The fair employment law,
however, does not authorize DWD to award compensatory or punitive damages to a
complainant.
This bill permits DWD or a person who has been discriminated against or
subjected to unfair honesty or genetic testing to bring an action in circuit court to
recover compensatory and punitive damages caused by the act of discrimination or
unfair honesty or genetic testing after the completion of all administrative
proceedings before DWD and the Labor and Industry Review Commission
concerning the violation. Those damages are in addition to any back pay or other
amounts awarded in the administrative proceeding. The bill, however, does not
permit an action for damages to be brought against any local governmental unit or
against any employer employing fewer than 15 individuals.
Under the bill, if the circuit court finds that a defendant has committed an act
of discrimination or unfair honesty or genetic testing, the circuit court must order the
defendant to pay to the person discriminated against compensatory and punitive
damages in an amount that the circuit court finds appropriate, subject to the
following limitations:
1. If the defendant employs 100 or fewer employees, $50,000.
2. If the defendant employs more than 100 but fewer than 201 employees,
$100,000.
3. If the defendant employs more than 200 but fewer than 501 employees,
$200,000.
4. If the defendant employs more than 500 employees, $300,000.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: C. Larson (D) , Carpenter (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Harris (D) , Jauch (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Lassa (D) , Lehman (D) , Miller (D) , Risser (D) , Shilling (D) , T. Cullen (D) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)
39 cosponsors
Barca (D) , Barnes (D) , Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Bewley (D) , Billings (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Clark (D) , Danou (D) , Doyle (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Hulsey (D) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kahl (D) , Kessler (D) , Kolste (D) , Mason (D) , Milroy (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pasch (D) , Pope (D) , Richards (D) , Riemer (D) , Ringhand (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Smith (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wachs (D) , Wright (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Senate: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 14, Noes 18
Failed 14–18 Feb 18, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 17, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Hansen, Lehman, Harris, Vinehout, Wirch, Lassa, Shilling, Carpenter, Miller, L. Taylor, Risser, C. Larson, T. Cullen, Erpenbach and Jauch; cosponsored by Representatives Sinicki, Kahl, Barca, Barnes, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bewley, Billings, Clark, Danou, Doyle, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Hulsey, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kessler, Kolste, Mason, Milroy, Ohnstad, Pasch, Pope, Richards, Riemer, Ringhand, Sargent, Shankland, Smith, C. Taylor, Vruwink, Wachs, Wright, Young, Zamarripa and Zepnick
- Apr 17, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Labor
- May 1, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 14, Noes 18
- Apr 8, 2014 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1