Senate Bill 498
Notifications concerning the assertion of rights under a patent or pending patent and providing a penalty. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 24, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 15, 2014
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 11, 2014
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 20, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 339
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 24, 2014: “Published 4-24-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill regulates written communications attempting to enforce or assert rights in connection with a patent or pending patent. Under the bill, such a written communication is called a "patent notification." Under the bill, a "target" of a patent notification is an individual who is a resident of this state or a company that is domiciled in or does substantial business in this state and who either receives a patent notification or has customers who receive a patent notification concerning a product, service, process, or technology of the target.
Under the bill, a patent notification must contain certain information, including the number and a copy of each patent or pending patent that is the subject of the patent notification; an identification of each patent claim being asserted and the target's product, service, process, or technology to which that claim relates; and the basis for each theory of each patent claim being asserted and how that claim relates to the target's product, service, process, or technology. The bill provides a 30-day opportunity for a person to supplement a patent notification with any required information the person fails to include in the initial patent notification. A patent notification may not contain false, misleading, or deceptive information.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill provides that the Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection (DATCP) or the attorney general may investigate an alleged violation of the bill's requirements. The bill authorizes the attorney general to initiate a court action for an injunction of a violation of the bill's requirements, and in such an action, the bill authorizes the court to make any necessary orders to restore to any person any pecuniary loss the person may have suffered as a result of the violation. The bill also authorizes the attorney general to seek a forfeiture to the state of up to $50,000 for each violation of the bill's requirements.
The bill further creates a private right of action for a target or other person aggrieved by a violation of the bill's requirements. The target or other person may seek an injunction restraining further violation and may recover an appropriate award of damages, an award of costs and reasonable attorney fees, and an award of punitive damages not to exceed $50,000 for each violation or three times the aggregate amount of actual damages and costs and attorney fees awarded by the court, whichever is greater.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . 2 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
12 more lawmakers .
See all 15 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Paul F. Farrow · Republican, Senate
- Robert Jauch · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (12)
- Peter Barca · Democrat, Assembly
- Janet Bewley · Democrat, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- David Craig · Republican, Senate
- Mary Czaja · Republican, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Chris Kapenga · Republican, Senate
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Adam Neylon · Republican, Assembly
- Stephen Smith · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 6, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 6, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 6, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 24, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 24, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 339.
-
Apr 22, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 20, 2014
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Mar 20, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 18, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 12, 2014
The Assembly received it.
-
Mar 11, 2014
The Senate passed it.
-
Mar 11, 2014
The Senate adopted it.
-
Mar 6, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Mar 6, 2014
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 6, 2014
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 10, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 6, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 15, 2014
Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications.
-
Jan 15, 2014
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 15, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Farrow, Olsen and Jauch; cosponsored by Representatives Neylon, Craig, Kapenga, Knodl, Marklein, Bies, Jacque, Czaja, Barca, Bewley and Smith
- Jan 15, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications
- Feb 6, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 10, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 4, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Farrow
- Mar 5, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Farrow, Shilling and Wirch
- Mar 5, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 6, 2014 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 6, 2014 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 6, 2014 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 6, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 7, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 11, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 10:38 AM on 3-20-2014 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Representative Mason added as a cosponsor
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 21, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 26, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 22, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014
- Apr 24, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 339
- Apr 24, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-24-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote