Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 290

Mortgage satisfaction and an exception to the real estate transfer fee. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 12, 2013. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 10, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 32 to 1

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 14, 2013

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 66

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 12, 2013: “Published 12-13-2013”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the holder of any type of mortgage is required to record a satisfaction of mortgage within 30 days after the mortgagor completes full performance of the conditions of the mortgage. However, if the mortgage is fully performed and the mortgage holder receives by certified mail a written request from the mortgagor for a full satisfaction, the mortgage holder must record a satisfaction of mortgage within seven days or is liable to the mortgagor for actual damages plus penalty damages of $100 for each day that the violation remains uncorrected, up to $2,000 in penalty damages. This bill repeals those provisions and replaces them with mortgage satisfaction provisions that are similar to the Uniform Residential Mortgage Satisfaction Act (URMSA), except that, with the exception of affidavits of satisfaction, the new provisions apply to all mortgages, not just mortgages on residential property.

Under the bill, a creditor who has a security interest in real property must record a satisfaction of the security instrument (mortgage) within 30 days after the secured creditor receives full payment of the secured obligation or payment as provided in a payoff statement provided by the creditor to the landowner or other person authorized to request a payoff statement. If the creditor does not do so within the required time, the creditor is liable to the landowner for $500, plus any actual damages and reasonable attorney fees and court costs, but no punitive damages.

Read the full summary

The bill provides another mortgage satisfaction option for mortgages on residential real property: recording an affidavit of satisfaction of a security instrument. Under this option, upon or at any time after full performance or payment as provided in a payoff statement by the residential property owner, a satisfaction agent authorized by the owner may give the secured creditor notice that the satisfaction agent may record an affidavit of satisfaction of the security instrument. Under the bill, only a title insurance company acting directly or through an authorized agent may act as a satisfaction agent. The bill specifies the information that must be contained in the notice that is sent to the secured creditor, such as that the satisfaction agent has reasonable grounds to believe that the property is residential real property and that the secured creditor has received full payment or payment as provided in a payoff statement. After providing the notice, the satisfaction agent may submit the affidavit of satisfaction to the register of deeds for recording if the secured creditor authorizes the satisfaction agent to do so or if the secured creditor does not, within 30 days after receiving the notice, record a satisfaction. The satisfaction agent may not record the affidavit of satisfaction, however, if the agent receives notice from the secured creditor that the security instrument has been assigned, in which case the satisfaction agent must provide the notice to record an affidavit of satisfaction to the assignee, or that the secured obligation has not been satisfied, unless the satisfaction agent has reasonable grounds to believe that a person paid an understated payoff amount on which the person reasonably and detrimentally relied. An affidavit of satisfaction that complies with the requirements in the bill is entitled to be recorded in the office of the register of deeds, and a recorded affidavit of satisfaction constitutes a satisfaction of the security instrument described in the affidavit. The bill contains penalties against a satisfaction agent who records an affidavit of satisfaction erroneously or with knowledge that the statements in the affidavit are false, and authorizes a satisfaction agent to charge fees for providing the notice and preparing and executing the affidavit.

The bill sets out the right of a settlement agent or a person who is obligated under a security instrument to request a payoff statement from the secured creditor.

The person or settlement agent, or his or her authorized agent, may give notice to the secured creditor requesting a payoff statement for a specified payoff date that is not more than 30 days from the date the notice is given. The secured creditor must issue a payoff statement within seven business days after the effective date of a notice that contains the information specified in the bill, or within a reasonable longer time if the property that is subject to the security interest is not residential property, and may not charge the person for the first payoff statement the person requests in any two-month period. The bill specifies the information that the payoff statement must contain, and provides for penalties against a secured creditor for not sending a timely payoff statement that substantially complies with the content requirements in the bill. If the payoff amount in a payoff statement is understated, the secured creditor may send a corrected payoff statement, but the secured creditor is prohibited from denying the accuracy of the payoff amount as against any person who reasonably and detrimentally relies on the understated amount. If the secured creditor receives payment as provided in an understated payoff statement, the secured creditor must still record a satisfaction of the mortgage within 30 days but may recover from the obligated party any amount that was incorrectly not included in the payoff statement.

In addition to the security instrument satisfaction provisions, the bill specifies acceptable methods for and the effective dates of providing notice under the bill. The bill also provides for the recording of a document of rescission, which rescinds an erroneously recorded satisfaction or affidavit of satisfaction, keeping the security instrument in force.

Under current law, a real estate transfer fee must be paid when an ownership interest in real property is transferred. Current law contains various exceptions to the payment of the real estate transfer fee, however, including when real property valued at or under $100 is transferred. The bill changes this real property value amount for the exception to $1,000 or less.

Because this bill relates to an exemption from state or local taxes, it may be referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions for a report to be printed as an appendix to the bill.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Republican.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 9, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 4, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 4, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from Joint Committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by Committee on Senate Organization, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 1 · Nov 5, 2013

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 12, 2013

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 12, 2013

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 66.

  3. Dec 10, 2013

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 14, 2013

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Nov 12, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Nov 5, 2013

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Nov 5, 2013

    The Senate passed it, 32 to 1.

  8. Nov 4, 2013

    “Withdrawn from Joint Committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by Committee on Senate Organization, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  9. Nov 4, 2013

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  10. Oct 9, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. Sep 26, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Sep 23, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Sep 18, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Sep 10, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues.

  15. Sep 10, 2013

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 10, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Harsdorf and Shilling; cosponsored by Representatives Stroebel, Bernier, Nygren, A. Ott, Kooyenga, Doyle, Jacque and Thiesfeldt

  2. Sep 10, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues

  3. Sep 18, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 23, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Sep 26, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Nov 4, 2013 · Senate

    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Nov 4, 2013 · Senate

    Withdrawn from Joint Committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by Committee on Senate Organization, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Nov 4, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1

  16. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-14-2013 by Committee on Rules

  20. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Nov 15, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Dec 4, 2013 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  27. Dec 10, 2013 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 12-10-2013

  28. Dec 12, 2013 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-12-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 66

  29. Dec 12, 2013 · Senate

    Published 12-13-2013

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote