Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 275

The role of the clerk of a circuit court in filing the oath and bond of a municipal judge; signatures on citations or complaints alleging a violation of a municipal ordinance; the fee for a transcript of an electronic recording of municipal court proceedings; and the authority of a municipal court judge to order a default judgment against a defendant who fails to appear at trial

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 16, 2013. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 29, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Oct 15, 2013

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2013

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 107

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 16, 2013: “Published 12-14-2013”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes several changes to municipal court practice and procedure.

Current law requires municipal judges to take and file an official oath and execute and file an official bond with the clerk of the city, town, or village where the judge was elected.

Read the full summary

This bill eliminates a provision that requires municipal judges to file the oath and bond with the clerk of the circuit court that the municipal judge serves. The bill also eliminates a requirement that the clerks of the circuit courts annually send a certified list of all municipal court judges who filed their official bonds with the clerks during the preceding year.

Under current law, a citation or complaint alleging a violation of a municipal ordinance must be signed by a law enforcement officer, an attorney representing the municipality, or, under certain circumstances, a conservation warden, municipal official, or municipal employee (signatory). This bill eliminates the requirement that the citation be signed and, instead, requires only that the name of the signatory appear in the citation or complaint.

Current law requires a defendant in municipal court to make an initial court appearance in person or in a written response to the citation or complaint. Current law permits a municipal court judge to order a default judgment against a defendant who fails to make an initial appearance or to make a deposit in the amount set for the violation. This bill permits a municipal court judge to order a default judgment against a defendant who fails to appear at trial.

Under current law, a person who appeals a municipal court judgment or decision (appellant) must pay for the cost of any transcript made of electronic recordings of the municipal court action. Current law also requires the appellant to pay a $10 fee for the preparation of the transcript. Finally, under certain circumstances, current law requires a defendant appellant who does not prevail on appeal or whose appeal is dismissed to pay for the cost of the transcript. This bill eliminates the requirement that the appellant pay a $10 transcript fee, and eliminates the duplicative requirement that a defendant appellant pay for the cost of the transcript if the appellant does not prevail on appeal.

Who's behind it

Glenn Grothman, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 10, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Oct 31, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 16, 2013

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 16, 2013

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 107.

  3. Dec 12, 2013

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 5, 2013

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Oct 31, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Oct 31, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  7. Oct 29, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Oct 22, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  9. Oct 16, 2013

    The Assembly received it.

  10. Oct 15, 2013

    The Senate passed it.

  11. Oct 10, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  12. Oct 1, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Aug 29, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor.

  14. Aug 29, 2013

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 29, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Grothman; cosponsored by Representative J. Ott

  2. Aug 29, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Labor

  3. Oct 1, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Oct 10, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  6. Oct 10, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Oct 14, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-15-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  8. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  9. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  11. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  12. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Oct 16, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  14. Oct 22, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary

  15. Oct 29, 2013 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  16. Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  17. Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  18. Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  19. Oct 31, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2013 by Committee on Rules

  20. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Nov 6, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Nov 8, 2013 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  27. Dec 12, 2013 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 12-12-2013

  28. Dec 16, 2013 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-13-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 107

  29. Dec 16, 2013 · Senate

    Published 12-14-2013

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote