Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 338

Expanding the authority of towns to create tax incremental financing districts. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 4, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 8, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 12, 2013

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 20, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 193

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 4, 2014: “Published 4-5-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID.

Read the full summary

The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.

Under the current law limitations on towns to use tax incremental financing (TIF), a town may create a TID for projects related to tourism, agriculture, manufacturing, or forestry. A town may also use TIF for residential projects, but only to the extent that the residential project has a necessary and incidental relationship to a tourism, agricultural, manufacturing, or forestry project, and for retail projects to the extent that the retail development is related to the retail sale of a product that is produced due to an agricultural, forestry, or manufacturing project.

A town may also create a TID in limited circumstances under which the town enters into a cooperative plan with a city or village under which part or all of the town will be annexed or attached by the city or village.

This bill authorizes certain towns to exercise all of the powers of a city or village to create a TID within the town. To create a TID under the bill, a town must have a population of at least 5,000 and the equalized value of all taxable property within the town must be at least $500 million in the year before the year in which the town proposes to create the TID.

Who's behind it

Jerry Petrowski, a Republican, is its ⁠.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 5 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 9 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Oct 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 18, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 1 · Feb 18, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 18, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 4, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 4, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 193.

  3. Apr 3, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 20, 2014

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Mar 18, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 12, 2014

    The Assembly passed it too.

  7. Mar 11, 2014

    The Senate adopted it.

  8. Mar 11, 2014

    “Placed on the foot of the 12th order of business on the calendar of 3-11-2014” (the official wording)

  9. Feb 21, 2014

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Feb 20, 2014

    The Assembly passed it too.

  11. Feb 20, 2014

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Feb 20, 2014

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  13. Feb 18, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  14. Feb 18, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 3.

  15. Jan 23, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Nov 25, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on State and Local Finance.

  17. Nov 13, 2013

    The Assembly received it.

  18. Nov 12, 2013

    The Senate passed it.

  19. Nov 12, 2013

    The Senate adopted it.

  20. Nov 11, 2013

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  21. Nov 11, 2013

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  22. Oct 16, 2013

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  23. Oct 11, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  24. Oct 11, 2013

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  25. Oct 11, 2013

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  26. Oct 11, 2013

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  27. Oct 10, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  28. Oct 10, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  29. Oct 8, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development and Local Government.

  30. Oct 8, 2013

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Petrowski; cosponsored by Representatives Brooks and Kerkman

  2. Oct 8, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development and Local Government

  3. Oct 10, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski

  4. Oct 10, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Petrowski

  5. Oct 10, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 10, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Oct 10, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senator Petrowski

  8. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Local Government, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  13. Oct 11, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  14. Oct 16, 2013 · Senate

    Representative Schraa added as a cosponsor

  15. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  16. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  17. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  18. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  19. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  20. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  21. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 3 adopted

  22. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  24. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  25. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Nov 13, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  27. Nov 25, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on State and Local Finance

  28. Jan 23, 2014 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  29. Jan 31, 2014 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  30. Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Stroebel

  31. Feb 17, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Stroebel

  32. Feb 17, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Steineke

  33. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  34. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  35. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  36. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on State and Local Finance, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  37. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to Committee on Rules

  38. Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2014 by Committee on Rules

  39. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Representative Smith added as a cosponsor

  40. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  41. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  42. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Kerkman

  43. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 adopted

  44. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 adopted

  45. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  46. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  47. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  48. Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  49. Feb 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly Amendment 2, Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3, and Assembly Amendment 3 adopted

  50. Feb 21, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  51. Mar 7, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  52. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Senator S. Fitzgerald

  53. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on the foot of the 12th order of business on the calendar of 3-11-2014

  54. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Senator Petrowski

  55. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  56. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Assembly Amendment 2 concurred in as amended

  57. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 withdrawn and returned to author

  58. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Assembly Amendment 3 concurred in

  59. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  60. Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 2 adopted; Assembly Amendment 3 concurred in)

  61. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  62. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 10:30 AM on 3-20-2014 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28

  63. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 2 concurred in

  64. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  65. Mar 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  66. Apr 3, 2014 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  67. Apr 3, 2014 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 3)

  68. Apr 3, 2014 · Senate

    LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 3)

  69. Apr 3, 2014 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-3-2014

  70. Apr 4, 2014 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-4-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 193

  71. Apr 4, 2014 · Senate

    Published 4-5-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote