Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: authorizing a city or village to require the Department of Revenue to redetermine the value of the tax incremental base of certain tax incremental districts. (FE)
Municipality — Taxation Property tax Revenue, department of Village — Taxation
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a
TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several
steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the
proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local
planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed
project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID.
Generally under current law a local planning commission may amend the
project plan of a TID, by adding or subtracting territory from the district, not more
than four times during the TID's existence. If a TID's project plan is amended,
current law authorizes DOR to redetermine the TID's tax incremental base. DOR
may charge a city or village $1,000 to determine or redetermine a TID's tax
incremental base or, if a project plan amendment both adds and subtracts territory,
DOR may impose a fee of $2,000.
Under this bill, a city or village may adopt a resolution, subject to joint review
board approval, and not more than twice during a TID's life, requiring DOR to
redetermine the tax incremental base of a TID which is in a decrement situation that
has continued for at least two consecutive years. The bill defines decrement situation
as a situation in which the current aggregate equalized value of all the taxable
property within the TID is at least 10 percent less than the current value of the TID's
tax incremental base. DOR may charge the city of village $1,000 for the
redetermination.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Sep 25, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Oct 7, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Oct 7, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
Passed 32–0 Oct 8, 2013 official source full pageAye · 32
- Alberta Darling (8)
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dale Schultz (17)
- Dave Hansen (30)
- Frank G. Lasee (1)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Glenn Grothman (20)
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Jerry Petrowski (29)
- Joe Leibham (9)
- John Lehman (21)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Julie M. Lassa (24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (31)
- Leah Vukmir (5)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Mary Lazich (28)
- Michael Ellis (19)
- Neal Kedzie (11)
- Nikiya Harris Dodd (6)
- Paul F. Farrow (33)
- Richard Gudex (18)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (10)
- Terry Moulton (23)
- Thomas Tiffany (12)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
- Timothy Cullen (15)
Not voting · 1
- Robert Jauch (25)
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 7, Noes 2
Passed 7–2 Jan 30, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Jan 30, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Aug 16, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Gudex, L. Taylor, Grothman, Harris, T. Cullen, Olsen and Jauch; cosponsored by Representatives Schraa, Hintz, Spiros, Thiesfeldt, Weatherston, Brooks, Ripp, Stone, Kahl, Kolste, Mason, Wright, Jorgensen, Zepnick and Bies
- Aug 16, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue
- Sep 18, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Sep 18, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 25, 2013 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 25, 2013 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Sep 25, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 2, 2013 · Senate
Representative Ohnstad added as a cosponsor
- Oct 7, 2013 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-8-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 7, 2013 · Senate
Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 7, 2013 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 9, 2013 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Oct 22, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on State and Local Finance
- Oct 30, 2013 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 8, 2013 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Nass
- Nov 21, 2013 · Assembly
Senator Lassa added as a coauthor
- Jan 22, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Stroebel
- Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 7, Noes 2
- Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly
Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-20-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 21, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 21, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 7, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Assembly Amendment 2 concurred in
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 19, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 1, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-1-2014
- Apr 2, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 183
- Apr 2, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-3-2014