Senate Bill 518
A duty of podiatrists, chiropractors, dentists, and optometrists to inform patients of treatment options and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 24, 2014. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 27, 2014
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 18, 2014
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 20, 2014
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2013 Wisconsin Act 345
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 24, 2014: “Published 4-24-2014”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under Wisconsin's physician informed consent law, a physician who treats a patient has a duty to inform the patient about treatment options. A physician who fails to so inform a patient about modes of treatment may be held civilly liable for damages under tort law. This common law duty, as it relates to physicians, has been codified as a statutory duty.
In the case Hannemann v. Boyson , 2005 WI 94, the Wisconsin Supreme Court wrote that this duty to inform a patient about treatment options was not necessarily limited to physicians, and the court held in Hannemann that a chiropractor had such a duty to inform a patient. The duty, as it relates to chiropractors or any other types of health care professionals other than physicians, has not previously been codified as a statutory duty.
Read the full summary Show less
2013 Wisconsin Act 111 modified the codified duty of physicians to inform a patient about treatment options in a number of ways, including: 1) providing that the "reasonable physician standard," as defined in the act, is the standard for informing a patient and 2) providing that the physician's duty does not require the disclosure of information about alternate medical modes of treatment for any condition the physician has not included in his or her diagnosis at the time the physician informs the patient.
This bill codifies into the statutes a similar duty to inform a patient about treatment options with respect to the following types of health care professionals:
1) chiropractors; 2) dentists; 3) podiatrists; and 4) optometrists.
Specifically, the bill provides that any chiropractor, dentist, podiatrist, or optometrist who treats a patient must inform the patient about the availability of reasonable alternate modes of treatment and about the benefits and risks of these treatments. The bill provides that the reasonable chiropractor, dentist, podiatrist, or optometrist standard, whichever is applicable, is the standard for informing a patient under that duty. The bill provides that this standard requires disclosure only of information that a reasonable chiropractor, dentist, podiatrist, or optometrist would know and disclose under the circumstances. The bill provides that a chiropractor's, dentist's, podiatrist's, or optometrist's duty to so inform the patient does not require disclosure of any of the following:
1) Detailed technical information that in all probability a patient would not understand.
2) Risks apparent or known to the patient.
3) Extremely remote possibilities that might falsely or detrimentally alarm the patient.
4) Information in emergencies where failure to provide treatment would be more harmful to the patient than treatment.
5) Information in cases where the patient is incapable of consenting.
6) Information about alternate modes of treatment for any condition the chiropractor, dentist, podiatrist, or optometrist has not included in his or her diagnosis at the time the chiropractor, dentist, podiatrist, or optometrist informs the patient.
Also under current law, the Medical Examining Board must promulgate rules implementing the physician's duty to inform a patient about treatment options, as codified into the statutes. This bill similarly requires the Chiropractic Examining Board, the Dentistry Examining Board, the Podiatry Affiliated Credentialing Board, and the Optometry Examining Board to promulgate rules implementing the chiropractor's, dentist's, podiatrist's, and optometrist's duties to inform a patient about treatment options, as those duties are codified into the statutes by the bill.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Republicans.
1 more lawmaker .
See all 4 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (1)
- Mary Czaja · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 14, 2014
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 24, 2014
The new law was published.
-
Apr 24, 2014
The governor signed it. It became 2013 Wisconsin Act 345.
-
Apr 22, 2014
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 20, 2014
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 20, 2014
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 18, 2014
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 18, 2014
The Senate passed it.
-
Feb 14, 2014
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.
-
Feb 12, 2014
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 30, 2014
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 27, 2014
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Labor.
-
Jan 27, 2014
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 27, 2014 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Grothman, Tiffany and Lasee; cosponsored by Representative Czaja
- Jan 27, 2014 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Labor
- Jan 30, 2014 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 12, 2014 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 13, 2014 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 14, 2014 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Labor, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 14, 2014 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 17, 2014 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-18-2014 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 18, 2014 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 18, 2014 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 10:41 AM on 3-20-2014 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 20, 2014 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 21, 2014 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 26, 2014 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 22, 2014 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-22-2014
- Apr 24, 2014 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-23-2014. 2013 Wisconsin Act 345
- Apr 24, 2014 · Senate
Published 4-24-2014
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote