Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

SB 220

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made for Tax Incremental District Number 1 in the village of Wales. (FE)

Property tax Revenue, department of Waukesha county Wetland

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a

TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several

steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the

proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local

planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed

project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's

proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the

overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or

village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID.

The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or

village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing

costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the

allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23

years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year

in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally

make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended

termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the

expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.

Under this bill, with regard to TID number 1 in the village of Wales,

expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 27 years after the TID was

created and DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 37 years after the TID's

creation.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Farrow (R)

1 cosponsors

Kapenga (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Sep 25, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Sep 25, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 7, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 7, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 14, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Farrow; cosponsored by Representative Kapenga

  2. Jun 14, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue

  3. Jun 27, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 16, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Farrow

  5. Sep 18, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Sep 25, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Sep 25, 2013 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Sep 25, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Sep 25, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Oct 7, 2013 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 7, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-8-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Oct 7, 2013 · Senate

    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  18. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Oct 9, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Oct 22, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  21. Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2013 by Committee on Rules

  22. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Nov 6, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  28. Nov 15, 2013 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  29. Dec 12, 2013 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 12-12-2013

  30. Dec 16, 2013 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-13-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 90

  31. Dec 16, 2013 · Senate

    Published 12-14-2013