Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 223

Employer access to, and observation of, the personal Internet accounts of employees and applicants for employment; educational institution access to, and observation of, the personal Internet accounts of students and prospective students; landlord access to, and observation of, the personal Internet accounts of tenants and prospective tenants; and providing a penalty. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 9, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 27, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 12, 2013

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 21, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 208

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 9, 2014: “Published 4-9-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law does not regulate employer access to, or observation of, the personal Internet accounts of employees and applicants for employment, or educational institution access to, or observation of, the personal Internet accounts of students and prospective students, or landlord access to, or observation of, the personal Internet accounts of tenants and prospective tenants.

This bill prohibits an employer, educational institution, or landlord from: 1) requesting an employee, applicant for employment, student, prospective student, tenant, or prospective tenant to grant access to, allow observation of, or disclose information that allows access to or observation of the personal Internet account of the employee, applicant, student, prospective student, tenant, or prospective tenant;

Read the full summary

and 2) discharging, expelling, suspending, disciplining, or otherwise penalizing or discriminating against any person for exercising the right to refuse such a a request, opposing such a a practice, filing a complaint or attempting to enforce that right, or testifying or assisting in any action or proceeding to enforce that right.

The bill, however, permits an employer, educational institution, or landlord to view, access, or use information about an employee, applicant for employment, student, prospective student, tenant, or prospective tenant that can be obtained without access information or that is available from the public domain.

The bill also permits an employer or educational institution to request or require an employee or student to disclose access information to the employer or educational institution in order for the employer or educational institution to gain access to or operate an electronic communications device paid for in whole or in part by the employer or educational institution or to gain access to an account or service that is provided by the employer or educational institution, that the employee or student obtained by virtue of the employment relationship or admission to the educational institution, or that is used for business or educational purposes.

The bill, in addition, permits an employer to do any of the following:

1. Discharge or discipline an employee for transferring the employer's proprietary or confidential information or financial data to the employee's personal Internet account without the employer's authorization.

2. Conduct an investigation or require an employee to cooperate in an investigation of any alleged unauthorized transfer of the employer's proprietary or confidential information or financial data to the employee's personal Internet account or of any other alleged employment-related misconduct or violation of the law.

3. Restrict or prohibit an employee's access to certain Internet sites while using an electronic communications device paid for in whole or in part by the employer or while using the employer's network or other resources.

4. Monitor, review, or access electronic data that is stored on an electronic communications device paid for in whole or in part by the employer or electronic data that is traveling through or stored on the employer's network.

5. Comply with a duty to screen applicants for employment prior to hiring that is established under state or federal law or by a self-regulatory organization, as defined under the federal Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (self-regulatory organization).

6. Requesting or requiring an employee to disclose the employee's personal electronic mail address.

In addition, with respect to an employer, the bill provides that the prohibition created under the bill does not apply to a personal Internet account or an electronic communications device of an employee engaged in providing financial services who uses the account or device to conduct the business of an employer that is subject to the content, supervision, and retention requirements imposed by federal securities laws and regulations or by a self-regulatory organization.

Finally, the bill provides that an employer, educational institution, or landlord does not have a duty to search or monitor the activity of any personal Internet account and that an employer, educational institution, or landlord is not liable for any failure to request or require access to or observation of a personal Internet account of an employee, applicant for employment, student, prospective student, tenant, or prospective tenant.

For purposes of the bill: 1) "access information" means a user name and password, login information, or any other security information that protects access to a personal Internet account; 2) "educational institution" means an institution of higher education, a technical college, a proprietary school, a public school, a charter school, a private school, or a private educational testing service or administrator; 3) "employer" includes the state; and 4) "personal Internet account" means an account created and used exclusively for personal purposes within a bounded system established by an Internet-based service that requires a user to input or store access information via an electronic device in order to view, create, use, or edit the user's account information, profile, display, communications, or stored data.

Who's behind it

10 senators are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

45 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 55 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (45)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 6, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 6, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Nov 12, 2013

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 9, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 9, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 208.

  3. Apr 7, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jan 22, 2014

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Jan 21, 2014

    The Senate adopted it.

  6. Jan 21, 2014

    The Assembly passed it too.

  7. Jan 21, 2014

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Nov 25, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Nov 13, 2013

    The Assembly received it.

  10. Nov 12, 2013

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  11. Nov 12, 2013

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  12. Nov 12, 2013

    The Senate adopted it.

  13. Nov 11, 2013

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  14. Nov 11, 2013

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  15. Nov 6, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  16. Nov 6, 2013

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  17. Aug 29, 2013

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  18. Aug 20, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  19. Aug 12, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Jul 11, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  21. Jun 27, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor.

  22. Jun 27, 2013

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 27, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Grothman, Lehman, Lasee, Erpenbach, Hansen, Harris, C. Larson, Miller, Risser and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Bies, Sargent, Barca, Barnes, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Bewley, Billings, Clark, Danou, Doyle, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Hulsey, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kessler, Kolste, Mason, Milroy, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Pasch, Pope, Richards, Riemer, Ringhand, Sinicki, Smith, C. Taylor, Vruwink, Wachs, Wright, Young, Zamarripa, Zepnick, Bernier, Jagler and Shankland

  2. Jun 27, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Labor

  3. Jul 11, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 12, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Aug 20, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Aug 29, 2013 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor

  7. Oct 28, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman

  8. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Nov 6, 2013 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Nov 6, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Nov 6, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  14. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  15. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  16. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  17. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  19. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  20. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senator Vinehout added as a coauthor

  21. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Nov 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  23. Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  24. Jan 16, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-21-2014 by Committee on Rules

  25. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  26. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Bies

  27. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  28. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  30. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  31. Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Jan 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  33. Jan 21, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  34. Jan 22, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Senate Organization and take up

  35. Jan 22, 2014 · Senate

    Assembly Amendment 1 concurred in

  36. Jan 22, 2014 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  37. Feb 10, 2014 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  38. Apr 7, 2014 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-7-2014

  39. Apr 9, 2014 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 208

  40. Apr 9, 2014 · Senate

    Published 4-9-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote