Senate Bill 389
Indexing for inflation of, and making other changes to, the college savings plan income tax deduction. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 9, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 4, 2013
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 22, 2014
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 13, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 227
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 9, 2014: “Published 4-9-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, there is a college tuition and expenses program, commonly referred to as "EdVest I," under which a contributor may purchase "tuition units" that can be used to pay qualified educational costs in behalf of a beneficiary. The purchase of the units is limited to parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, aunts, uncles, legal guardians, trusts created in behalf of a beneficiary, or individuals purchasing units for their own use. Contributions made to an account set up under the program, up to a limit of $3,000 each year for each beneficiary, may be deducted from a contributor's income in the calculation of his or her income taxes if the beneficiary of the account is one of the following: the claimant; the claimant's child;
the claimant's grandchild; the claimant's great-grandchild; or the claimant's niece or nephew.
Read the full summary Show less
Also, under current law, there is a college savings program, commonly referred to as "EdVest II," under which anyone may open an account for a prospective student, regardless of the contributor's relationship to the beneficiary. Individuals may open accounts for themselves, and a prospective student may be the beneficiary of more than one college savings account. Contributions made to an account set up under this program, up to a limit of $3,000 each year for each beneficiary, may be deducted from a contributor's income in the calculation of his or her income taxes if the beneficiary of the account is one of the following: the claimant; the claimant's child; the claimant's grandchild; the claimant's great-grandchild; or the claimant's niece or nephew.
An authorized contributor to an EdVest I or EdVest II account who is not the owner of the account may claim a tax deduction for his or her contribution, subject to the current law limitations, if the claimant is the parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, aunt, or uncle of the beneficiary.
Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for amounts contributed to both EdVest I and EdVest II by a divorced or legally separated parent of a child. The deduction may be claimed without regard to whether the child is his or her dependent. The total annual deduction under these two programs, per beneficiary, claimed by married parents who file jointly or separately, or by the divorced or legally separated parents of a child, may not exceed $3,000. The total annual deduction under these two programs, per beneficiary, claimed by a married person who files separately may not exceed $1,500 per claimant. The total annual deduction under these two programs, per beneficiary, claimed by a formerly married couple may not exceed a total of $3,000, or $1,500 per claimant, except that the former couple's divorce judgment may specify a different division of the $3,000 maximum that may be claimed by each former spouse.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013, this bill indexes for inflation the maximum amount of contributions that may be deducted under EdVest I and EdVest II accounts.
With regard to an EdVest II account, the bill authorizes deductions, generally, that are made on or before April 15 of the taxable year after the taxable year to which the deduction relates. If someone contributes to an EdVest II account more than the maximum amount that may be deducted, the bill allows the taxpayer to carry forward the excess amount contributed to future taxable years. The bill also authorizes an owner or any other individual to claim a deduction for contributions to an EdVest II account that benefits any individual.
Under current law, a beneficiary's right to qualified withdrawals from an EdVest II account is not subject to garnishment, attachment, execution, or other process of law. Under this bill, an EdVest II account is not subject to garnishment, lien, levy, attachment, execution, or other process of law.
Under current law, the College Savings Program Board, which is part of the Department of Administration, is required to promulgate rules for, and administer, the EdVest II program, including rules to determine whether a withdrawal from such an account is a qualified or nonqualified withdrawal under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), and impose more than a minimal penalty for nonqualified withdrawals.
Under this bill, an individual who receives certain distributions from an EdVest II account must add certain amounts to his or her federal adjusted gross income (FAGI) for the year in which he or she receives the distribution. If the distribution results in the recipient of the distribution being penalized under the IRC, the amounts that must be added to FAGI are any amounts that were not used for a qualified higher education expense to the extent that such amounts were previously claimed as a deduction from FAGI. Also under the bill, an amount in an EdVest II account that is distributed to an owner and rolled over into a qualified tuition program of another state must be added to FAGI, to the extent that such amount was previously claimed as a deduction from FAGI.
Because this bill relates to an exemption from state or local taxes, it may be referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions for a report to be printed as an appendix to the bill.
Who's behind it
7 senators are its . 6 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
13 more lawmakers .
See all 20 names Hide the names
Authors (7)
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Paul F. Farrow · Republican, Senate
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Terry Moulton · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (13)
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Endsley · Republican, Assembly
- Chris Kapenga · Republican, Senate
- Dean Kaufert · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Dale Kooyenga · Republican, Senate
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- John Nygren · Republican, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 5 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Workforce Development vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 16, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Workforce Development vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 16, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 16, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 16, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 32 to 0 · Jan 22, 2014 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (32)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- John Lehman (D, 21)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Nikiya Harris Dodd (D, 6)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Richard Gudex (R, 18)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
Didn't vote (1)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 9, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 9, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 227.
-
Apr 7, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 13, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Jan 30, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 22, 2014
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 22, 2014
The Senate passed it, 32 to 0.
-
Jan 22, 2014
The Senate adopted it.
-
Jan 16, 2014
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 16, 2014
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Jan 16, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Jan 16, 2014
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Nov 26, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 7, 2013
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 6, 2013
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 4, 2013
Sent to the Senate Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue.
-
Nov 4, 2013
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 4, 2013 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Darling, Schultz, Petrowski, Harsdorf, Lassa, Moulton and Farrow; cosponsored by Representatives Nygren, Brooks, Endsley, Kapenga, Kaufert, Knodl, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, Marklein, Murphy, Ohnstad, Strachota and Thiesfeldt
- Nov 4, 2013 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue
- Nov 6, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 7, 2013 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Nov 26, 2013 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 10, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Darling
- Jan 15, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Referred to Joint Committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-22-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Jan 22, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 22, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 30, 2014 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 11, 2014 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-13-2014 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 13, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 14, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 24, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 7, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-7-2014
- Apr 9, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 227
- Apr 9, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-9-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote