Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

SB 252

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: authorizing a city or village to require the Department of Revenue to redetermine the value of the tax incremental base of certain tax incremental districts. (FE)

Municipality — Taxation Property tax Revenue, department of Village — Taxation

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a

TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several

steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the

proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local

planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed

project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's

proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the

overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or

village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID.

Generally under current law a local planning commission may amend the

project plan of a TID, by adding or subtracting territory from the district, not more

than four times during the TID's existence. If a TID's project plan is amended,

current law authorizes DOR to redetermine the TID's tax incremental base. DOR

may charge a city or village $1,000 to determine or redetermine a TID's tax

incremental base or, if a project plan amendment both adds and subtracts territory,

DOR may impose a fee of $2,000.

Under this bill, a city or village may adopt a resolution, subject to joint review

board approval, and not more than twice during a TID's life, requiring DOR to

redetermine the tax incremental base of a TID which is in a decrement situation that

has continued for at least two consecutive years. The bill defines decrement situation

as a situation in which the current aggregate equalized value of all the taxable

property within the TID is at least 10 percent less than the current value of the TID's

tax incremental base. DOR may charge the city of village $1,000 for the

redetermination.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Grothman (R) , Gudex (R) , Harris (D) , Jauch (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Olsen (R) , T. Cullen (D)

17 cosponsors

Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Hintz (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kahl (D) , Kolste (D) , Lassa (D) , Mason (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Ripp (R) , Schraa (R) , Spiros (R) , Stone (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Weatherston (R) , Wright (D) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Sep 25, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 7, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 7, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 7, Noes 2

Passed 7–2 Jan 30, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Jan 30, 2014 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Aug 16, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Gudex, L. Taylor, Grothman, Harris, T. Cullen, Olsen and Jauch; cosponsored by Representatives Schraa, Hintz, Spiros, Thiesfeldt, Weatherston, Brooks, Ripp, Stone, Kahl, Kolste, Mason, Wright, Jorgensen, Zepnick and Bies

  2. Aug 16, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue

  3. Sep 18, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Sep 18, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Sep 25, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 25, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Sep 25, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Oct 2, 2013 · Senate

    Representative Ohnstad added as a cosponsor

  9. Oct 7, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-8-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Oct 7, 2013 · Senate

    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 7, 2013 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  16. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Oct 9, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Oct 22, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on State and Local Finance

  19. Oct 30, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  20. Nov 8, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Nass

  21. Nov 21, 2013 · Assembly

    Senator Lassa added as a coauthor

  22. Jan 22, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Stroebel

  23. Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  24. Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 7, Noes 2

  25. Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  26. Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  27. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2014 by Committee on Rules

  28. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  29. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  30. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  31. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  32. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  33. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  34. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  35. Feb 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  36. Feb 21, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  37. Mar 7, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  38. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Assembly Amendment 2 concurred in

  39. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  40. Mar 19, 2014 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  41. Apr 1, 2014 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-1-2014

  42. Apr 2, 2014 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 183

  43. Apr 2, 2014 · Senate

    Published 4-3-2014