Senate Bill 338
Expanding the authority of towns to create tax incremental financing districts. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 4, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 8, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Nov 12, 2013
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 20, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 193
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 4, 2014: “Published 4-5-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID.
Read the full summary Show less
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.
Under the current law limitations on towns to use tax incremental financing (TIF), a town may create a TID for projects related to tourism, agriculture, manufacturing, or forestry. A town may also use TIF for residential projects, but only to the extent that the residential project has a necessary and incidental relationship to a tourism, agricultural, manufacturing, or forestry project, and for retail projects to the extent that the retail development is related to the retail sale of a product that is produced due to an agricultural, forestry, or manufacturing project.
A town may also create a TID in limited circumstances under which the town enters into a cooperative plan with a city or village under which part or all of the town will be annexed or attached by the city or village.
This bill authorizes certain towns to exercise all of the powers of a city or village to create a TID within the town. To create a TID under the bill, a town must have a population of at least 5,000 and the equalized value of all taxable property within the town must be at least $500 million in the year before the year in which the town proposes to create the TID.
Who's behind it
Jerry Petrowski, a Republican, is its .
4 more lawmakers .
See all 5 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (4)
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Samantha Kerkman · Republican, Assembly
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- Stephen Smith · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 9 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 11, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 11, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 11, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 1 · Oct 11, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 18, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 8 to 1 · Feb 18, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance vote to recommend it
Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 18, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 4, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 4, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 193.
-
Apr 3, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 20, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 18, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 12, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 11, 2014
The Senate adopted it.
-
Mar 11, 2014
“Placed on the foot of the 12th order of business on the calendar of 3-11-2014” (the official wording)
-
Feb 21, 2014
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 20, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 20, 2014
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 20, 2014
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Feb 18, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 18, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 3.
-
Jan 23, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 25, 2013
Sent to the Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance.
-
Nov 13, 2013
The Assembly received it.
-
Nov 12, 2013
The Senate passed it.
-
Nov 12, 2013
The Senate adopted it.
-
Nov 11, 2013
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Nov 11, 2013
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Oct 16, 2013
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Oct 11, 2013
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.
-
Oct 11, 2013
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 11, 2013
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 11, 2013
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 10, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 10, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 8, 2013
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government.
-
Oct 8, 2013
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Petrowski; cosponsored by Representatives Brooks and Kerkman
- Oct 8, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development and Local Government
- Oct 10, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski
- Oct 10, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Petrowski
- Oct 10, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 10, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 10, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senator Petrowski
- Oct 11, 2013 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 11, 2013 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 11, 2013 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 11, 2013 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 11, 2013 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Oct 11, 2013 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 16, 2013 · Senate
Representative Schraa added as a cosponsor
- Nov 11, 2013 · Senate
Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Nov 11, 2013 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Nov 11, 2013 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Senate Amendment 3 adopted
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 12, 2013 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 13, 2013 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on State and Local Finance
- Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 31, 2014 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Stroebel
- Feb 17, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Stroebel
- Feb 17, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Steineke
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 6, Noes 3
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 1
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 6, Noes 3
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to Committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-20-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Representative Smith added as a cosponsor
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Kerkman
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 adopted
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 adopted
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 21, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly Amendment 2, Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3, and Assembly Amendment 3 adopted
- Feb 21, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 7, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Senator S. Fitzgerald
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Placed on the foot of the 12th order of business on the calendar of 3-11-2014
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Senator Petrowski
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Assembly Amendment 2 concurred in as amended
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 withdrawn and returned to author
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Assembly Amendment 3 concurred in
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 2 adopted; Assembly Amendment 3 concurred in)
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 10:30 AM on 3-20-2014 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 2 concurred in
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 21, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Apr 3, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 3, 2014 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Amendment 3)
- Apr 3, 2014 · Senate
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 3)
- Apr 3, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-3-2014
- Apr 4, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-4-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 193
- Apr 4, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-5-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote