Senate Bill 155
The prohibition on telephone solicitations to residential customers, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 9, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Apr 25, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 33 to 0
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 98 to 0
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 234
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 9, 2014: “Published 4-9-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law regulates "telephone solicitation," which is defined as the unsolicited initiation of a telephone conversation or text message for the purpose of encouraging the recipient of the telephone call or text message to purchase property, goods, or services. Current law generally prohibits a telephone solicitor, or employee or contractor of a telephone solicitor, from making a telephone solicitation to a residential customer if the customer's landline or wireless telephone number is included in a nonsolicitation directory maintained by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP), which lists residential customers who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations. Current law exempts the following from the prohibition: 1) telephone solicitations made by nonprofit organizations; 2) telephone solicitations made in response to a recipient's request; and 3) telephone solicitations made to current clients of the person selling property, goods, or services that are the reason for the solicitation. Current law requires DATCP to promulgate rules requiring that telephone solicitors register with DATCP and pay initial registration and annual registration renewal fees to DATCP, which DATCP must use for establishing and maintaining the nonsolicitation directory, as well as for consumer protection, information, and education. Current law prohibits a telephone solicitor who is not registered from requiring that employees or contractors make telephone solicitations in this state. Current law also provides that if a residential customer does not biennially renew his or her listing in the nonsolicitation directory, DATCP must eliminate the customer's telephone number from the directory.
Federal law also regulates telephone solicitations by authorizing the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to prohibit deceptive and abusive telemarketing acts or practices. Under that authority, the FTC has promulgated a regulation that, with certain exceptions, prohibits a telemarketer from initiating a telephone call encouraging the purchase of goods or services if the recipient's telephone number is on a national "do-not-call" registry maintained by the FTC that consists of the telephone numbers of persons who do not wish to receive such calls. One of the exceptions applies to telemarketing calls to businesses. Federal law requires telemarketers to pay annual fees in order to access the registry. The FTC allows a person to add a landline or wireless telephone number to the registry through a toll-free number or over the Internet. Under federal law, inclusion of a telephone number in the registry is permanent and a person is not required to periodically renew the inclusion. However, a person may remove a telephone number from the registry and the FTC must periodically review the registry and remove telephone numbers that have been disconnected or reassigned to another person.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill eliminates the state's nonsolicitation directory and instead prohibits a telephone solicitor, or employee or contractor of a telephone solicitor, from making a telephone solicitation, as defined under current state law, to a landline or wireless telephone number that is included on a "state do-not-call registry," which the bill defines as the portion of the national do-not-call registry that consists of telephone numbers with Wisconsin area codes. The bill allows DATCP to cooperate with the FTC to add telephone numbers that were in the state's nonsolicitation directory to the national do-not-call registry. The bill's prohibition is subject to the same exemptions as the prohibition under current state law. The bill requires DATCP to publicize the procedures for a residential customer to add a telephone number to the national do-not-call registry.
The bill also provides that the initial registration and annual registration renewal fees that are paid by telephone solicitors must be used for DATCP's administration and enforcement of the requirements applicable to telephone solicitors, as well as for consumer protection, information, and education. The bill allows DATCP to base the amount of a fee that a telephone solicitor must pay on a methodology established by rule, in addition to basing the amount on the number of telephone lines used by the telephone solicitor to make solicitations, which is the basis allowed under current law. In addition, the bill requires that DATCP's rules require a telephone solicitor to provide DATCP with proof that the telephone solicitor has complied with federal law in obtaining copies or updated versions of the state do-not-call registry. The proof must be provided upon initial registration and annual renewal, as well as any other time upon DATCP's request. Finally, the bill prohibits a telephone solicitor from using or possessing a copy or updated version of the state do-not-call registry that the telephone solicitor has obtained in violation of federal law.
Who's behind it
6 senators are its . All 6 are Republicans.
21 more lawmakers .
See all 27 names Hide the names
Authors (6)
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Richard Gudex · Republican, Senate
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (21)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Czaja · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Endsley · Republican, Assembly
- Dianne Hesselbein · Democrat, Senate
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- John Jagler · Republican, Senate
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Larson · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 6 votes on this bill.
Senate vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · May 29, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 14, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 18 to 15 · Oct 15, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 33 to 0 · Oct 15, 2013
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (33)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- John Lehman (D, 21)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Nikiya Harris Dodd (D, 6)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Richard Gudex (R, 18)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 98 to 0 · Jan 21, 2014 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (98)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alvin Ott (R, 3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (D, 70)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Andy Jorgensen (D, 43)
- Bill Kramer (R, 97)
- Bob Kulp (R, 69)
- Brett Hulsey (D, 78)
- Chad Weininger (R, 4)
- Chris Danou (D, 92)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Cory Mason (D, 66)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dana Wachs (D, 91)
- Daniel LeMahieu (R, 59)
- Daniel Riemer (D, 7)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Dean Knudson (R, 30)
- Debra Kolste (D, 44)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Don Pridemore (R, 22)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Eric Genrich (D, 90)
- Erik Severson (R, 28)
- Evan Goyke (D, 18)
- Fred Clark (D, 81)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Garey Bies (R, 1)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Sanfelippo (R, 15)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- John Klenke (R, 88)
- John Murtha (R, 29)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Jon Richards (D, 19)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Katrina Shankland (D, 71)
- Keith Ripp (R, 42)
- Ken Skowronski (R, 82)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Mandela Barnes (D, 11)
- Mandy Wright (D, 85)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Mary Czaja (R, 35)
- Mary Williams (R, 87)
- Melissa Sargent (D, 48)
- Michael Schraa (R, 53)
- Mike Endsley (R, 26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Pat Strachota (R, 58)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (D, 57)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robb Kahl (D, 47)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Sandy Pasch (D, 10)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Stephen Smith (D, 75)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Steve Kestell (R, 27)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
- Thomas Larson (R, 67)
- Thomas Weatherston (R, 62)
- Tod Ohnstad (D, 65)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
Didn't vote (1)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 98, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 9, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 9, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 234.
-
Apr 7, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 21, 2014
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jan 21, 2014
The Assembly passed it too, 98 to 0.
-
Oct 22, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 16, 2013
The Assembly received it.
-
Oct 15, 2013
The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.
-
Oct 14, 2013
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 14, 2013
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
May 29, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
May 21, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 17, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 25, 2013
Sent to the Senate Committee on Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform.
-
Apr 25, 2013
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Apr 25, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Tiffany, Cowles, Olsen, Gudex, Petrowski and Harsdorf; cosponsored by Representatives Ripp, Marklein, Jagler, Brooks, Bies, T. Larson, Bernier, Murphy, Mursau, Czaja, Endsley, Sinicki, Strachota, Hintz, A. Ott, Ohnstad, Spiros, Tranel, Jacque and Tittl
- Apr 25, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform
- May 17, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 21, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing held
- May 29, 2013 · Senate
Executive action taken
- May 29, 2013 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Energy, Consumer Protection, and Government Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- May 29, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-15-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Erpenbach
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 18, Noes 15
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 16, 2013 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Oct 22, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 16, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-21-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 98, Noes 0
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Representative Hesselbein added as a cosponsor
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 21, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 10, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 7, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-7-2014
- Apr 9, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 234
- Apr 9, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-9-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote