Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: race-based nicknames, logos, mascots, and team names and making an appropriation. (FE)
Discrimination in education Hearings and appeals, division of Indians and tribal issues School — Board School — Health program School — State aid State superintendent of public instruction
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a school district resident may object to a school board's use
of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name by filing a complaint with the
state superintendent of public instruction (state superintendent). If a complaint is
received, the state superintendent must hold a hearing on the complaint, at which
the school board has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the
use of the race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name does not promote
discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping. However, the state
superintendent does not have to hold a hearing if a school board demonstrates that
the use of a nickname, logo, mascot, or team name relates to a specific federally
recognized American Indian tribe and the specific tribe has approved the school
board's use of the nickname, logo, mascot, or team name.
Currently, if the state superintendent finds that the use of the race-based
nickname, logo, mascot, or team name promotes discrimination, pupil harassment,
or stereotyping, the state superintendent must order the school board to terminate
its use of the nickname, logo, mascot, or team name within 12 months after issuance
of the order. However, the state superintendent may extend the amount of time a
school board has to comply with an order to terminate the use of a nickname, logo,
mascot, or team name under certain circumstances. A school board that uses a
race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name in violation of an order is subject
to a forfeiture of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000 for each day that it violates
the order.
This bill makes various changes to the complaint process for objecting to a
school board's use of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name. First,
under the bill, a complaint to object to the use of a race-based nickname, logo,
mascot, or team name must include the signatures of at least the number of school
district residents that is equal to ten percent of the school district's membership and
the signatures must be obtained within the 120-day period before the complaint is
filed. Second, the bill requires the division of hearings and appeals, rather than the
state superintendent, to hold a hearing on a complaint objecting to the use of a
race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name. Third, the bill reverses the
burden of proof at a hearing challenging the use of a race-based nickname, logo,
mascot, or team name so that the burden is on the school district resident to
demonstrate that the nickname, logo, mascot, or team name promotes
discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping. Fourth, the bill allows the state
superintendent to forego a hearing if a school board demonstrates that a federally
recognized American Indian tribe that has historical ties to this state has, under an
agreement with the school board, approved the school board's use. Fifth, the bill
prohibits the state superintendent from promulgating a rule that creates a
presumption of what constitutes a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name
that promotes discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping. Sixth, the bill
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 4, Noes 3
Passed 4–3 Oct 14, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Oct 14, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Oct 14, 2013 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 2, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lazich, Kedzie, Farrow, Ellis, Olsen and Grothman; cosponsored by Representatives Nass, Craig, Kaufert, Jacque, Tittl, Kramer, Knodl, Ballweg, Sanfelippo, Petersen, Loudenbeck, August, Pridemore, Weatherston, Kuglitsch, Ripp, Schraa, Stroebel, Murphy and LeMahieu
- Oct 2, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications
- Oct 9, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-15-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Shilling
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 14, 2013 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senators Shilling, Lehman, Miller, T. Cullen, C. Larson, Lassa, Hansen, Jauch, Carpenter, L. Taylor, Vinehout and Harris
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Schultz and Miller
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Placed on the foot of the 11th order of business on the calendar of 10-15-2013
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senators Schultz and Miller
- Oct 15, 2013 · Senate
Placed on the foot of the 12th order of business on the calendar of 10-15-2013
- Nov 5, 2013 · Senate
Laid on table
- Apr 8, 2014 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1