Senate Bill 475
Changing the timing of eligibility changes and other changes to BadgerCare Plus. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Jan 17, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 8, 2014
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 21 to 11
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jan 14, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 117
Latest entry in the official record, Jan 17, 2014: “Published 1-17-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Currently, the Department of Health Services (DHS) administers the Medical Assistance (MA) program, which is a joint federal and state program that provides health services to individuals who have limited resources. Some services are provided through programs that operate under a waiver of federal Medicaid laws, including services provided through the BadgerCare Plus (BC+). Under current law, BC+ provides health and medical services to eligible recipients and has a standard plan with a larger set of benefits and a Benchmark plan with fewer benefits. The 2013-2015 biennial budget act, 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 (Act 20), made changes to BC+ and MA, and some of those changes were not to go into effect until January 1, 2014.
Another act, 2013 Wisconsin Act 116 (Act 116), delayed some of these changes until April 1, 2014. This bill again changes the date at which some of the changes take effect to February 1, 2014.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, unless DHS has a policy that conflicts with current state law eligibility requirements, certain individuals are eligible for benefits under the BC+ standard plan. Beginning on April 1, 2014, Act 20 and Act 116 reduce the income eligibility level for the BC+ standard plan for parents and caretaker relatives from not more than 200 percent of the federal poverty line (FPL) to not more than 100 percent of the FPL before a 5 percent income disregard is applied. Act 20 and Act 116 also define, beginning on April 1, 2014, for purposes of eligibility of a parent or caretaker relative, a "dependent child." Under current law, certain individuals who are not eligible for the BC+ standard plan are eligible for benefits under the BC+ Benchmark plan. Under Acts 20 and 116, parents and caretaker relatives are covered only under the standard plan beginning on April 1, 2014. The bill changes the effective date of the income eligibility requirements for parents and caretaker relatives, the definition of dependent child, and the elimination of the eligibility of parents and caretaker relatives for the Benchmark plan from April 1, 2014, to February 1, 2014. Under the bill, however, individuals whose family income does not exceed 200 percent of the FPL, who apply and are eligible for benefits as a parent or caretaker relative under the BC+ standard or Benchmark plan before February 1, 2014, and who would otherwise be eligible for benefits as a parent or caretaker relative except for the income limit continue to be eligible for the benefits that they were eligible for before February 1, 2014, until April 1, 2014.
Under current law, family income is the total gross earned and unearned income received by all members of a family. Beginning on April 1, 2014, under Acts 20 and 116, for purposes of determining eligibility for BC+, family income has the meaning given for household income under a federal regulation, which uses an income calculation based on modified adjusted gross income. Acts 20 and 116 also require DHS, beginning on January 1, 2014, to apply the definition of household in federal regulations to determinations of income. Acts 20 and 116 also make other changes to the calculation of income and family size for BC+ on April 1, 2014. The bill changes the effective date of the use of modified adjusted gross income calculations for eligibility determination from April 1, 2014, to February 1, 2014.
Under the bill, an individual who applies for MA on or after February 1, 2014, is subject to the income eligibility changes for parents and caretaker relatives and the modified adjusted gross income calculations at the time of application. For an individual who applies for MA before February 1, 2014, the bill does not apply the income eligibility changes for parents and caretaker relatives or a calculation method for self-employment income to that individual's eligibility redetermination until April 1, 2014. For an individual who applies for MA before February 1, 2014, the modified adjusted gross income calculations do not apply until a redetermination of eligibility for MA on April 1, 2014, or the actual date of the redetermination, whichever is later. If, however, a parent or caretaker relative who is receiving continued eligibility under the bill for benefits after February 1, 2014, has an increase in family income such that the individual's family income exceeds 200 percent of the FPL on or after February 1, 2014, DHS must determine the individual's eligibility for MA and the modified adjusted gross income calculations apply.
Under current law, certain individuals in addition to certain parents and caretaker relatives are eligible for benefits under the BC+ Benchmark plan, including pregnant women whose family income exceeds 200 percent but does not exceed 300 percent of the FPL and children under one year of age of those women;
certain other pregnant women; and children whose family income exceeds 200 percent but does not exceed 300 percent of the FPL. Acts 20 and 116, beginning on April 1, 2014, provide benefits under the standard plan to the pregnant women and children who are currently eligible for the BC+ Benchmark plan. The bill changes the effective date of these changes from April 1, 2014, to February 1, 2014.
Who's behind it
The Joint Committee on Finance introduced it.
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it
Passed, 11 to 4 · Jan 8, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 18 to 14 · Jan 14, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 18, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 21 to 11 · Jan 14, 2014 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (21)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Richard Gudex (R, 18)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
No (11)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- John Lehman (D, 21)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Nikiya Harris Dodd (D, 6)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
Didn't vote (1)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 11”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Jan 17, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Jan 17, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 117.
-
Jan 16, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 14, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Jan 14, 2014
“Read” (the official wording)
-
Jan 14, 2014
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 14, 2014
The Senate passed it, 21 to 11.
-
Jan 8, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 4.
-
Jan 8, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 8, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 8, 2014
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Jan 8, 2014
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 8, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Joint Committee on Finance
- Jan 8, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance
- Jan 8, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 8, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 8, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 8, 2014 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4
- Jan 8, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 13, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-14-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 14, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators T. Cullen, Wirch, Risser, C. Larson, Lassa, Hansen, Erpenbach, Carpenter, L. Taylor, Harris, Shilling, Lehman, Miller and Jauch
- Jan 14, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 14, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 18, Noes 14
- Jan 14, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 14, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 14, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 11
- Jan 14, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Read
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended and taken up
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jan 14, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 15, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Jan 15, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Jan 16, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 1-16-2014
- Jan 17, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 1-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 117
- Jan 17, 2014 · Senate
Published 1-17-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote