Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: the information contained in referendum questions to authorize exceeding county levy limits.
County — Taxation Primary elections Referendum
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Generally, under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,
village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not increase its levy in any year
by a percentage that exceeds its "valuation factor," which is defined as the greater
of either zero percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's
equalized value due to new construction, less improvements removed. The base
amount of a political subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the
actual levy for the immediately preceding year.
Under one of the current law exceptions, a political subdivision may exceed the
levy limits that otherwise apply if the political subdivision's governing body adopts
a resolution to that effect and the resolution is approved in a referendum.
Under current law, the wording in the referendum question that appears on the
ballot must include information relating to the maximum allowable levy rate
increase for the next year and the total levy for the next year. However, the
information that is necessary to prepare the question is not available to the political
subdivision in time to put the question on the ballot for the spring primary or election
or partisan primary. The bill requires that in preparing the ballot question for a
referendum at a partisan primary in 2014, a county with a population of at least
30,000, but no more than 40,000, that is adjacent to a county with a population
exceeding 450,000, must use the most recent data that it has and the most recent
data from the Department of Revenue.
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 12, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 23, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Lazich; cosponsored by Representatives Marklein, Ringhand and Bernier
- Jan 23, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Elections and Urban Affairs
- Feb 4, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 12, 2014 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Miller
- Feb 12, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 12, 2014 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 12, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended and taken up
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 19, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 24, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 16, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-15-2014
- Apr 17, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 310
- Apr 17, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-17-2014