Skip to content
Bills from the 2013–14 session

Senate Bill 498

Notifications concerning the assertion of rights under a patent or pending patent and providing a penalty. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 24, 2014. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 15, 2014

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 11, 2014

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 20, 2014

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2013 Wisconsin Act 339

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 24, 2014: “Published 4-24-2014”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill regulates written communications attempting to enforce or assert rights in connection with a patent or pending patent. Under the bill, such a written communication is called a "patent notification." Under the bill, a "target" of a patent notification is an individual who is a resident of this state or a company that is domiciled in or does substantial business in this state and who either receives a patent notification or has customers who receive a patent notification concerning a product, service, process, or technology of the target.

Under the bill, a patent notification must contain certain information, including the number and a copy of each patent or pending patent that is the subject of the patent notification; an identification of each patent claim being asserted and the target's product, service, process, or technology to which that claim relates; and the basis for each theory of each patent claim being asserted and how that claim relates to the target's product, service, process, or technology. The bill provides a 30-day opportunity for a person to supplement a patent notification with any required information the person fails to include in the initial patent notification. A patent notification may not contain false, misleading, or deceptive information.

Read the full summary

The bill provides that the Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection (DATCP) or the attorney general may investigate an alleged violation of the bill's requirements. The bill authorizes the attorney general to initiate a court action for an injunction of a violation of the bill's requirements, and in such an action, the bill authorizes the court to make any necessary orders to restore to any person any pecuniary loss the person may have suffered as a result of the violation. The bill also authorizes the attorney general to seek a forfeiture to the state of up to $50,000 for each violation of the bill's requirements.

The bill further creates a private right of action for a target or other person aggrieved by a violation of the bill's requirements. The target or other person may seek an injunction restraining further violation and may recover an appropriate award of damages, an award of costs and reasonable attorney fees, and an award of punitive damages not to exceed $50,000 for each violation or three times the aggregate amount of actual damages and costs and attorney fees awarded by the court, whichever is greater.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. 2 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

12 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (12)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 6, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 6, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 6, 2014

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 24, 2014

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 24, 2014

    The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 339.

  3. Apr 22, 2014

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 20, 2014

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Mar 20, 2014

    The Assembly passed it too.

  6. Mar 18, 2014

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Mar 12, 2014

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Mar 11, 2014

    The Senate passed it.

  9. Mar 11, 2014

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Mar 6, 2014

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  11. Mar 6, 2014

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Mar 6, 2014

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  13. Feb 10, 2014

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 6, 2014

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Jan 15, 2014

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications.

  16. Jan 15, 2014

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 15, 2014 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Farrow, Olsen and Jauch; cosponsored by Representatives Neylon, Craig, Kapenga, Knodl, Marklein, Bies, Jacque, Czaja, Barca, Bewley and Smith

  2. Jan 15, 2014 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications

  3. Feb 6, 2014 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 10, 2014 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 4, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Farrow

  6. Mar 5, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Farrow, Shilling and Wirch

  7. Mar 5, 2014 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Mar 6, 2014 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  9. Mar 6, 2014 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  10. Mar 6, 2014 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Public Works, and Telecommunications, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  11. Mar 6, 2014 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Mar 7, 2014 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-11-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  16. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  18. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  19. Mar 11, 2014 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Mar 12, 2014 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  21. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  22. Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 10:38 AM on 3-20-2014 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28

  23. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Representative Mason added as a cosponsor

  28. Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Mar 21, 2014 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  30. Mar 26, 2014 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  31. Apr 22, 2014 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014

  32. Apr 24, 2014 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 339

  33. Apr 24, 2014 · Senate

    Published 4-24-2014

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote