Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 384

The laws of trusts, the Uniform Trust Code, the Uniform Principal and Income Act, powers of appointment, and changes to estate recovery and divestment provisions relating to public assistance programs. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 16, 2013. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 4, 2013

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 12, 2013

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 14, 2013

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 92

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 16, 2013: “Published 12-14-2013”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

The Wisconsin Trust Code This bill replaces current law related to trusts with the Wisconsin Trust Code (Code), a modified version of the Uniform Trust Code, as amended in 2005 (UTC).

The Code is primarily a set of basic default rules that applies to certain trusts in this state. With some exceptions, the terms of a trust may override or modify the Code's default rules. There are, however, some mandatory provisions in the Code that may not be overridden or modified by the terms of a trust, including the requirements for creating a trust, the duty of a trustee to act in good faith, the effect of a spendthrift provision, limits on provisions that limit a trustee's liability, periods of limitation for commencing a judicial proceeding related to a trust, and the power of the court to take certain actions. The Code also includes default rules that are not included in the UTC, including rules related to a trustee's power to appoint assets to another trust, trust protectors, directed trusts, and life insurance contracts owned by trusts.

Read the full summary

In addition to creating the Code, the bill clarifies the definitions of "general power of appointment" and "special power of appointment" and clarifies when a creditor can reach assets that are subject to a power of appointment. The bill also extends the prudent investor rule to directing parties and trust protectors who have a power over the investment of a trust, and clarifies rules relating to a trustee's retention of securities received by a trustee. A further explanation of these changes is provided after the overview of the Code.

Under this bill, the 11 articles of the UTC are created as subchapters of the Code. Two differences in the structure of the UTC and the Code are: 1) the Uniform Prudent Investor Act, as adopted in this state, is referenced in the Code but otherwise remains outside the Code; and 2) the Uniform Principal and Income Act, which was previously adopted in this state, is included as subchapter 11 of the Code, moving the miscellaneous provisions of the Code to subchapter 12.

The following is an overview of each subchapter of the Code:

Subchapter 1: General Provisions and Definitions Subchapter 1 provides definitions for terms that are used throughout the Code, including a number of new terms and definitions. The new terms introduced in subchapter 1 include "qualified beneficiary," "directed trust property," and "trust protector." Under the Code, a "qualified beneficiary" is a person who is a current beneficiary of trust income or principal, a person who would be eligible to receive trust income or principal if the current beneficiaries' interests in the trust terminate, or a person who would receive a distribution if the trust terminates. "Directed trust property" is defined as property that is invested or managed by a directing party and for which the trustee has no investment or management responsibility. A "trust protector" is defined as a person who is given a specified power over the trust in a capacity other than as a trustee or a directing party. The terms "directed trust property," "directing party," and "trust protector" are not included in the UTC.

In addition to providing definitions for the Code, subchapter 1 exempts certain types of trusts from the Code, lists the provisions of the Code that may not be overridden by the terms of a trust, incorporates the common law of trusts into the Code, provides procedures for determining and transferring the principal place of administration for a trust, and provides methods for giving and waiving notice. This subchapter also provides that interested persons may enter into a nonjudicial settlement agreement to address issues related to a trust to the extent that a court could approve the terms of the nonjudicial settlement agreement.

Subchapter 2: Judicial Proceedings Subchapter 2 addresses the role of the court in administering a trust. Under current law, a testamentary trust is subject to continuing court supervision. Under the Code, a court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent that its jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person or as otherwise provided by law.

However, under the Code, a trust is not subject to continuing judicial supervision unless ordered by the court in response to a petition requesting the supervision. This subchapter also addresses procedural issues such as personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and venue for judicial proceedings related to trusts.

Subchapter 3: Representation Subchapter 3 allows a person to be represented and bound by another person for certain purposes. Under the Code, providing notice, information, accountings, or reports to a person who has the power to represent and bind another person has the same effect as providing the notice, information, accountings, or reports to the represented person. A person may be represented by a fiduciary, a parent, or by a representative chosen by the trustee or a court. A trustee is not required to provide information to a beneficiary if the trustee provides the information to the beneficiary's representative. This subchapter also specifically allows a minor, incapacitated person, unborn individual, or person whose identity is not known, to be represented and legally bound by a person who has a substantially identical interest with respect to the particular question or dispute to the extent there is no conflict of interest in that representation.

Subchapter 4: Creation, Validity, Modification, and Termination of Trust Subchapter 4 establishes the requirements for creating, modifying, and terminating a trust. Generally, the Code provides that a trust is created when a person transfers property to a trustee with the intent to create a trust relationship.

This subchapter expands upon the common law by specifically validating trusts for animals and trusts for certain noncharitable purposes. This subchapter also recognizes oral trusts if the terms of the trust are established by clear and convincing evidence.

This subchapter provides default rules for when a trust may be modified or terminated. For example, under the Code, a noncharitable irrevocable trust may be modified or terminated without court approval with the consent of the settlor and all of the beneficiaries, even if the modification or termination is inconsistent with a material purpose of the trust. Additionally, for purposes of terminating a trust, the Code increases the value of what qualifies as an uneconomic trust to a trust with a value of less than $100,000, as adjusted for inflation. Upon providing notice to the qualified beneficiaries, every trust protector, every directing party, and the settlor, if living, the trustee of an uneconomic trust may terminate the trust without court approval.

Under this subchapter, a court is directed to apply liberally the doctrine of cy pres to a charitable trust if the charitable purpose identified in the trust becomes unlawful, impracticable, impossible, or wasteful. Under the doctrine of cy pres, a court may substitute an alternative charitable purpose for a purpose that is unlawful, impracticable, impossible, or wasteful. The Code preserves the requirement under current law that, when applying the doctrine of cy pres, a court must consider the community needs and charitable interest of the settlor in determining an alternative plan for disposition of the trust property.

Finally, this subchapter includes a concept not addressed in the UTC, which is the authority of a trustee of an irrevocable trust to appoint trust assets to the trustee of another trust (a second trust) under certain circumstances. This procedure is commonly referred to as decanting. Under the Code, subject to certain requirements, a trustee who has the power to invade trust principal for the benefit of an income beneficiary may appoint trust property to a second trust provided that the appointment does not reduce any fixed income, annuity, or unitrust interest of the beneficiary. If a trustee's power to invade trust income or principal under the first trust is limited by a standard, the second trust may not grant the trustee a broader power to invade trust income or principal. Also, if the trustee's power to invade the principal of the first trust is not limited by a standard, the beneficiaries of the second trust do not have to include all of the beneficiaries of the first trust; otherwise, the beneficiaries of both trusts must be the same. A trustee may appoint assets to a second trust with or without court approval by providing notice to the qualified beneficiaries, every trust protector, every directing party, and the settlor, if living.

Subchapter 5: Creditor's Claim; Spendthrift and Discretionary Trusts Subchapter 5 addresses the validity of a spendthrift provision and the rights of a creditor of a settlor or a beneficiary to reach trust assets. The Code defines a "spendthrift provision" as a provision that restrains either or both the voluntary or involuntary transfer of a beneficiary's interest in a trust. In general, the Code preserves current law related to spendthrift provisions and creditors' rights, including exceptions for claims for child support and public support. The Code also preserves current law that allows a trustee to limit the claims of a creditor of a settlor upon the settlor's death by providing or publishing notice to the creditors. Thus, the Code's treatment of spendthrift provisions and creditor's rights differs from the UTC.

Under the Code, a creditor may reach the assets of a revocable trust during the lifetime of the settlor. If the trust is a self-settled irrevocable trust, a creditor may reach the maximum amount that can be distributed to or for the settlor's benefit presently or in the future.

Subchapter 5 also specifies that a beneficiary's use of real or tangible property owned by a trust does not subject the property to the claims of the beneficiary's creditors. The Code treats trusts that give the trustee absolute discretion in making distributions and trusts that require the trustee to make distributions for purposes of support in a similar manner. Under the Code, a beneficiary's interest in a trust that is subject to a trustee's discretion does not constitute an interest in property.

Subchapter 6: Revocable Trusts Subchapter 6 addresses "revocable trusts," which the Code defines as trusts that may be revoked by a settlor without the consent of the trustee or an adverse party. Property held in a revocable trust reverts back to the settlor if the trust is revoked. The Code treats a revocable trust as a will substitute and therefore provides that the capacity required to create or modify a revocable trust is the same as the capacity required to create or modify a will. Under the Code, a trust is revocable unless the trust instrument expressly provides that it is irrevocable. This reverses the presumption under current law and applies only to trusts that are created after the effective date of the bill.

This subchapter provides that, while a trust is revocable, the trustee owes its duties exclusively to the settlor. Under the Code, a settlor's powers of revocation may be exercised by a properly authorized agent, or by a conservator or guardian with court approval. Therefore, a trust may remain revocable, even for an incapacitated settlor, until the settlor's death. When the settlor dies, the trust is no longer revocable and the trustee owes its duties to the beneficiaries.

Finally, subchapter 6 limits the period during which a person may challenge the validity of a revocable trust. Under the Code, to challenge the validity of a revocable trust, a person must commence a judicial proceeding no later than one year after the settlor's death or four months after the trustee sends the person a copy of the trust and notice of the time allowed for commencing a proceeding, whichever occurs first.

Subchapter 7: Office of Trustee Subchapter 7 specifies numerous default procedural rules that apply to the office of the trustee. Subchapter 7 includes rules related to acceptance or declination of a trusteeship, requiring a bond, the rights and obligations of cotrustees, the vacancy and appointment of successor trustees, the resignation of a trustee, the grounds for removing a trustee, duties of a former trustee to deliver trust property, trustee compensation, and the reimbursement of trustee expenses. Subchapter 7 also provides that property is properly transferred to a trust by titling the property in the name of the trustee. However, property titled in the name of the trust also places legal title in the name of the trustee.

Subchapter 8: Duties and Powers of Trustees, Directing Parties, and Trust Protectors Subchapter 8 sets forth the fiduciary obligations of a trustee, except for those fiduciary duties included in the Uniform Prudent Investor Act. Under the Code, a trustee must administer the trust in good faith, solely in the interests of the beneficiaries, impartially, and prudently, incurring only reasonable costs and using any special skills or expertise the trustee may have. A trustee must take reasonable steps to control and protect trust property, to maintain adequate records that clearly identify separate trust interests, to enforce claims of the trust and defend claims against the trust, to collect trust property and to redress breaches of former trustees, and to exercise discretion in good faith and in accordance with the terms of the trust.

A trustee has a duty to inform and report and must provide requested trust accountings to certain beneficiaries.

Under the Code, a trustee may delegate certain duties and powers but must exercise reasonable care, skill, and caution when selecting an agent, establishing the scope and terms of the delegation, and periodically reviewing the agent's actions. An agent who accepts a delegation of duty or power from a trustee has a duty to exercise reasonable care to comply with the terms of the delegation. A trustee who properly delegates a duty or power to an agent is not liable to the beneficiaries for the agent's actions.

Subchapter 8 provides that a trustee has broad power to achieve proper investment, management, and distribution of the trust property and may exercise all the powers that an unmarried, competent owner would have over individually owned property. This subchapter also enumerates specific powers that a trustee has absent contrary provisions in the trust instrument, and requires a trustee to make certain presumptions related to certain tax objectives, including presumptions concerning marital deduction transfers that are not included in the UTC.

As an addition to the UTC, the Code specifically allows a settlor, a court, or interested persons in a nonjudicial settlement agreement to appoint directing parties and trust protectors. The Code defines "directing party" as a person who is granted a power, in a capacity other than as a trustee or a trust protector, to make or to direct the trustee to make investment and distribution decisions. A directing party is a fiduciary and is obligated to act in good faith, consistent with the terms and purposes of the trust, and the interests of the beneficiaries. A trustee has no duty to monitor the directing party, and a trustee who follows a directing party's directions is not liable for any resulting losses, unless the loss is a result of the trustee's willful misconduct.

Under the Code, a "trust protector" is a person who is granted certain powers over the trust, the trustee, or trust property in a capacity other than as a trustee or a directing party. A settlor, court, or interested persons in a nonjudicial settlement agreement may specify whether a power granted to a trust protector must be exercised in a fiduciary or nonfiduciary capacity. If a settlor, court, or interested persons do not specify the legal capacity in which a trust protector is to exercise a particular power, the Code provides default rules for determining the capacity for specific powers. A trustee has no duty to monitor the actions of a trust protector and, subject to certain exceptions, is not liable for taking actions consistent with the actions of the trust protector.

Subchapter 9: Investment Management of Trusts Subchapter 9 provides that, subject to certain exceptions, the investment management of trust property is governed by the Uniform Prudent Investor Act, which has been adopted in this state. As an exception to this general rule, a trustee who has no power over directed trust property does not have a duty to monitor the conduct or investment performance of the directing party.

The Code also limits the application of the Uniform Prudent Investor Act for life insurance trusts. If a principal purpose of a trust is to hold a life insurance contract, a trustee does not have a duty to determine whether the life insurance contract is, or remains, a proper investment. This change applies to all trusts executed after the effective date of the bill and to trusts executed before that date if the trustee provides a notice to the qualified beneficiaries.

Subchapter 10: Liability of Trustees and Rights of Persons Dealing with Trustee Subchapter 10 identifies the remedies for breach of trust, provides how damages are determined for a breach of trust, reaffirms the court's power to award costs and attorney fees, specifies potential defenses, and addresses trustee relations with and liability to persons other than beneficiaries. Under the Code, a trust instrument may not waive or vary the trustee's duty of good faith or relieve the trustee of liability for reckless indifference. The Code also provides that a term in a trust that relieves a trustee of liability is not enforceable if the inclusion of the term is the result of an abuse of the settlor's confidential relationship with the trustee.

Generally, under the Code, a beneficiary must commence a proceeding against a trustee for breach of trust within five years after the first to occur of the following:

the termination of the trust, the termination of the beneficiary's interest, or the removal, resignation, or death of the trustee. However, the Code creates a one-year statute of limitation for commencing such a proceeding if the beneficiary received a report that adequately disclosed the existence of a potential claim.

Under the Code, a trustee is protected from liability for a loss in value of the trust property if there is no breach of trust. A trustee generally is not liable if the trustee acts in reasonable reliance on the express provisions of the trust, if the trustee exercises reasonable care but fails to ascertain unknown external facts, or if a beneficiary provides a consent, release, or ratification for the trustee's action. A trustee is also protected from personal liability on a contract entered into in a fiduciary capacity and for contracts and torts of a partnership in which the trustee holds a general partnership interest if the other party had notice of the fiduciary relationship.

In general, a trustee is entitled to payment from the trust for attorney fees incurred in good faith. However, if a claim against the trustee is based on a breach of trust, the trustee must provide notice to qualified beneficiaries of the trustee's intention to pay attorney fees from the trust. Any party to the action may seek a court order prohibiting payment of attorney fees from the trust by demonstrating to the court that there is a reasonable basis for the court to find that a breach of trust occurred.

A third party dealing with a trust is not liable for any breach of the trustee's obligations to the beneficiaries resulting from a transaction, unless the third party has knowledge of an actual breach by the trustee. In addition, a third party may rely on a certification of trust that sets out certain required information, including a statement that the trust has not been revoked, modified, or amended in any manner that would cause the representations in the certificate to be incorrect. A third party who receives a certification of trust and continues to demand a complete copy of a trust instrument may be liable for damages if the demand is not in good faith.

Subchapter 11: Uniform Principal and Income Act Down Down /2013/related/proposals/sb384 true proposaltext /2013/related/proposals/sb384 proposaltext/2013/REG/SB384 proposaltext/2013/REG/SB384 section true Menu » 2013 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » SB384: Bill Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {

$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });

});

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Republican.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 3 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Nov 8, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Nov 8, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2013

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 1 · Nov 12, 2013

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 16, 2013

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 16, 2013

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 92.

  3. Dec 12, 2013

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 15, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Nov 14, 2013

    The Assembly passed it too.

  6. Nov 12, 2013

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Nov 12, 2013

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Nov 12, 2013

    The Senate passed it, 32 to 1.

  9. Nov 12, 2013

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Nov 11, 2013

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Nov 11, 2013

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  12. Nov 11, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Nov 8, 2013

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  14. Nov 8, 2013

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  15. Nov 8, 2013

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Nov 6, 2013

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Nov 5, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications.

  18. Nov 4, 2013

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor.

  19. Nov 4, 2013

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 4, 2013 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Farrow and Risser; cosponsored by Representative Sanfelippo

  2. Nov 4, 2013 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Labor

  3. Nov 5, 2013 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Judiciary and Labor and rereferred to committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)

  4. Nov 6, 2013 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Nov 6, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Farrow and Risser

  6. Nov 8, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Nov 8, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Nov 8, 2013 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Nov 8, 2013 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  10. Nov 8, 2013 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  11. Nov 8, 2013 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  14. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  15. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  16. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  17. Nov 11, 2013 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-12-2013 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  18. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senators Farrow and Risser

  19. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  21. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  22. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  24. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1

  25. Nov 12, 2013 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  27. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  28. Nov 12, 2013 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:11 PM on 11-14-2013 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 21

  29. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  30. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  32. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Nov 14, 2013 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Nov 15, 2013 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  35. Nov 15, 2013 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  36. Dec 6, 2013 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  37. Dec 6, 2013 · Senate

    LRB correction

  38. Dec 12, 2013 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 12-12-2013

  39. Dec 16, 2013 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-13-2013. 2013 Wisconsin Act 92

  40. Dec 16, 2013 · Senate

    Published 12-14-2013

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote