Senate Bill 240
Knowledge tests for commercial driver license applicants who hold a military commercial driver license. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Dec 16, 2013. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jul 31, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Oct 8, 2013
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Oct 15, 2013
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 94
Latest entry in the official record, Dec 16, 2013: “Published 12-14-2013”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) generally must examine every applicant for an operator's license, including a commercial driver license (CDL), and the examination must include both a knowledge test and a driving skills test. DOT must promulgate rules setting testing standards consistent with federal law, including standards for CDL applicants. DOT's standards must require a knowledge test and driving skills test for persons making their first application for an operator's license. DOT may require persons changing their residence to this state from another jurisdiction to take all or parts of the examination required of persons making their first application for an operator's license.
Also under current law, if an applicant to DOT for a CDL holds a military CDL and submits the military CDL and certain other documentation to DOT, DOT must treat the application the same as an application submitted by a person holding a CDL from another jurisdiction.
Read the full summary Show less
Federal regulations generally require that a military CDL holder who applies for a state-issued CDL must pass a knowledge test before the CDL is issued.
This bill specifies that, if a military CDL holder applies to DOT for a CDL, DOT must require the applicant to take and pass applicable knowledge tests, unless the applicant is exempt from, or eligible for a waiver of, these knowledge tests under applicable federal regulations.
Who's behind it
5 senators are its . 3 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.
10 more lawmakers .
See all 15 names Hide the names
Authors (5)
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (10)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Penny Bernard Schaber · Democrat, Assembly
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Kooyenga · Republican, Senate
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Smith, Barca and Riemer
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Weatherston · Republican, Assembly
- Mandy Wright · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Aug 29, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Dec 16, 2013
The new law was published.
-
Dec 16, 2013
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 94.
-
Dec 12, 2013
Sent to the governor.
-
Oct 15, 2013
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Oct 10, 2013 to Oct 15, 2013
3 more representatives and 1 senator signed on in support.
-
Oct 10, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 9, 2013
The Assembly received it.
-
Oct 8, 2013
The Senate passed it.
-
Aug 29, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Aug 22, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Aug 21, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jul 31, 2013
Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs.
-
Jul 31, 2013
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jul 31, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Petrowski, Hansen, Olsen, Schultz and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Ripp, Bernard Schaber, Kooyenga, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Spiros, Weatherston and Wright
- Jul 31, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs
- Aug 21, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 22, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Aug 29, 2013 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Aug 29, 2013 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Aug 29, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 7, 2013 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-8-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 9, 2013 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Oct 10, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 10, 2013 · Assembly
Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor
- Oct 10, 2013 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-15-2013 by Committee on Rules
- Oct 15, 2013 · Assembly
- Oct 15, 2013 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 15, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 15, 2013 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 15, 2013 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Oct 15, 2013 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Oct 18, 2013 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Dec 12, 2013 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 12-12-2013
- Dec 16, 2013 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 12-13-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 94
- Dec 16, 2013 · Senate
Published 12-14-2013
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote