Senate Bill 325
Controlled substances, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 24, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 2, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Nov 5, 2013
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jan 21, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 351
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 24, 2014: “Published 4-24-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, controlled substances are classified in one of five separate schedules. The classification is based on: 1) whether there is a currently accepted medical use for the drug; 2) the drug's potential for being abused; and 3) the nature of the psychological or physical dependence that the drug use may produce.
Schedule I controlled substances are those that have a high potential for abuse and no currently accepted medical use. Schedule V controlled substances are those that have an accepted medical use and that have a lower potential for abuse and produce less dependence when compared with other controlled substances.
Read the full summary Show less
Penalties for crimes relating to Schedule I controlled substances are generally the most severe, and for Schedule V controlled substances are generally the least severe.
Under current law, eight synthetic cannabinoids and two stimulant substances commonly known as "bath salts" are classified as Schedule I controlled substances.
Current law also penalizes the possession, manufacture, delivery, or distribution of the analogs of these substances. Current law defines a controlled substance analog as a substance that has a chemical structure substantially similar to the chemical structure of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II, and that has a similar effect on the user of the substance as the controlled substance.
Current law also penalizes the manufacture, distribution, or delivery of Salvinorin A, a psychotropic ingredient in the plant Salvia divinorum, but does not classify that substance as a controlled substance.
Under this bill, the concept of an analog of a synthetic cannabinoid or of a bath salt stimulant is replaced with a description of the chemical structure of the prohibited or restricted substance. The bill controls synthetic cannabinoids, certain other designer drugs, and certain substances known as bath salts as part of distinct structural classes. Under the bill, any substance, listed or not, that conforms to the structural definition is controlled by the particular structural class. The bill adds several new hallucinogenic and stimulant substances to Schedule I, and includes Salvinorin A in the list of Schedule I controlled substances.
The bill also adds several new Schedule II, III, IV, and V controlled substances by including in those schedules a description of the chemical structure of those substances.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.
Who's behind it
5 senators are its . 3 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.
22 more lawmakers .
See all 27 names Hide the names
Authors (5)
- Richard Gudex · Republican, Senate
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- Robert Jauch · Democrat, Senate
- Neal Kedzie · Republican, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (22)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Penny Bernard Schaber · Democrat, Assembly
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Janet Bewley · Democrat, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Czaja · Republican, Assembly
- Evan Goyke · Democrat, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Dean Knudson · Republican, Assembly
- Debra Kolste · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Janis Ringhand · Democrat, Senate
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Larson · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Dana Wachs · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 25, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 24, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 24, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 351.
-
Apr 22, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 21, 2014
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jan 21, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Nov 25, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Nov 5, 2013
The Assembly received it.
-
Nov 5, 2013
The Senate passed it.
-
Nov 5, 2013
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Oct 25, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Oct 21, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 18, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 10, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 9, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 2, 2013
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor.
-
Oct 2, 2013
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 2, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Jauch, Kedzie, Gudex and Lassa; cosponsored by Representatives Bies, Bewley, Milroy, Ballweg, Berceau, Bernier, Brooks, Czaja, Goyke, Jacque, Knudson, Kolste, T. Larson, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Ringhand, Spiros, Tittl, Wachs and Bernard Schaber
- Oct 2, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Labor
- Oct 9, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 10, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 18, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 21, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 24, 2013 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 25, 2013 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 25, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 4, 2013 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-5-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Nov 5, 2013 · Senate
Senator Miller added as a coauthor
- Nov 5, 2013 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 5, 2013 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2013 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 5, 2013 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 5, 2013 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 16, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-21-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Representative Vruwink added as a cosponsor
- Jan 21, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 21, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 10, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 22, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014
- Apr 24, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 351
- Apr 24, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-24-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote