Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 334

Technical excellence higher education scholarships, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 10, 2013. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 4, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2013

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 92 to 3

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 60

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 10, 2013: “Published 12-11-2013”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Higher Educational Aids Board (HEAB) administers the Academic Excellence Higher Education Scholarship Program under which HEAB awards scholarships to certain scholars, designated on the basis of grade point average, who enroll, on a full-time basis, in a public or private institution of higher education in this state. Under the program, a higher education scholarship recipient who enrolls in a technical college district school is exempt from all tuition and fees, up to $2,250 per academic year, for each year, up to three years, that the recipient is enrolled full time, maintains at least a 3.000 grade point average, and makes satisfactory progress toward an associate or a bachelor's degree or a vocational diploma. Under that program, HEAB pays the institution of higher education attended by a scholar up to $1,125 per academic year and the institution must match the amount paid to the institution by HEAB.

Currently, those scholarships may be awarded: 1) to the senior with the highest grade point average from each high school in this state enrolling at least 80 but fewer than 500 pupils; 2) to the two seniors with the two highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 500 but fewer than 1,000 pupils; 3) to the three seniors with the three highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,000 but fewer than 1,500 pupils; 4) to the four seniors with the four highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,500 but fewer than 2,000 pupils; 5) to the five seniors with the five highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 2,000 but fewer than 2,500 pupils; and 6) to the six seniors with the six highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling 2,500 or more pupils. In addition, those scholarships may be awarded to the senior with the highest grade point average from the school operated by the Wisconsin Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the school operated by the Wisconsin Educational Services Program for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing and not more than ten scholarships statewide may be awarded to seniors with the highest grade point averages from high schools enrolling fewer than 80 pupils.

Read the full summary

This bill creates a Technical Excellence Higher Education Scholarship Program under which HEAB awards scholarships to certain scholars, designated on the basis of level of proficiency in technical education subjects, who enroll, on a full-time basis, in a technical college district school. Under the Technical Excellence Higher Education Scholarship Program, the number and amounts of scholarships awarded, the duration for which a scholarship may be awarded, the conditions for continued receipt of a scholarship, and the institutional match requirement are the same as under the Academic Excellence Higher Education Scholarship Program.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 3 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.

22 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 27 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (22)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 7 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 15, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 16 to 0 · Oct 16, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 16 to 0 · Oct 16, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 92 to 3 · Nov 5, 2013 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (92)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 92, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 56 to 39 · Nov 5, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 39”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Nov 5, 2013

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 10, 2013

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 10, 2013

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 60.

  3. Dec 9, 2013

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 5, 2013

    The Assembly passed it too, 92 to 3.

  5. Nov 5, 2013

    “Read first time and referred to calendar of 11-5-2013” (the official wording)

  6. Nov 5, 2013

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Nov 5, 2013

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  8. Nov 5, 2013

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Nov 1, 2013 to Nov 5, 2013

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  10. Oct 16, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 16 to 0.

  11. Oct 15, 2013

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  12. Oct 11, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Oct 11, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  14. Oct 11, 2013

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  15. Oct 10, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Oct 9, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Oct 4, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government.

  18. Oct 4, 2013

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 4, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Gudex, Darling, L. Taylor, Lehman and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Krug, Ballweg, Stone, Petryk, Marklein, Wright, Kestell, Nygren, Kleefisch, T. Larson, Bies, C. Taylor, Weatherston, Tranel, Pridemore, Bernier, Endsley, LeMahieu and Murphy

  2. Oct 4, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development and Local Government

  3. Oct 9, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 10, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a coauthor

  6. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 15, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  12. Oct 16, 2013 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  13. Oct 16, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  14. Oct 16, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  15. Nov 1, 2013 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor

  16. Nov 4, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  17. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Senator Hansen added as a coauthor

  18. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  19. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  20. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  22. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  23. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  25. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to calendar of 11-5-2013

  27. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  28. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives C. Taylor, Mason, Kessler, Berceau, Hesselbein, Pasch, Clark, Sinicki, Zepnick, Ringhand, Kolste, Bernard Schaber, Shankland, Billings, Johnson, Ohnstad, Goyke, Pope and Hebl

  29. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 39

  30. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  32. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 92, Noes 3

  33. Nov 5, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Nov 6, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  35. Nov 8, 2013 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  36. Dec 9, 2013 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 12-9-2013

  37. Dec 10, 2013 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-10-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 60

  38. Dec 10, 2013 · Senate

    Published 12-11-2013

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote