Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: annual or consecutive month permits for vehicles or combinations of vehicles transporting loads near the Wisconsin-Michigan border. (FE)
Bus and truck — Taxation or registration Forestry Interstate relations Road Transportation projects commission Transportation, department of — Vehicles
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, with limited exceptions, no person may operate on a
highway any vehicle or combination of vehicles (vehicle) that exceeds certain
statutory limits on size, weight, or load unless that person possesses a permit issued
by the Department of Transportation (DOT), which may issue an annual or
consecutive month permit (Michigan border permit) for an oversize or overweight
vehicle to: 1) transport loads within 11 miles of the Wisconsin-Michigan state line;
2) transport exclusively peeled or unpeeled forest products cut crosswise, wood chips,
or forestry biomass on USH 2 in Iron County, Florence County, or Ashland County
or in Bayfield County from the Ashland County line through Hart Lake Road, if the
vehicle is traveling between this state and Michigan and does not violate Michigan
law; 3) transport exclusively peeled or unpeeled forest products cut crosswise, wood
chips, or forestry biomass on USH 2 from STH 13 in the city of Ashland through Hart
Lake Road in Bayfield County; and 4) transport raw forest products or lumber on
specified highway routes, including a portion of USH 8 in Oneida and Forest counties
and STH 139 from the Wisconsin-Michigan border to USH 8, if the vehicle does not
violate Michigan law. Current law defines "raw forest products" as logs, pilings,
posts, poles, cordwood products, wood chips, sawdust, pulpwood, intermediary
lumber, fuel wood and Christmas trees not altered by a manufacturing process off
the land, sawmill or factory from which they are taken.
This bill modifies operating authority for vehicles operating under a Michigan
border permit in a way that standardizes certain requirements with respect to
highway routes where a Michigan border permit is used. Under the bill, if a vehicle
is operating on a route under items 2 to 4, above, the Michigan border permit
authorizes the transportation of raw forest products, lumber, and forestry biomass.
The bill also eliminates the requirement under item 2, above, that the vehicle travel
between this state and Michigan. The bill adds an additional requirement for items
1 and 3, above, that the vehicle being operated not violate Michigan law. The bill
allows a vehicle operating under a Michigan border permit as provided in item 4,
above, to operate on additional segments of USH 8. The bill also specifies that a
vehicle operated under a Michigan border permit on any route under items 1 to 4,
above, may operate unladen on any of these routes when returning from the delivery
of a load or when traveling to or from a point of fueling, servicing, or purchase or sale
of the vehicle.
Under current law, if any bill introduced in either house of the legislature
directly or indirectly establishes an exception to vehicle weight limitations, DOT
must prepare a report, containing specified information, relating to the bill within
six weeks after the bill is introduced and before any vote is taken on the bill. This
bill directs DOT not to prepare such a report on this bill.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Sep 26, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Sep 26, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 3, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Petrowski, Tiffany, Grothman and Jauch; cosponsored by Representatives Mursau, Swearingen, Czaja, T. Larson, Murtha, Nygren, Spiros and Tittl
- Sep 3, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs
- Sep 5, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Sep 6, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski
- Sep 26, 2013 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 26, 2013 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Sep 26, 2013 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Sep 26, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2014 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1