Skip to content

Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session

SB 328

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: changing the method by which a municipality may collect the costs of razing a building from a property owner. (FE)

Building County — Finance County — Human services Lien Municipality — Finance Property tax — Assessment

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a municipality's governing body, building inspector, or other

designated official may issue an order to raze a dilapidated, dangerous, or

unsanitary building that is unreasonable to repair. The order is issued to the

building's owner and, if the owner does not comply with the order within the

prescribed time, the municipality may proceed to raze the building. The cost of

razing may be charged in full or in part against the real estate upon which the

building is located, in which case that cost becomes a lien upon the real estate and

may be assessed and collected as a special tax.

Under current law, if the cost or razing is assessed as a special tax and the owner

of the real estate does not pay the amount due, the municipality's costs to raze the

building must be paid by the county as part of the August settlement of property

taxes. Under this bill, the cost of razing may be assessed and collected as a special

charge, but may not be assessed and collected as a special tax. Under the bill, a

county would not be required to pay a municipality's razing costs if the owner of real

estate does not pay the special charge, even though a delinquent special charge

becomes a lien on the property against which it is imposed.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Cowles (R) , Leibham (R) , Olsen (R) , Schultz (R) , T. Cullen (D) , Wirch (D)

18 cosponsors

Bernier (R) , Bewley (D) , Brooks (R) , Doyle (D) , Kahl (D) , Kooyenga (R) , Krug (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Marklein (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Nygren (R) , Petersen (R) , Smith (D) , Strachota (R) , Tittl (R) , Tranel (R) , Weatherston (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 29, 2013 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 2, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Olsen, Cowles, Leibham, Wirch, Schultz and T. Cullen; cosponsored by Representatives Nygren, Kahl, Kooyenga, Krug, Mursau, Tittl, Tranel, Strachota, Murphy, Petersen, LeMahieu, Brooks, Smith, Bernier, Weatherston, Marklein, Doyle and Bewley

  2. Oct 2, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development and Local Government

  3. Oct 17, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 23, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 29, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 29, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Oct 29, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Apr 8, 2014 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1